Literature DB >> 23136509

Evaluation of the effects of five QTL regions on Fusarium head blight resistance and agronomic traits in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Takako Suzuki1, Michinori Sato, Toru Takeuchi.   

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is an important disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The aim of this study was to determine the effects of quantitative trait locus (QTL) regions for resistance to FHB and estimate their effects on reducing FHB damage to wheat in Hokkaido, northern Japan. We examined 233 F(1)-derived doubled-haploid (DH) lines from a cross between 'Kukeiharu 14' and 'Sumai 3' to determine their reaction to FHB during two seasons under field conditions. The DH lines were genotyped at five known FHB-resistance QTL regions (on chromosomes 3BS, 5AS, 6BS, 2DL and 4BS) by using SSR markers. 'Sumai 3' alleles at the QTLs at 3BS and 5AS effectively reduced FHB damage in the environment of Hokkaido, indicating that these QTLs will be useful for breeding spring wheat cultivars suitable for Hokkaido. Some of the QTL regions influenced agronomic traits: 'Sumai 3' alleles at the 4BS and 5AS QTLs significantly increased stem length and spike length, that at the 2DL QTL significantly decreased grain weight, and that at the 6BS QTL significantly delayed heading, indicating pleiotropic or linkage effects between these agronomic traits and FHB resistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusarium head blight; QTL; agronomic traits; wheat

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136509      PMCID: PMC3405959          DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.62.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breed Sci        ISSN: 1344-7610            Impact factor:   2.086


Introduction

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a widespread and destructive disease of small-grain cereals. Apart from losses in grain yield and quality, the most serious threat of FHB is the contamination of the harvested grain with mycotoxins. Especially in Hokkaido, the northern island of Japan, FHB can dramatically reduce the quality and quantity of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), because the climate during the period from flowering to maturity is usually warm and humid, favoring FHB epidemics. Development of FHB-resistant cultivars is the most cost-effective method to control the disease. However breeding for FHB resistance has been difficult and costly because the inheritance of resistance to FHB is polygenic (Bai and Shaner 1994), and the expression of FHB symptoms varies depending on the environmental conditions. Therefore, DNA marker-assisted selection could complement classical breeding methods, because molecular markers should allow breeders to predict the presence or absence of a specific resistance gene in a breeding line independent of environmental conditions. Different types of FHB resistance have been described. Three types are generally accepted: resistance to initial infection (Type I), resistance to spread within the spike (Type II), and resistance to accumulation of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) (Type III) (Mesterhazy 1995). A number of quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping studies have analyzed the genetic control of FHB resistance, as recently reviewed by Buerstmayr , and the resistance has been re-analyzed using QTL analysis (Loeffler ). A major QTL for FHB resistance, Fhb1 (syn. Qfhs.ndsu-3BS), was mapped to the distal end of chromosome 3B in mapping populations derived from ‘Sumai 3’ and its derivatives (Liu ). The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at this QTL was associated with Type II resistance (Anderson , Buerstmayr , 2003, Yang ). Additional resistance QTLs in ‘Sumai 3’ and its derivatives have been mapped to chromosomes 5AS (Qfhs.ifa-5A; Buerstmayr , 2003) and 6BS (Anderson ). Qfhs.ifa-5A may contribute significantly to Type I resistance and slightly to Type II resistance, and the 6BS QTL was associated with Type II resistance (Buerstmayr ). QTLs for FHB resistance in the Chinese line ‘Wuhan 1’ (unknown pedigree) were mapped to 2DL and 4BS. Alleles of ‘Wuhan 1’ at these QTLs were associated with Type II resistance (Somers ). The Food Sanitation Council of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare set a provisional limit for DON content in unpolished wheat grains of 1.1 ppm in 2002, and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries stipulated that the percentage of FHB-damaged grains of wheat and barley used for food must be less than 0.05% (Nakajima ). It has therefore become important to develop wheat cultivars with low susceptibility to Fusarium infection and low DON content. The objective of this study was to elucidate which QTLs are available for use in breeding to develop improved cultivars suitable for the environment of Hokkaido. We developed 233 F1-derived doubled-haploid (DH) lines from the cross between ‘Kukeiharu 14’ and ‘Sumai 3’. The parents and DH lines were genotyped using SSR markers around these five QTLs and examined in field experiments for the percentage of Fusarium-damaged grains (FDG), the concentration of DON, the FHB severity, and several important agronomic traits. The ultimate goal of this work was to develop an efficient strategy for breeding to improve FHB resistance by examining the positive and negative effects of the QTLs on FHB resistance and agronomic traits.

Material and Methods

Plant materials

We used a population of recombinant F1-derived DH lines in this study. ‘Kukeiharu 14 (KH14)’ was developed at the Hokkaido Central Agricultural Experiment Station by a single cross between ‘Kitamiharu 56’ and ‘Roblin’. It matures early and its grains make high-quality bread, but it is susceptible to FHB. ‘Sumai 3’ is a Chinese FHB-resistant cultivar. ‘KH14’ and ‘Sumai 3’ were crossed in 2000. In 2001, 233 DH lines were developed from field-grown F1 plants by anther culture, as described by Shimada (1995).

Evaluation of FHB resistance and other agronomic traits

The DH population and the parental lines were grown in 2003 and 2004 in a field at the Hokkaido Central Agricultural Experiment Station, at Naganuma. FHB was evaluated in field experiments by natural infection only, since the wet conditions from flowering to maturity ensured that suitable levels of infection would occur. DH lines and parents were duplicated in a randomized complete block design. Each plot consisted of a single 1-m row at a 60-cm row spacing. Sowing density was 100 seeds per row. In 2003, 10 culms were randomly selected, and stem length and spike length were measured. The plants were harvested manually and the seed was threshed in a small threshing machine (Shirakawa Nouki, Japan) at low wind speed. The thousand-grain weight (TGW), percentage of Fusarium-damaged grains (FDG) and DON content (ppb) were measured. DON content was measured with a commercial ELISA kit (FA mycotoxin: DON + nivalenol; Kyowa Medex, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A second set of plots identical to the first set was added to obtain visual disease severity data. The nursery was irrigated by sprinkler for 5 min every hour from heading date to maturity. At 21 days after flowering, we collected 100 spikes per plot and counted the number of infected spikes and rated the infected spikelets on each symptomatic head on a scale of 0 (resistant, with 0% infection) to 10 (highly susceptible, with 100% infection) in 0.5-point increments as an infection index. Overall FHB severity was calculated as (index of infected spikes per plot) × (maximum index of infected spikelets per head).

DNA marker analysis

DNA was extracted from wheat leaves by using the CTAB method of Murray and Thompson (1980), with modifications. About 1 cm of leaf was put into a safe-lock tube (2.0 mL) containing 800 μL of modified 2% CTAB buffer (2% CTAB, 0.1 M Tris·HCl at pH 8.0, 20 mM EDTA at pH 8.0, 1.4 M NaCl) and a stainless steel bead (3 mm). The tube was shaken for 1 min on a Shake Master (Bio Medical Science, Inc., Japan) and then heated in an incubator at 60°C for 30 min. After cooling, 600 μL of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1 v/v) was added. The tube was shaken and then centrifuged for 15 min at 15 000 × g. Then 600 μL of the upper layer was moved into a new tube (1.5 mL) containing 400 μL of 2-propanol and the tube was shaken and then centrifuged for 15 min at 15 000 × g. The supernatant was discarded and the precipitated DNA pellet was dried for 30 min at room temperature and suspended in 400 μL of Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA at pH 8.0). We used microsatellite markers previously mapped around the FHB resistance QTLs identified on chromosomes 3BS, 5AS and 6BS in ‘Sumai 3’ and on chromosomes 2DL and 4B in ‘Wuhan 1’ (Bai , Gupta , McCartney , Röder , Somers ). PCR was performed in 10 μL of solution comprising 1 μL of the DNA template (about 50 ng), 2.5 U Taq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, USA), 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each dNTP, 0.02 μM forward primer, 0.18 μM 6-FAM/VIC/NED/PET-labeled M13 primer (5′-ACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC-3′, Applied Bio-systems) and 0.2 μM reverse primer. All forward microsatellite primers were modified to contain a 19-nucleotide 5′ M13 tail (5′-CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC-3′; Schuelke 2000). PCR amplification used an initial 94°C for 7 min; 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 48°C (Xgwm508, Xwmc105, Xwmc710) or 56°C (Xwmc601, Xgwm608, Xgwm539, Xwmc175, Xgwm389, Xgwm533, Xgwm493, Xwmc048, Xwmc238, Xgwm513, Xgwm293, Xwmc705, Xgwm304, Xwmc398, Xmc397) for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min and a final 72°C extension for 5 min. PCR products were separated and detected in an ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using the GeneScan software and GeneScan-500 LIZ as the size standard. The genotype at the Rht-B1 locus was determined by the method of Ellis , with modifications. PCR was performed in 10 μL of solution comprising 1 μL of template DNA, 0.5 U HotStar Taq polymerase (Qiagen, Germany), 1× HotStar Taq buffer, 200 μM each dNTP, and 0.4 μM each forward and reverse primer. PCR amplification used an initial 95°C for 15 min, 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 s and 68°C for 2 min and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were separated in 2% agarose gels and stained with SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Gel stain (Invitrogen, USA).

QTL analysis

The order of the SSR markers around the QTLs was determined by using the MAPMAKER/EXP ver. 3.0b software (Lander , Lincoln ). Simple interval mapping (SIM) was done with the Map Manager QTXb20 software (Manly and Olson 1999, Manly ). The SIM threshold was based on the results of 1000 permutation tests at the 5% level of significance.

Results

The mean values of FDG and DON of the DH lines in 2003 were 3.5× those in 2004, indicating a more severe FHB outbreak in 2003 (Table 1). The 24-h average temperature from heading to maturity (late June to late July) was 16°C in 2003 and 19°C in 2004. The estimated duration of sunshine was 171.9 h in 2003 and 191.1 h in 2004. The mean values of FDG and DON in the DH lines were higher than those of both parents. The mean value of Fusarium severity in the DH lines was in between those of the parents. Heading date differed by no more than 1 day between 2003 and 2004.
Table 1

Means and ranges of FHB traits and morphological traits of Sumai 3, Kukeiharu 14 and their DH lines

TraitSumai 3Kukeiharu 14DH lines

MeanMeanMeanRange
FDG 2003 (%)0.511.662.480.12–10.40
FDG 2004 (%)0.090.670.700.0–4.4
DON 2003 (ppb)114621132388334–15030
DON 2004 (ppb)228590686100–5606
FHB severitya 2004 (index)0.252511.80.25–68.0
Heading date 2003 (month.day)6.266.206.216.16–6.30
Heading date 2004 (month.day)6.266.216.226.17–6.28
Stem length 2003 (cm)101.365.376.144.3–110.9
Spike length 2003 (cm)9.57.08.66.2–11.8
TGW 2003 (g)38.238.337.826.7–50.3
TGW 2004 (g)34.135.334.324.5–43.8

FHB severity was tested in another field where plants were irrigated by sprinkler.

There were positive correlations (P = 0.01) between DON and both FDG and heading date in both years (Table 2). There was a positive correlation between FDG and heading date in 2003 but not in 2004. FHB severity was correlated with FDG and with all agronomic traits that we investigated. A negative correlation was found between FDG and spike length.
Table 2

Correlations of FHB traits and agronomic traits in the DH lines derived from the cross between KH14 and Sumai 3

TraitFDG 2003FDG 2004DON 2003DON 2004FHB severity 2004Heading date 2003Heading date 2004Stem length 2003Spike length 2003TGW 2003
FDG 20040.534**
DON 20030.728**0.484**
DON 20040.519**0.649**0.673**
FHB severity 20040.155*0.284**−0.0570.069
Heading date 20030.174**0.0220.438**0.277**−0.471**
Heading date 20040.104−0.0360.346**0.233**−0.498**0.853**
Stem length 2003−0.056−0.1090.097−0.012−0.308**0.194**0.251**
Spike length 2003−0.150*−0.275**−0.02−0.106−0.305**0.1110.131**0.551**
TGW 2003−0.0010.007−0.021−0.1010.222**−0.262**−0.140*0.334**0.222**
TGW 20040.1110.1160.090.0250.277**−0.262**−0.256**0.272**0.219**0.839**

Significantly different from 0 at P = 0.05;

significantly different from 0 at P = 0.01.

QTLs for FDG were detected on chromosomes 3BS and 5AS, for DON content at 3BS and for FHB severity at 2DL, 5AS and 4BS (Table 3 and Fig. 1). QTLs for agronomic traits were detected near the same regions except for 3BS: highly significant QTLs for heading date were detected at 4BS and 6BS, for stem length and spike length at 4BS and 5AS and for TGW at 2DL and 4BS (Table 3 and Fig. 1). Supplemental Table 1 summarizes the effects of the alleles on the measured traits. The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 2DL QTL decreased FHB severity by 0.8 to 7.5 percentage points, and decreased TGW by about 0 to 3.4 g. The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 3BS QTL decreased FDG by 0.21 to 0.55 percentage points and DON by more than 500 ppb for three of four markers. The 4BS region from ‘Sumai 3’ was associated with increased DON content (by around 400 ppb), a stem length increase of about 12 to 14 cm, a spike length increase of about 0.2 to 0.4 cm, and a TGW increase of about 1.9 to 2.5 g, and delayed heading by 1 day. The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 5AS QTL decreased FDG by about 0.6 percentage points, DON by about 260 ppb, and FHB severity by 3.4 to 5.5 units, and increased stem length by about 6 cm and spike length by about 0.4 cm. The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 6BS QTL delayed heading by 1 to 2 days (Supplemental Table 1).
Table 3

FHB resistance and morphological QTLs detected by simple interval mapping in a DH population from the cross between KH14 and Sumai 3

TraitChr.20032004


Flanking markersLODaPVEbAEcFlanking markersLODaPVEbAEc
FDG (%)d3BSXgwm533.1-Xgwm4933.60.07−0.45Xgwm533.1-Xgwm4932.10.04−0.16
5ASXwmc705-Xgwm3044.30.08−0.46Xwmc705-Xgwm3044.80.09−0.19

DON (ppb)3BSXgwm389-Xgwm533.12.90.05−519Xgwm389-Xgwm533.12.90.06−147
4BSXwmc710-Xgwm5132.50.05403

FHB severity (index)2DLXgwm608-Xwmc1754.80.09−7.93
4BSXwmc710-Xgwm5131.40.03−2.15
5ASXwmc705-Xgwm3042.60.05−2.83

Heading date (day)4BSXwmc710-Xgwm5133.50.081Xwmc710-Xgwm5131.80.041
6BSXgwm508-Xgwm3971.80.041Xgwm508-Xgwm3973.80.071

Stem length (cm)4BSXwmc710-Xgwm51318.90.327.95
5ASXwmc705-Xgwm3043.30.063.49

Spike length (cm)4BSXwmc710-Xgwm5131.60.030.24
5ASXwmc705-Xgwm3045.60.110.44

TGWe (g)2DLXgwm608-Xwmc17510.90.20−4.24Xgwm608-Xwmc1758.30.15−3.05
4BSXwmc710-Xgwm5135.20.101.55Xwmc710-Xgwm5133.50.071.00

The threshold logarithm of odds value was based on the results of 1000 permutation tests at the 5% level of significance.

Proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the detected QTLs.

Additive effect of Sumai 3 allele.

FDG: Fusarium-damaged grains.

TGW: thousand grain weight.

Fig. 1

Linkage map of QTLs for FHB resistance—FDG (Fusarium-damaged grains), DON (concentration of deoxynivalenol) and FHB severity —and QTLs for agronomic traits—heading date, stem length, spike length and TGW (thousand-grain weight). The white boxes correspond to the regions in which LOD > threshold by 1000 permutation tests in simple interval mapping. The gray bars correspond to the regions in which LOD > 2.5.

Lines with the ‘Sumai 3’ genotype at both 3BS and 5AS had significantly (P < 0.05) lower FDG, DON, and FHB severity and significantly greater stem length, spike length, and TGW than lines with the ‘KH14’ genotype at both loci (Table 4).
Table 4

Effect of alternative alleles at two QTL regions (3BS and 5AS) on FHB and agronomic traits

Allele typeaNo. of linesFDGb,c (%)DONb (ppb)FHB severityStem length (cm)Spike length (cm)TGW (g)

3BS5AS
Sumai 3Sumai 3521.09 a1162 a7.0 a80.9 a9.2 a36.9 a
Sumai 3KH14441.47 a1280 a12.9 b74.0 ab8.2 b35.9 b
KH14Sumai 3701.44 a1598 ab10.8 ab77.6 ab8.8 a36.1 ab
KH14KH14662.21 b1941 b15.8 b71.2 b8.0 b35.5 b

Genotypes were determined by Xgwm533.1 for the 3BS QTL and by Xgwm293 for the 5AS QTL.

Average of two years’ data (2003 (2004).

Values within a column followed by different letters are significantly different according to the Kruskal-Wallis test (P = 0.05).

Discussion

SIM detected five FHB resistance QTLs in the ‘Kukeiharu 14’ × ‘Sumai 3’ DH population. Our analysis found correlations between FHB resistance QTLs (except 3BS) and some morphological traits that segregated in the mapping population. We do not know whether the correlation indicates pleiotropic effects of the resistance QTLs or tight linkage of QTLs for resistance and plant development. Highly significant QTLs for FHB severity and TGW were detected around Xgwm539 at 2DL (Fig. 1) and the ‘Sumai 3’ allele decreased FHB severity (Table 3). Somers reported a QTL for Type I resistance at 2DL (the resistance allele in ‘Wuhan 1’). We believe that the 2DL region from ‘Sumai 3’ has the same effect as that from ‘Wuhan 1’, because our evaluation of FHB severity also investigated type I resistance. However, the ‘Sumai 3’ allele at this QTL decreased TGW (Table 3). If this represents linkage rather than a pleiotropic effect, this linkage needs to be broken by using a fine mapping approach. The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 3BS QTL strongly reduced FDG and DON (Table 3). The 3BS QTL has been widely validated by using ‘Sumai 3’ and its derivatives (Anderson , Buerstmayr , Yang , Zhou ). This QTL, named Fhb1, is known to contribute to Type II resistance (Cuthbert , Liu , Waldron ), and Fhb1 was fine-mapped as a major gene controlling FHB resistance (Cuthbert , Liu ). We believe that the FHB resistance QTL detected in the present study was Fhb1, but this should be confirmed by fine-scale mapping. The QTL was not significantly associated with the other agronomic traits that we tested (Table 3 and Fig. 1). Therefore, it can be used in applied breeding without undesirable effects on morphological characteristics. The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 4BS QTL decreased FHB severity (Table 3). Somers reported a QTL at 4BS for Type I resistance in ‘Wuhan 1’. Lin also detected a QTL for Type I resistance at 4BS in ‘Wangshuibai’. Our results suggest that ‘Sumai 3’, ‘Wuhan 1’ and ‘Wangshuibai’ share the same resistance allele at the 4BS QTL. However, the 4BS region from ‘Sumai 3’ was associated with increased DON content, stem length, spike length, and TGW and with delayed heading (Table 3 and Fig. 1). There may be many genes connected with agronomic traits in this region. For example, Somers mapped Rht-B1 at 4BS. ‘KH14’ carries Rht-B1b (which produces a semi-dwarf type) and ‘Sumai 3’ carries Rht-B1a (which produces the wild-type phenotype). Rht-B1b from ‘Soissons’ increased Type II resistance (Srinivasachary ). The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 4BS QTL might therefore decrease Type II resistance and consequently this allele might increase the DON content. The usefulness of the 4BS QTL in wheat breeding therefore needs further investigation. Previous studies detected QTLs for Types I and II resistance at 5AS (Buerstmayr , 2003, Yang ). The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 5AS QTL decreased FDG, DON and FHB severity and increased stem length and spike length. Taller lines might escape infection because their spikes are further from fungi in the soil and are exposed to lower humidity (Somers ). Therefore, it is important to consider possible pleiotropic effects of plant development on FHB infection. DH lines with the ‘Sumai 3’ allele for the 5AS QTL were about 7 cm taller than those with the ‘KH14’ allele (Table 4). If FHB resistance and plant height are controlled by different QTLs, we must develop recombinant lines to break the linkage between resistance QTLs and plant height QTLs. Fhb5, which is the FHB resistance QTL at 5AS in ‘Wangshuibai’, has been fine-mapped (Xue ) within a 0.3-cM interval. Fine mapping can facilitate the development of recombinant lines that can be used to break or reduce this kind of linkage. Fhb2, which confers field resistance to FHB, was mapped at 6BS (Cuthbert ). A QTL for heading date was mapped near Fhb2 by using recombinant inbred lines derived from the cross between ‘Ning7840’ (a ‘Sumai 3’ derivative) and ‘Clark’ (Marza ). The ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 6BS QTL delayed heading by 1 day (Supplemental Table 1). We found a positive correlation between FDG and heading date in 2003, so the effect of the 6BS region on FHB resistance might have been partly masked by its effect on heading date. Overall, the effect of the 6BS QTL was relatively small in the ‘Sumai 3’ × ‘KH14’ progeny that we investigated. FDG and DON were higher in 2003 than in 2004 (Table 1). The duration of sunshine was shorter in 2003, possibly increasing natural infection. The average temperature from heading to maturity was lower in 2003. The optimum temperature for infection is about 28°C for both Fusarium graminearum (DON-producing) and Fusarium avenaceum (not DON-producing), but the minimum temperature required for infection is lower for F. graminearum (Rossi ). Although we did not investigate the species of fungus, the DON data suggest that infection by F. graminearum was higher in 2003 than in 2004. The mean FDG and DON values in the DH lines were higher than the values in the susceptible parent (Table 1). ‘KH14’ (an early-heading line) had lower FDG and DON even though it is susceptible, since there were positive correlations between FDG and heading date in 2003 and between DON and heading date in 2003 and 2004 (Table 2). The significant correlation of FHB severity with FDG and with all agronomic traits that we investigated (Table 2) suggests that FHB resistance is closely related to agronomic traits. There were correlations between the locations of loci for FHB resistance and those for morphological traits (Fig. 1). DH lines with the ‘Sumai 3’ alleles at both the 3BS and 5AS QTLs had significantly increased stem length, spike length, and TGW and significantly less FDG (Table 4). Lines with the ‘Sumai 3’ allele at the 2DL QTL had decreased FHB severity and TGW (Supplemental Table 1). In our breeding strategy, we first discarded lines with tall plants because the semi-dwarf phenotype resists lodging and is preferred under Japanese conditions, and then selected lines with a low score for FHB severity. Because of this strategy, we might have discarded FHB-resistant lines because of their plant height, and might have selected lines with small grains and a low score for FHB severity. Therefore, our strategy has not developed FHB-resistant lines with the same agricultural performance as leading cultivars that are adapted to Hokkaido conditions. Buerstmayr , 2003) stated that the two QTLs at 3BS and 5AS together explained 40 to 48% of the phenotypic variance, depending on the FHB resistance trait, in a DH population derived from ‘CM-82036’ × ‘Remus’. The lines with ‘Sumai 3’ genotypes at both 3BS and 5AS had significantly reduced FDG, DON and FHB severity (Table 4). We could consequently utilize the QTLs at 3BS and 5AS for developing FHB-resistant wheat cultivars. These QTLs conferred higher efficacy against FHB than the other three QTLs that we investigated, and showed significantly greater effects in combination (Table 4). Salameh reported no systematic negative effect on grain yield, TGW, hectoliter weight and protein content in European winter wheat lines that contained the 3BS and 5AS QTLs from ‘CM-82036’. These two QTLs therefore appear to be the most promising candidates for use in marker-assisted selection, which fully agrees with the conclusions of Buerstmayr and Chen . Further detailed analysis of all five QTLs will be required to overcome the problem of their tight linkage to agronomic traits with negative effects for the breeding of wheat cultivars that are strongly resistant to FHB.
  23 in total

1.  Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping.

Authors:  K F Manly; R H Cudmore; J M Meer
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Molecular mapping of QTLs for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat. I. Resistance to fungal spread (Type II resistance).

Authors:  H Buerstmayr; M Lemmens; L Hartl; L Doldi; B Steiner; M Stierschneider; P Ruckenbauer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Haplotype diversity at fusarium head blight resistance QTLs in wheat.

Authors:  C A McCartney; D J Somers; G Fedak; W Cao
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Complex microcolinearity among wheat, rice, and barley revealed by fine mapping of the genomic region harboring a major QTL for resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat.

Authors:  Sixin Liu; Xiuling Zhang; Michael O Pumphrey; Robert W Stack; Bikram S Gill; James A Anderson
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 3.410

5.  Semi-dwarfing Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 loci of wheat differ significantly in their influence on resistance to Fusarium head blight.

Authors:  N Gosman; A Steed; T W Hollins; R Bayles; P Jennings; P Nicholson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Quantitative trait loci for yield and related traits in the wheat population Ning7840 x Clark.

Authors:  F Marza; G-H Bai; B F Carver; W-C Zhou
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA.

Authors:  M G Murray; W F Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Mapping of Fhb2 on chromosome 6BS: a gene controlling Fusarium head blight field resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Patricia A Cuthbert; Daryl J Somers; Anita Brulé-Babel
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Fine mapping Fhb1, a major gene controlling fusarium head blight resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Patricia A Cuthbert; Daryl J Somers; Julian Thomas; Sylvie Cloutier; Anita Brulé-Babel
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations.

Authors:  E S Lander; P Green; J Abrahamson; A Barlow; M J Daly; S E Lincoln; L A Newberg; L Newburg
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparative Transcriptome Profiles of Near-Isogenic Hexaploid Wheat Lines Differing for Effective Alleles at the 2DL FHB Resistance QTL.

Authors:  Chiara Biselli; Paolo Bagnaresi; Primetta Faccioli; Xinkun Hu; Margaret Balcerzak; Maria G Mattera; Zehong Yan; Therese Ouellet; Luigi Cattivelli; Giampiero Valè
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 2.  Fusarium head blight in wheat: contemporary status and molecular approaches.

Authors:  Mohd Kamran Khan; Anamika Pandey; Tabinda Athar; Saumya Choudhary; Ravi Deval; Sait Gezgin; Mehmet Hamurcu; Ali Topal; Emel Atmaca; Pamela Aracena Santos; Makbule Rumeysa Omay; Hatice Suslu; Kamer Gulcan; Merve Inanc; Mahinur S Akkaya; Abdullah Kahraman; George Thomas
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  HL2 on chromosome 7D of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) regulates both head length and spikelet number.

Authors:  Hongni Yao; Quan Xie; Shulin Xue; Jing Luo; Jikang Lu; Zhongxin Kong; Yongpan Wang; Wenling Zhai; Nan Lu; Rong Wei; Yang Yang; Yuzhou Han; Yong Zhang; Haiyan Jia; Zhengqiang Ma
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Fine mapping of the major Soybean dwarf virus resistance gene Rsdv1 of the soybean cultivar 'Wilis'.

Authors:  Yoko Yamashita; Toru Takeuchi; Shizen Ohnishi; Jun Sasaki; Akiko Tazawa
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Variations for Fusarium head blight resistance associated with genomic diversity in different sources of the resistant wheat cultivar 'Sumai 3'.

Authors:  Sayaka Niwa; Katashi Kubo; Janet Lewis; Rie Kikuchi; Manickavelu Alagu; Tomohiro Ban
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  A single QTL on chromosome 6DS derived from a winter wheat cultivar 'OW104' confers resistance to Wheat yellow mosaic virus.

Authors:  Yoko Yamashita; Chihiro Souma; Reina Ogura; Takako Suzuki
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Fine-mapping of the Fusarium head blight resistance QTL Qfhs.ifa-5A identifies two resistance QTL associated with anther extrusion.

Authors:  Barbara Steiner; Maria Buerstmayr; Christian Wagner; Andrea Danler; Babur Eshonkulov; Magdalena Ehn; Hermann Buerstmayr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Field assessment of a major QTL associated with tolerance to cold-induced seed coat discoloration in soybean.

Authors:  Naoya Yamaguchi; Seiji Hagihara; Dai Hirai
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Development and validation of DNA markers linked to Sdvy-1, a common bean gene conferring resistance to the yellowing strain of Soybean dwarf virus.

Authors:  Yoko Yamashita; Toru Takeuchi; Masataka Okuyama; Jun Sasaki; Kakumasa Onodera; Mikako Sato; Chihiro Souma; Shigehiko Ebe
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Canopy and Ear Traits Associated With Avoidance of Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat.

Authors:  Stephen Jones; Arifa Farooqi; John Foulkes; Debbie L Sparkes; Robert Linforth; Rumiana V Ray
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.