Literature DB >> 23138238

Periacetabular osteotomy and combined femoral head-neck junction osteochondroplasty: a minimum two-year follow-up cohort study.

Nader A Nassif1, Perry L Schoenecker, Robert Thorsness, John C Clohisy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral deformities and overcorrection of the acetabulum both can result in secondary femoroacetabular impingement and suboptimal clinical results after periacetabular osteotomy. The purpose of the present study was to determine the rate of complications, the need for reoperations, radiographic correction, and hip function among patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy and combined femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty as compared with those who underwent periacetabular osteotomy alone.
METHODS: Patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy with or without osteochondroplasty of the femoral head-neck junction were evaluated retrospectively after a minimum duration of follow-up of two years. We compared the two groups with regard to the modified Harris hip score, radiographic correction, complications, and reoperations.
RESULTS: Forty patients (forty hips) who underwent periacetabular osteotomy in conjunction with a femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty were compared with forty-eight patients (forty-eight hips) who underwent an isolated periacetabular osteotomy. Patients were evaluated after a mean duration of follow-up of 3.4 years (range, 2.0 to 9.7 years). Preoperatively, the modified Harris hip score (and standard deviation) was 64.3 ± 13.2 for the study group and 63.2 ± 13.4 for the comparison group. At the time of the latest follow-up, the modified Harris hip score was not significantly different between the study group and the comparison group (p = 0.17). Patients demonstrated equivalent preoperative deformities and postoperative acetabular radiographic parameters. There was a significant decrease in the alpha angle and improvement in head-neck offset in the study group. There was one reoperation for secondary impingement and/or labral pathology in the study group, compared with four reoperations in the comparison group. There were no adhesions requiring surgery, femoral neck fractures, instances of osteonecrosis, or increases in heterotopic ossification in the study group.
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral head-neck junction osteochondroplasty performed concurrently with a periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and associated femoral head-neck junction deformities is not associated with an increased complication rate. This combined procedure provides effective correction of associated femoral head-neck deformities and produces similar early functional outcomes when compared with isolated periacetabular osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23138238     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  22 in total

1.  CORR Insights ®: Are there sex-dependent differences in acetabular dysplasia characteristics?

Authors:  Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does previous pelvic osteotomy compromise the results of periacetabular osteotomy surgery?

Authors:  Jeffrey B Stambough; John C Clohisy; Geneva R Baca; Ira Zaltz; Robert Trousdale; Michael Millis; Daniel Sucato; Young-Jo Kim; Ernest Sink; Perry L Schoenecker; Rafael Sierra; David Podeszwa; Paul Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are there sex-dependent differences in acetabular dysplasia characteristics?

Authors:  Stephen T Duncan; Ljiljana Bogunovic; Geneva Baca; Perry L Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cartilage Thickness and Cyst Volume Are Unchanged 10 Years After Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients Without Hip Symptoms.

Authors:  Inger Mechlenburg; Jens Randel Nyengaard; John Gelineck; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Outcomes of Surgical Management of Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cameron Barton; Elizabeth Scott; Zain M Khazi; Michael Willey; Robert Westermann
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

6.  Arthroscopic Hip Joint Assessment can Impact the Indications for PAO Surgery.

Authors:  Marcin Wasko; Jeffrey J Nepple; John C Clohisy; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

Review 7.  Surgical treatment for young adult hip dysplasia: joint-preserving options.

Authors:  Min Chen; Xi-Fu Shang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Molecular characterization of articular cartilage from young adults with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Shingo Hashimoto; Muhammad Farooq Rai; Corey S Gill; Zhiqi Zhang; Linda J Sandell; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Prominent Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Morphologies Are Common in Patients with Acetabular Dysplasia Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Douglas Nestorovski; Marcin Wasko; Lucas M Fowler; Michael D Harris; John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  CORR Insights®: What Mid-term Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores, Reoperations, and Complications Are Associated with Concurrent Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy to Treat Dysplasia with Associated Intraarticular Abnormalities?

Authors:  Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.