Literature DB >> 23136525

DNA marker-assisted evaluation of potato genotypes for potential resistance to potato cyst nematode pathotypes not yet invading into Japan.

Kenji Asano1, Akira Kobayashi, Shogo Tsuda, Mio Nishinaka, Seiji Tamiya.   

Abstract

One of major objectives of crop breeding is conferring resistance to diseases and pests. However, large-scale phenotypic evaluation for many diseases and pests is difficult because strict controls are required to prevent their spread. Detection of disease resistance genes by using DNA markers may be an alternative approach to select potentially resistant accessions. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) breeders in Japan extensively use resistance gene H1, which confers nearly absolute resistance to potato cyst nematode (Globodera rostochiensis) pathotype Ro1, the only pathotype found in Japan. However, considering the possibility of accidental introduction of the other pathotypes, breeding of resistant varieties is an important strategy to prevent infestation by non-invading pathotypes in Japan. In this study, to evaluate the prevalence of resistance genes in Japanese genetic resources, we developed a multiplex PCR method that simultaneously detects 3 resistance genes, H1, Gpa2 and Gro1-4. We revealed that many Japanese varieties possess not only H1 but Gpa2, which are potentially resistant to other pathotypes of potato cyst nematode. On the other hand, no genotype was found to have the Gro1-4, indicating importance of introduction of varieties having Gro1-4. Our results demonstrate the applicability of DNA-marker assisted evaluation of resistant potato genotypes without phenotypic evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA marker; crop breeding; multiplex PCR; pathotype; potato cyst nematode; resistance gene

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136525      PMCID: PMC3405971          DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.62.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breed Sci        ISSN: 1344-7610            Impact factor:   2.086


Introduction

Conferring resistance to diseases and pests is a major goal of crop breeding. Traditionally, resistance is assessed by inoculating test plants with a disease or pest or by planting them in an infested field. However, the handling of many diseases and pests, which are not found or exist only in restricted areas in a country, is strictly restricted by quarantine. Therefore, large-scale phenotypic evaluation is impractical for breeding novel resistant varieties. The use of DNA markers for detecting disease resistance genes may be an alternative approach to phenotypic evaluation (Collard , Jena and Mackill 2008). DNA markers, which are closely linked to disease resistance genes, enable the evaluation of resistance genes without inoculation. Such evaluation provides information about the prevalence of disease resistance genes in genetic resources and facilitates breeding of novel resistant varieties. Potato cyst nematode (PCN) comprises 2 species (Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida) and 8 pathotypes (Ro1 to Ro5 of G. rostochiensis and Pa1 to Pa3 of G. pallida). Infested potato plants show retarded growth and decreased yield compared with healthy plants. PCN causes yield losses ranging from 20% to 70% and up to 30% worldwide (Oerke ). Thus these species are one of the most important pests of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and are therefore included in the list of quarantine pathogens in many countries. It can be controlled by crop rotation, chemical soil disinfestation and cultivation of resistant varieties. However, because of the formation of cysts, PCN can survive in soil for many years in the absence of host plants, making crop rotation unattractive for potato farmers. Chemical control of PCN involves unspecific and harmful pesticides. Because of increasing concern about environmental issues and governmental regulations, this method has been almost abandoned in many countries. Therefore, breeding and cultivation of resistant varieties are becoming increasingly important, and hence, scientific studies of the resistance genes and their underlying mechanisms are of great interest. Several genes and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) of PCN resistance derived from other cultivated species and wild species have already been identified in potato. Thirteen resistance loci confer partial resistance: Gro1.2, Gro1.3, Gro1.4, Gpa, Grp1, Gpa5, Gpa6, GpaM1, GpaM2, GpaM3, RGp5-vrn HC, GpaXI and GpaIV (Caromel , Kreike , 1994, 1996, Moloney , Sattarzadeh , Tan , van der Voort , 2000). Further, 4 loci (Gro1, H1, GroVI and Gpa2) (Barone , Gebhardt , Jacobs , van der Voort ) and the combination of GpaV and GpaXI (Caromel ) confer nearly absolute resistance to one or more pathotypes. Gro1.2, Gro1.3, Gro1.4, Gpa, GpaM1, GpaM2, GpaM3 and Gro1 were derived from S. spegazzinii Bitt.; RGp5-vrn HC and GroVI were derived from S. vernei Bitt. et. Wittm.; GpaXI was derived from S. tarijense Hawkes; GpaIV, H1 and Gpa2 were derived from S. tuberosum ssp. andigena Hawkes; GpaV and GpaXI were derived from S. sparsipilum (Bitt.) Juz. et. Buk.; Grp1, Gpa5 and Gpa6 were derived from interspecific hybrid clones of S. tuberosum and several wild species including S. oplocense Hawkes, S. spegazzinii, S. tuberosum ssp. andigena, S. vernei and S. vernei ssp. ballsii. Breeders have succeeded in producing potato varieties resistant to G. rostochiensis by introducing H1. H1 confers hypersensitive resistance to G. rostochiensis pathotypes Ro1 and Ro4 (Bakker , Gebhardt ). However, widespread and extensive use of varieties with H1 has inadvertently caused rapid worldwide increase in G. pallida (Bradshaw , Bryan ). Therefore, great emphasis is now placed on breeding of varieties resistant to a broad spectrum of PCN populations. Recently, a set of DNA markers closely linked to H1, N146 and N195, was developed; these markers sandwich H1 with recombination frequencies of 0.109% and 0.207%, respectively and have been used for selecting PCN-resistant lines (Mori , Takeuchi ). DNA marker Gro1-4 can detect Gro1-4 (Biryukova , Gebhardt ). Gro1-4 is a member of the Gro1 locus, which confers nearly absolute resistance to all pathotypes of G. rostochiensis, and is therefore considered a useful resistance gene (Barone , Paal ). Gpa2 provides dominant resistance to distinct G. pallida populations (Bakker , van der Voort , 1999); because this resistance gene has already been isolated and well characterized, markers directly amplifying the gene can be developed on the basis of its sequence information. Broad-spectrum resistance to G. rostochiensis and G. pallida is conferred by the Grp1 locus and detected by cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) marker TG432 (Finkers-Tomczak ). CAPS marker C237 is linked to GpaIV, which provides partial resistance to G. pallida Pa2/3 (Moloney ). Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker HC can detect RGp5-vrnHC, which confers partial resistance to G. pallida Pa2/3 (Sattarzadeh ). In Japan, breeding of PCN-resistant varieties was started just after pathotype Ro1 was discovered in 1972, and since then, achieving Ro1 resistance in new potato varieties has become the priority. Among the 8 pathotypes of PCN, only Ro1 has been found so far (Inagaki 1984, Kushida and Momota 2005). Because H1 provides perfect Ro1 resistance and has not been overcome by G. rostochiensis populations (Kushida and Momota 2005), breeders exclusively use this gene for breeding of Ro1-resistant varieties (Mori ). However, despite the strict quarantine procedures in Japan, the possibility of accidental introduction of the other PCN pathotypes cannot be completely excluded. Therefore, selection of potato genotypes potentially resistant to several pathotypes and breeding of resistant varieties are an important strategy to prevent infestation by other pathotypes. In this study, we tested published DNA markers and newly developed markers. Then, to identify candidate PCN-resistant accessions, we evaluated our genetic resources by a novel multiplex PCR method developed using selected DNA markers. Our results revealed the current status of resistance genes in our resources. Further, we discuss the possibility of evaluation of genetic resources for potential resistance to diseases and pests before actual invasion by using DNA markers.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and DNA isolation

Our genetic resources contain 812 varieties and lines including wild relatives, other cultivated species, landraces, modern varieties, and breeding lines derived from crosses among our resources and cover almost all varieties used in Japanese potato breeding. A list of the varieties and lines used in this study is shown in Supplementary Table 1. Total DNA was isolated by the hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide method (Doyle and Doyle 1987). To develop DNA markers and to determine the PCR conditions, samples were chosen on the basis of previous researches, evaluation data published in The European Cultivated Potato Database (http://www.europotato.org/menu.php), pedigree records and breeder’s evaluation. Kita-akari, Touya and Haruka, which are known to have H1, were used to determine the PCR condition for N146 and N195. For developing Gpa2 markers, Marijke which has Gpa2 (van der Voort ), and Aiyutaka and Touya, which are progenies of Gpa2 donor S. tuberosum ssp. andigena CPC 1673, were used. For Gro1-4, Alwara which possesses Gro1-4 (Biryukova ) and W872204, W872204-1 and W872204-2, which are progenies of S. spegazzinii, were used. The PCR condition for GpaIV was determined with Eden, which is known to have GpaIV (Moloney ) and Irida, P10111-1, W804421-3 and W862208-1, which are progenies of S. tuberosum ssp. andigena. Because we do not have varieties and lines known to have Grp1 and RGp5-vrnHC, we chose, Astarte, Elles, Magic Red, Mara and Starter, as they are progenies of several wild species, and show broad-spectrum resistance. Irish Cobbler and May Queen, which are considered to have no PCN resistance genes, were always used as PCN-susceptible genotypes. Because Marijke, Alwara and Eden do not exist in Japan, DNA of these varieties were provided by Dr. John Bamberg in USDA, ARS, University of Wisconsin.

DNA markers

DNA markers used in this study are shown in Table 1. Although Gpa2 has already been isolated and well characterized, DNA markers only linked to Gpa2 have been reported (van der Voort , 2000). Therefore, we developed DNA markers directly amplifying Gpa2. Gpa2 and its related genes (RGC1, RGC3, PSH-RGH6, PHS-RGH7 and Gpa2-like NBS-LRR protein) (van der Vossen ) were aligned using CLUSTALW, followed by manual alignment. We developed 2 markers (Gpa2-1 and Gpa2-2) amplifying specific regions of Gpa2. In addition to previously published marker, Gro1-4, we developed a more specific marker, Gro1-4-1, by aligning nucleotide sequences of Gro1-4 and genes of the Gro1 family (Gro1-1, Gro1-2, Gro1-3, Gro1-5, Gro1-6, Gro1-8, Gro1-10, Gro1-11, Gro1-12 and Gro1-14) (Paal ) using CLUSTALW.
Table 1

DNA markers and their optimal detection conditions in the individual and multiplex PCR assays

DNA markerTarget resistance genePrimer nameTypeEnzymePrimer sequence (5′→3′)Size (bp)Individual PCRMultiplex PCR


Conc. (μM)Annealing Temp. (°C)Conc. (μM)
N146H1N146-17SCARAAGCTCTTGCCTAGTGCTC5060.125550.2
N146-22AGGCGGAACATGCCATG0.1250.2
N195H1N195-09SCARTGGAAATGGCACCCACTA3370.125550.2
N195-06CATCATGGTTTCACTTGTCAC0.1250.2
Gro1-4Gro1-4Gro1-4FSCARTCTTTGGAGATACTGATTCTCA6020.458
Gro1-4RCGACCTAAAATGAAAAGCATCT0.4
Gro1-4-1Gro1-4Gro1-4-1FSTSAAGCCACAACTCTACTGGAG6020.2600.4
Gro1-4-1RGATATAGTACGTAATCATGCC0.20.4
Gpa2-1Gpa2Gpa2-1FSTSTTTAGCACGGAATGTGGGGA11200.260
Gpa2-1RGTTTCCCCATCAAAACTCAC0.2
Gpa2-2Gpa2Gpa2-2FSTSGCACTTAGAGACTCATTCCA4520.2600.2
Gpa2-2RACAGATTGTTGGCAGCGAAA0.20.2
TG432Grp1TG432-FCAPSRsaIGGACAGTCATCAGATTGTGG19000.266
TG432-RGTACTCCTGCTTGAGCCATT0.2
C237GpaIVSadgcontig237_fwdCAPSTaqIGCAGTCCTAATTGCACGTAACA4230.454
contig237_revCTTACTTGGGCAACCCAGAAT0.4
HCRGp5-vrnHCHC-FSNPACACCACCTGTTTGATAAAAAACT2760.460
HC-RGCCTTACTTCCCTGCTGAAG0.4
GBSS1-3GBSS1GBSS1-3FSTSAAAGGAGGCTCTTCAAGCAG8530.2600.4
GBSS1-3RTGCAAGAGCTCTAGCAACTG0.20.4

Individual PCR assays

The total volume in the individual PCR assays was 10 μL, including 2 μL template DNA, 5 μL gene amplification reagent (Ampdirect® Plus, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan), 0.25 units Taq DNA polymerase (BIOTAQTM HS; Bioline, London, UK) and the related primer pair shown in Table 1. Thermal cycling for Gro1-4-1, Gpa2-1, Gpa2-2 and GBSS1-3 was performed by using a 96-well thermal cycler (Veriti®; Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The PCR conditions consisted of 1 cycle of 10 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C and 1 min at 72°C and finally, 1 cycle of 5 min at 72°C. The PCR conditions for Gro1-4, HC, N146, N195, TG432 and C237 were as previously described (Finkers-Tomczak , Moloney , Paal , Sattarzadeh , Takeuchi ). PCR products of TG432 and C237 were digested with restriction endonucleases RsaI and TaqI, respectively. All PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.2–2% agarose gels in 1 × TAE buffer and visualized with SYBR SafeTM DNA gel stain (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and UV.

Results

Detection of resistance genes by individual PCR assays

N146 and N195 amplified expected-size bands (506 and 337 bp) in resistant varieties, Kita-akari, Touya and Haruka but not in Irish Cobbler and May Queen (Fig. 1A). Further, Gpa2-1 and Gpa2-2 amplified the expected-size bands (1120 and 452 bp, respectively) in Marijke, Touya and Aiyutaka but not in Irish Cobbler and May Queen (Fig. 1B). The expected-size band (602 bp) was amplified using published marker Gro1-4 only in Alwara; however, a slightly larger band was amplified in W872204 and W872204-2 (Fig. 1C). As the size difference is very slight, there is possibility that varieties or lines that have the larger band might be falsely judged as positive for Gro1-4. To avoid such erroneous decision, we developed a new PCR marker that specifically amplify Gro1-4 as described in Materials and Methods. The newly developed marker Gro1-4-1 amplified the expected 602-bp band only in Alwara (Fig. 1C). TG432, CAPS marker for Grp1, was tested with five resistant varieties (Astarte, Mara, Elles, Magic Red and Starter). However, we could not determine which band correlated with resistance (Fig. 2A). For the CAPS marker C237, Irida, P10111-1 and W804421-3 showed the same band pattern as positive control Eden; however, the negative control May Queen also showed the same pattern (Fig. 2B). HC did not yield a stable result; positive bands were also amplified in Irish Cobbler and May Queen irrespective of the PCR condition (Fig. 2C). Therefore, we finally used N146, N195, Gpa2-2 and Gro1-4-1 for evaluating the genetic resources.
Fig. 1

Development and optimization of DNA markers for PCN resistance genes. (A) DNA markers closely linked to H1 (N146 and N195). M, 100-bp marker; 1, Kita-akari; 2, Touya; 3, Haruka; 4, Irish Cobbler; 5, May Queen. (B) DNA markers directly amplifying Gpa2 (Gpa2-1 and Gpa2-2). M1 and M, 100-bp markers; M2, λ/HindIII marker; 1, Marijke; 2, Aiyutaka; 3, Touya; 4, Irish Cobbler; 5, May Queen. (C) DNA markers directly amplifying Gro1-4 (Gro1-4 and Gro1-4-1). The asterisk indicates nonspecific bands. M, 100-bp marker; 1, Alwara; 2, W872204; 3, W872204-1; 4, W872204-2; 5, Irish Cobbler; 6, May Queen.

Fig. 2

PCR assay by TG432, C237 and HC. (A) CAPS marker closely linked to Grp1 (TG432). M1, 100-bp marker; M2, λ/HindIII marker; 1, Astarte; 2, Mara; 3, Elles; 4, Magic Red; 5, Starter; 6, Irish Cobbler; 7, May Queen. (B) CAPS marker closely linked to GpaIV (C237). M, 100-bp markers; 1, Eden; 2, Irida; 3, W862208-1; 4, P10111-1; 5, W804421-3; 6, Irish Cobbler; 7, May Queen. (C) SNP marker closely linked to RGp5-vrnHC (HC). M, 100-bp marker; 1, Astarte; 2, Mara; 3, Elles; 4, Magic Red; 5, Starter; 6, Irish Cobbler; 7, May Queen.

Development of the multiplex PCR method

To avoid erroneous judgment by PCR errors, a marker amplifying granule-bound starch synthase 1 (GBSS1), GBSS1-3, was combined with N146, N195, Gpa2-2 and Gro1-4-1. GBSS1 is shared in all potato species (Spooner ), thus, it functions as a positive control to check whether the PCR was performed correctly (Mori ). DNAs isolated from Touya (H1 and Gpa2) and Alwara (Gro1-4 and Gpa2) were equally mixed (DNA mixture), and was used as samples. The multiplex PCR conditions were optimized by varying the primer and Taq DNA polymerase concentrations and annealing temperatures. Consequently, simultaneous amplification was achieved with the primer concentrations shown in Table 1, 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase and annealing temperature at 60°C (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Simultaneous detection of DNA markers for PCN resistance genes. M, 100-bp marker; 1, DNA mixture (Touya + Alwara); 2, Touya; 3, Alwara; 4, Irish Cobbler; 5, May Queen.

Detection sensitivity in the multiplex PCR method

To determine detection sensitivity of the multiple PCR method, the DNA mixture and DNA isolated from Irish Cobbler were assayed by the multiplex PCR method for a series of template DNA concentrations (60, 40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1.3 and 0.6 ng per 10 μL reaction). In the DNA mixture, all marker bands were detected at 1.3 ng or higher concentrations, and Gro1-4-1 was not detectable at 0.6 ng. In Irish Cobbler, GBSS1-3 band was detected at concentrations as low as 0.6 ng (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Detection sensitivity of the multiplex PCR method. Different concentrations of DNA mixture (upper panel) and DNA isolated from Irish Cobbler (lower panel) were used in each PCR. M, 100-bp marker.

The DNA concentration of 30 randomly selected samples ranged from 3.1 ng/μL to 41.7 ng/μL, with an average of 14.1 ng/μL (SD = 9.1). Because the DNA concentration of the smallest sample was much higher than the detectable range, 2 μL of these DNAs were used as template DNA in a 10 μL PCR without adjusting the concentration.

Evaluation of the genetic resources by the multiplex PCR method

The genetic resources were evaluated by the multiplex PCR method. As expected, N146 and N195 co-segregated perfectly. Of 812 varieties and lines, 264 varieties and lines were positive for the H1 markers (Table 2). Especially, these markers were detected in almost all varieties for which breeding program started after PCN invasion of Japan in 1972 (Table 3). We found 142 varieties and lines positive for the Gpa2 marker (Table 2). Of these, 117 varieties and lines were positive for both H1 and Gpa2 markers (Table 2). Among the varieties and a line mainly used as Japanese H1 resources (Tunika, Atlantic and R392-50), the Gpa2 marker was also detected in Atlantic and R392-50 but not in Tunika (Table 3, Fig. 5 and Supplemental Table 1). No accession was positive for the Gro1-4 marker (Table 2). None of the 3 markers were amplified in varieties such as Astarte, Mara and Magic Red, which are categorized as PCN resistant in The European Cultivated Potato Database or breeder’s evaluation (Supplemental Table 1).
Table 2

Evaluation summary of the 812 accessions

ResultsNo. of varieties and lines
Positive for N146 and N195264
Positive for Gpa2-2142
Positive for Gro1-4-10
Positive for N146, N195 and Gpa2-2117
Table 3

Evaluation of the varieties cultivated in Japan

VarietyPedigreeRelease yearResistance to Ro1Presence (+) or absence (−) of DNA markers


FemaleMaleN146, N195Gpa2-2Gro1-4-1
Irish CobbleraUnknownUnknownUnknownS
May QueenaHeraldS. rybiniiUnknownS
Red AndesEarly RoseS. phureja 253UnknownS
BenimaruLembke Frühe RosenPepo1938S
Norin 1Irish CobblerDeodara1943S
OjiroIrish CobblerNorin 11954S
EniwaShimakei 267Shimakei 2321961S
PrevalentaAmbassadeurLoman M 54 106 11966R++
TunikaaLü 56-186-21 NLü 51-183-21967R+
Hokkai 50Irish CobblerUSDA 96-561969S
MatildaaP134P1171970S
DejimaHokkai 31Unzen1971S
WaseshiroKonkei 7Hokkai 391974S
AstarteaSVP RR 62-5-43SVP VT5 62-69-51975R
AtlanticaWauseonLenape1976R++
ToyoshiroHokkai 19Eniwa1976S
SetoyutakaSaikai 10Unzen1977S
NishiyutakaDejimaChokei 651978S
ShepodyaBake KingF580501980S
HokkaikoganeToyoshiroHokkai 511981S
KonafubukiToyoshiroWB66201-101981S
Norking RussetaNooksackND9567-2 Russ1985S
Kita-akariIrish CobblerTunika1987R+
CynthiaaLandiaO’Sirene1989S
Jaga Kids Purple 90Red Andes Protoclone1990S
Jaga Kids RedRed Andes Protoclone1990S
SnowdenaB5141-6Wischip1990S
Red MoonUnknownUnknown1991S+
MusamaruTunikaKon-iku 201992R+
TouyaR392-50WB770025-21992R++
Aino-akaDejimaNorland1994S
Beni-akariHokkai 61R392-501994R+
SakurafubukiKonafubukiToyoakari1994R+
SayakaPentland DellR392-501995R++
Early StarchShimakei 523R392-501996R+
FugenmaruAtlanticP-71997R+
HanashibetsuS. andigena (553-4)R392-501997R++
AndoveraAlleganyAtlantic1998R++
TokachikoganeR392-369095-171999R++
Inca PurpleKW85091-21Shimakei 2842000S
Inca RedKW85093-33Shimakei 2842000S
YukirashaEarly Gem86002-1002000S+
KitahimeWhite FrierSayaka2001R++
Haru-akariT8973-20Fugenmaru2002R+
Inka-no-mezameW822229-5P10173-52002S
North ChipHokkaikoganeND860-22002S
AiyutakaDejimaChokei 1082003R++
Hikaru87062-217Maris Bard2003R+
NatsufubukiMusamaruShimakei 5442003R+
KitamurasakiShimakei 571Shimakei 5612004R++
Snow MarchAtlanticCherokee2004R++
Star RubyHokkai 7787028-62004R+
Okhotsk ChipAtlanticND860-22005R++
Ranran ChipTouya83068C-512005R++
YukitsuburaPentland DellTouya2005R+
Inka-no-hitomiInka-no-mezame NPb2006S
KoganemaruMusamaruTokachikogane2006R++
Northern RubyKitamurasaki NPb2006R++
Saya-akaneI-853Hanashibetsu2006R++
Shadow QueenKitamurasaki NPb2006S
KitakamuiYellow SharkTouya2007R++
Saikai 3196016-8Chokei 1152007S
HarukaT9020-8Sayaka2008R++
KonayukiBenimaruKon-iku 392011R++

S: susceptible, R: resistance.

Foreign cultivars.

NP, progeny from natural pollination.

Fig. 5

Evaluation of major varieties, major H1 donors and their progenies by the multiplex PCR method. M, 100-bp marker; 1, DNA mixture; 2, Irish cobbler; 3, May Queen; 4, Kita-akari; 5, Toyoshiro; 6, Touya; 7, Sayaka; 8, Konafubuki; 9, Atlantic; 10, Tunika; 11, R392-50; 12, Nishiyutaka; 13, Fugenmaru; 14, Aiyutaka; 15, Dejima; 16, Haruka.

Discussion

As expected, one-third of the varieties and lines in our genetic resources possess H1. Especially, most varieties recently bred in Japan possess H1 (Tables 2, 3 and Supplemental Table 1). Because Ro1 resistance is the priority for potato varieties in Japan, many varieties and lines inevitably have H1. Interestingly, many varieties and lines also possess Gpa2, although no selection for G. pallida resistance has been performed. Both H1 and Gpa2 were originally derived from the same S. tuberosum ssp. andigena CPC 1673 accession (van der Voort ). Atlantic (Wauseon × Lenape) and R392-50 (Hudson × Wauseon) both having Gpa2, probably derived from Wauseon, and their progenies are frequently used for breeding of recent resistant varieties. Their frequent use might have resulted in the presence of Gpa2 in many recent varieties and lines. Alternatively, Gpa2 is closely located (less than 200 kb apart) to the Potato virus X (PVX) resistance gene Rx1, and therefore, these genes are genetically linked (van der Vossen ). Along with PVX resistance, Gpa2 might also have been unconsciously introduced into many varieties. In fact, all varieties and a line with Rx1 (Aiyutaka, Atlantic, Kintoki-imo, Saco, Sayaka, Touya and Chokei 108) (Ohbayashi ), also have Gpa2 (Supplemental Table 1). In contrast to Gpa2, we could not find varieties and lines having Gro1-4, although our samples included PCN-resistant S. spegazzinii (PI 275143), a different accession of the S. spegazzinii and its progeny (W792224-1) (Supplemental Table 1). This fact emphasizes the importance of introduction of varieties or lines having Gro1-4 with a priority for our future safety. Our results revealed that only a very narrow genetic background in regard to the potato cyst nematode resistance resource has been used in Japanese potato breeding. Such a narrow genetic background of PCN resistance resources is disadvantageous from the viewpoint of breeding of novel PCN resistance varieties, because this may cause a bottleneck effect in the genetic background, and may result in the eventual genetic vulnerability of crops to the pest. Besides the 3 resistance genes analyzed in this study, we found other resistance genes in foreign varieties which are categorized as PCN resistant in the database and breeder’s evaluation. Their utilization and breeding of other novel resistant varieties should be promoted to broaden the genetic background in Japanese potato breeding. However, reliable DNA markers to detect these resistance genes have not developed yet. In fact, DNA markers TG432, C237 and HC were not applicable to the evaluation of resistant accessions in our study (Fig. 2). This is probably because of the complex genetic background of potato as pointed out by Milczarek . They tested the suitability of published molecular markers and suggested that most markers are inapplicable because of complex genetic backgrounds (Milczarek ). DNA markers that accurately identify these resistance should be developed for efficient breeding. Application of DNA markers for breeding has numerous advantages such as time saving, consistency, biosafety, efficiency and more accurate selection of complex traits (Collard , Jena and Mackill 2008). In this study we focused on the biosafety to prepare for PCN pathotypes not yet invading Japan. Usually, breeding programs target resistance to diseases and pests that are already epidemic in the region. In such cases, DNA markers are often used to reduce cost and time, to precisely and effectively evaluate complex traits and to simultaneously evaluate several resistance genes and pyramiding them. In fact, several studies that use marker-assisted selection target diseases already found in the area, and use DNA markers for such purpose (Biryukova , Gebhardt , Mori , Tan ). To the best of our knowledge, this is first attempt in potato breeding to use DNA markers for preparations to prevent diseases and pests from invading the country. If functions of other gene/genes such as complementary gene are essential for expression of the resistance, some varieties selected based on only DNA markers evaluation may not show resistance. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm whether some of the candidate varieties and lines show resistance by inoculating other pathotypes, but no other pathotypes exist in Japan at this time. However, if we breed varieties possessing resistance genes, we will be able to choose resistance varieties among them when other pathotypes invade. These varieties enable us to quickly respond to invasion by other pathotypes. Our study demonstrates that DNA markers can be used to select potentially resistant accessions in potato breeding before infestation by new pathogens. Indeed, in addition to G. rostochiensis Ro1 resistance, we found many varieties and lines possibly resistant to distinct populations of G. pallida. This approach may be applicable to other quarantine diseases such as Columbia root-knot nematode and potato wart, DNA markers of which resistance have already developed (Gebhardt , Zhang ). Moreover, because we evaluated many varieties used in potato breeding in Japan and several major varieties in the world, evaluation data in this study are very informative and useful for breeders. Breeders can devise schemes to breed novel resistance varieties based on these data. Furthermore, the multiplex PCR method developed in this study will contribute to efficient selection of ideal genotypes and facilitate breeding of novel resistant varieties.
  17 in total

1.  Homologues of a single resistance-gene cluster in potato confer resistance to distinct pathogens: a virus and a nematode.

Authors:  E A van der Vossen; J N van der Voort; K Kanyuka; A Bendahmane; H Sandbrink; D C Baulcombe; J Bakker; W J Stiekema; R M Klein-Lankhorst
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  Localization by restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping in potato of a major dominant gene conferring resistance to the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis.

Authors:  A Barone; E Ritter; U Schachtschabel; T Debener; F Salamini; C Gebhardt
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1990-11

3.  Development of diagnostic markers for use in breeding potatoes resistant to Globodera pallida pathotype Pa2/3 using germplasm derived from Solanum tuberosum ssp. andigena CPC 2802.

Authors:  Claire Moloney; Denis Griffin; Peter W Jones; Glenn J Bryan; Karen McLean; John E Bradshaw; Dan Milbourne
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Mapping of loci involved in quantitatively inherited resistance to the potato cyst-nematode Globodera rostochiensis pathotype Ro1.

Authors:  C M Kreike; J R de Koning; J H Vinke; J W van Ooijen; C Gebhardt; W J Stiekema
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Identification of RFLP markers closely linked to the H1 gene conferring resistance to Globodera rostochiensis in potato.

Authors:  C Gebhardt; D Mugniery; E Ritter; F Salamini; E Bonnel
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genetic and physical mapping of homologues of the virus resistance gene Rx1 and the cyst nematode resistance gene Gpa2 in potato.

Authors:  E Bakker; P Butterbach; J Rouppe van der Voort; E van der Vossen; J van Vliet; J Bakker; A Goverse
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  GpaXI ( tar ) ( l ) originating from Solanum tarijense is a major resistance locus to Globodera pallida and is localised on chromosome 11 of potato.

Authors:  M Y Adillah Tan; Tae-Ho Park; René Alles; Ronald C B Hutten; R G F Visser; Herman J van Eck
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  A high-resolution map of the Grp1 locus on chromosome V of potato harbouring broad-spectrum resistance to the cyst nematode species Globodera pallida and Globodera rostochiensis.

Authors:  Anna Finkers-Tomczak; Sarah Danan; Thijs van Dijk; Amelework Beyene; Liesbeth Bouwman; Hein Overmars; Herman van Eck; Aska Goverse; Jaap Bakker; Erin Bakker
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Mapping of QTLs involved in nematode resistance, tuber yield and root development in Solanum sp.

Authors:  C M Kreike; A A Kok-Westeneng; J H Vinke; W J Stiekema
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Quantitatively-inherited resistance toGlobodera pallida is dominated by one major locus inSolanum spegazzinii.

Authors:  C M Kreike; J R de Koning; J H Vinke; J W van Ooijen; W J Stiekema
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Challenges of breeding potato cultivars to grow in various environments and to meet different demands.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Mori; Kenji Asano; Seiji Tamiya; Takashi Nakao; Motoyuki Mori
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Differential expression of NBS-LRR-encoding genes in the root transcriptomes of two Solanum phureja genotypes with contrasting resistance to Globodera rostochiensis.

Authors:  Alex V Kochetov; Anastasiya Y Glagoleva; Kseniya V Strygina; Elena K Khlestkina; Sophia V Gerasimova; Salmaz M Ibragimova; Natalja V Shatskaya; Gennady V Vasilyev; Dmitry A Afonnikov; Nikolay A Shmakov; Olga Y Antonova; Tatyana A Gavrilenko; Natalia V Alpatyeva; Alexander Khiutti; Olga S Afanasenko
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 3.  Resisting Potato Cyst Nematodes With Resistance.

Authors:  Ulrike Gartner; Ingo Hein; Lynn H Brown; Xinwei Chen; Sophie Mantelin; Sanjeev K Sharma; Louise-Marie Dandurand; Joseph C Kuhl; John T Jones; Glenn J Bryan; Vivian C Blok
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  The relations of broad nematode resistance to quality characteristics as a consequence of marker-assisted selection in potato breeding programs.

Authors:  Dorota Milczarek; Anna Podlewska-Przetakiewicz; Jarosław Plich; Beata Tatarowska; Bogdan Flis
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Mapping and QTL Analysis of Early-Maturity Traits in Tetraploid Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).

Authors:  Xingcui Li; Jianfei Xu; Shaoguang Duan; Jiaojiao Zhang; Chunsong Bian; Jun Hu; Guangcun Li; Liping Jin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.