| Literature DB >> 23138691 |
Juan Nogales1, Steinn Gudmundsson, Ines Thiele.
Abstract
We recently assessed the metabolism of Synechocystis sp PCC6803 through a constraints-based reconstruction and analysis approach and identified its main metabolic properties. These include reduced metabolic robustness, in contrast to a high photosynthetic robustness driving the optimal autotrophic metabolism. Here, we address how these metabolic features affect biotechnological capabilities of this bacterium. The search for growth-coupled overproducer strains revealed that the carbon flux re-routing, but not the electron flux, is significantly more challenging under autotrophic conditions than under mixo- or heterotrophic conditions. We also found that the blocking of the light-driven metabolism was required for carbon flux re-routing under mixotrophic conditions. Overall, our analysis, which represents the first systematic evaluation of the biotechnological capabilities of a photosynthetic organism, paradoxically suggests that the light-driven metabolism itself and its unique metabolic features are the main bottlenecks in harnessing the biotechnological potential of Synechocystis.Entities:
Keywords: COBRA methods; Synechocystissp. PCC6803; biosustainability; genome-scale modeling; metabolic engineering; photosynthetic robustness
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23138691 PMCID: PMC3669157 DOI: 10.4161/bioe.22792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269

Figure 1. A depiction of the central metabolism of Synechocystis. Native and non-native experimentally overproduced metabolites in Synechocystis are represented by black and gray squares, respectively and the metabolites analyzed in this study are indicated by red lines. The carbon partitioning (in %) to sugar, lipids and terpenoid biosynthesis together with the predicted carbon flux distribution (normalized to the CO2 uptake rate) -under autotrophic conditions is also shown. The non-native metabolites are 1-butanol (BUT), lactate (LAC), isobutyraldehyde (IBTAL). The abbreviations for the native metabolites are given in Nogales et al.

Figure 2. Production envelopes for wild-type and knockout Synechocystis strains. The production envelopes for each metabolite is shown as a function of the biomass production rate of the wild-type Synechocystis network under heterotrophic (black lines), autotrophic LLS (dark green lines), autotrophic CLS (light green lines), mixotrophic LLS (red lines) and mixotrophic CLS (blue lines), as well as the growth-coupled deletion mutants identified (dots). The number of growth-coupled knockouts found in each condition is shown in brackets.
Table 1. Properties of the growth-coupled overproducer designs under autotrophic conditions
| | Autotrophic conditions | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light limiting state (0.0522) | Carbon limiting state (0.0884) | |||||||||
| Metabolite | Maximun production rate | Number of knockouts | Growth rate | Production rate (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | BPCY | Maximun production rate | Number | Growth rate | Production rate | BPCY |
| (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | (h−1) | (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | Knockouts | (h−1) | (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | |||||
| Fumarate (4 C) | 0.897 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.043 | 0.0022 | 0.878 | 1 | 0.082 | 0.069 | 0.0057 |
| Ethanol (2 C) | 1.192 | 1 | 0.0519 | 0 - 0.0101 | - | 1.757 | 1 | 0.0875 | 0 - 0.0170 | - |
| 1-Butanol (4 C) | 0.596 | None found | - | - | - | 0.878 | None found | - | - | - |
| Sucrose (12 C) | 0.276 | None found | - | - | - | 0.292 | None found | - | - | - |
| Lactate (3 C) | 1.185 | None found | - | - | - | 1.171 | None found | - | - | - |
| H2 | 7.154 | 12 | 0.041 | 1.744 | 0.0723 | 24.416 | 8 | 0.041 | 19.345 | 0.8001 |
LLS, Light limiting state; CLS, Carbon limiting state; BPCY, Biomass-product coupled yield. Numbers inside parenthesis represent the wild-type growth rate.
Table 2. Properties of the growth-coupled overproducer designs under heterotrophic conditions
| Heterotrophic conditions (0.0743) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolite | Maximun production rate | Number of knockouts | Growth rate | Production rate (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | BPCY |
| (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | (h−1) | ||||
| Fumarate (4C) | 1.462 | 4 | 0.045 | 0.719 | 0.0324 |
| Ethanol (2 C) | 1.901 | 2 | 0.035 | 1.218 | 0.0426 |
| 1-Butanol (4 C) | 0.951 | 4 | 0.036 | 0.559 | 0.0199 |
| Sucrose (12 C) | 0.443 | 5 | 0.062 | 0.053 | 0.0033 |
| Lactate (3 C) | 1.867 | 3 | 0.023 | 1.444 | 0.0366 |
| H2 | 10.926 | 7 | 0.019 | 3.195 | 0.062 |
LLS, Light limiting state; CLS, Carbon limiting state; BPCY, Biomass-product coupled yield. Numbers inside parenthesis represent the wild-type growth rate.
Table 3. Properties of the growth-coupled overproducer designs under mixotrophic conditions
| | Mixotrophic conditions | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light limiting state (0.145) | Carbon limiting state (0.238) | |||||||||
| Metabolite | Maximun production rate | Number of knockouts | Growth rate | Production rate (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | BPCY | Maximun production rate | Number Knockouts | Growth rate | Production rate | BPCY |
| (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | (h−1) | (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | (h−1) | (mmol.gDW−1h−1) | ||||||
| Fumarate (4 C) | 2.351 | 6 | 0.061 | 0.88 | 0.0533 | 2.303 | 6 | 0.061 | 0.88 | 0.0533 |
| Ethanol (2 C) | 3.092 | 10 | 0.091 | 0.487 | 0.0441 | 4.607 | 7 | 0.037 | 0.682 | 0.0256 |
| 1-Butanol (4 C) | 1.546 | 5 | 0.038 | 0.591 | 0.0222 | 2.303 | 5 | 0.038 | 0.591 | 0.0222 |
| Sucrose (12 C) | 0.732 | 5 | 0.03 | 0.295 | 0.0088 | 0.767 | 5 | 0.03 | 0.295 | 0.0088 |
| Lactate (3 C) | 3.085 | 6 | 0.029 | 1.008 | 0.0291 | 3.071 | 6 | 0.029 | 1.008 | 0.0291 |
| H2 | 18.554 | 11 | 0.112 | 2.897 | 0.3248 | 35.452 | 8 | 0.156 | 16.12 | 2.507 |
LLS, Light limiting state; CLS, Carbon limiting state; BPCY, Biomass-product coupled yield. Numbers inside parenthesis represent the wild-type growth rate.