Literature DB >> 23136838

A prospective, non comparative, multicenter study to investigate the effect of cadexomer iodine on bioburden load and other wound characteristics in diabetic foot ulcers.

Jamie A Schwartz1, John C Lantis, Cynthia Gendics, Amy M Fuller, Wyatt Payne, Diane Ochs.   

Abstract

Few studies regarding wound treatment with topical antimicrobials evaluate change in the bacterial bioburden of the wound with treatment. This study sought out to determine the in vivo effect of cadexomer iodine antibacterial dressing on diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that were infected or achieved a critical level of colonisation, looking specifically at wound progression in relation to bioburden. Fifteen patients corresponding to 16 total DFUs met criteria of displaying clinical signs of infection or critical colonisation and were suitable for a topical antibacterial dressing. They underwent weekly treatment for 6 weeks. Cultures were taken at week 0, 3 and 6 as appropriate. At week 6 median log10 bacterial count reduction of 1.0 was observed from baseline (p = 0·025). At week 3- a median log10 bacterial count reduction of 0.3 was observed from baseline (p = 0·049). Over the study period there was a 53.6% median reduction of the wound surface area. There were no patients that completely healed their ulcer over the 6 week study period. There was a statistically significant median reduction in the bacterial load over the 6 week period (p = 0·025) as well as 3 weeks (p = 0·049). This was accompanied by a median reduction of 53.6% in ulcer surface area and 50% in ulcer depth from baseline to final.
© 2012 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136838      PMCID: PMC7950698          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01109.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  19 in total

1.  Assessing bacterial burden in wounds: comparing clinical observation and wound swabs.

Authors:  Charne Nicole Miller; Keryln Carville; Nelly Newall; Suzanne Kapp; Gill Lewin; Leila Karimi; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Preparing the wound bed--debridement, bacterial balance, and moisture balance.

Authors:  R G Sibbald; D Williamson; H L Orsted; K Campbell; D Keast; D Krasner; D Sibbald
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 3.  A series of systematic reviews to inform a decision analysis for sampling and treating infected diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  E A Nelson; S O'Meara; D Craig; C Iglesias; S Golder; J Dalton; K Claxton; S E M Bell-Syer; E Jude; C Dowson; R Gadsby; P O'Hare; J Powell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Cavity foot ulcers in diabetic patients: a comparative study of cadexomer iodine ointment and standard treatment. An economic analysis alongside a clinical trial.

Authors:  J Apelqvist; G Ragnarson Tennvall
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.437

5.  A randomized-controlled trial comparing cadexomer iodine and nanocrystalline silver on the healing of leg ulcers.

Authors:  Charne N Miller; Nelly Newall; Suzanne E Kapp; Gill Lewin; Leila Karimi; Keryln Carville; Terry Gliddon; Nick M Santamaria
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  A clinical investigation into the relationship between increased periwound skin temperature and local wound infection in patients with chronic leg ulcers.

Authors:  Marjorie Fierheller; R Gary Sibbald
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Multicenter trial of cadexomer iodine to treat venous stasis ulcer.

Authors:  G A Holloway; K H Johansen; R W Barnes; G E Pierce
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-07

Review 8.  Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Susan O'Meara; Deyaa Al-Kurdi; Yemisi Ologun; Liza G Ovington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

9.  Swab cultures accurately identify bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot wounds not involving bone.

Authors:  R A Slater; T Lazarovitch; I Boldur; Y Ramot; A Buchs; M Weiss; A Hindi; M J Rapoport
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 10.  Management and prevention of diabetic foot ulcers and infections: a health economic review.

Authors:  Ivy Chow; Elkin V Lemos; Thomas R Einarson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect on total microbial load and community composition with two vs six-week topical Cadexomer Iodine for treating chronic biofilm infections in diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Matthew Malone; Saskia Schwarzer; Michael Radzieta; Thomas Jeffries; Annie Walsh; Hugh G Dickson; Grace Micali; Slade O Jensen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Effect of cadexomer iodine on the microbial load and diversity of chronic non-healing diabetic foot ulcers complicated by biofilm in vivo.

Authors:  M Malone; K Johani; S O Jensen; I B Gosbell; H G Dickson; S McLennan; H Hu; K Vickery
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Cadexomer iodine effectively reduces bacterial biofilm in porcine wounds ex vivo and in vivo.

Authors:  Eric D Roche; Emma J Woodmansey; Qingping Yang; Daniel J Gibson; Hongen Zhang; Gregory S Schultz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Antibiofilm Properties of Antiseptic Agents Used on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Koko Barrigah-Benissan; Jerome Ory; Catherine Dunyach-Remy; Cassandra Pouget; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Albert Sotto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.