PURPOSE: This study was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of etirinotecan pegol. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with refractory solid malignancies were enrolled and assigned to escalating-dose cohorts. Patients received 1 infusion of etirinotecan pegol weekly 3 times every 4 weeks (w × 3q4w), or every 14 days (q14d), or every 21 days (q21d), with MTD as the primary end point using a standard 3 + 3 design. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were entered onto 3 dosing schedules (58-245 mg/m(2)). The MTD was 115 mg/m(2) for the w × 3q4w schedule and 145 mg/m(2) for both the q14d and q21d schedules. Most adverse events related to study drug were gastrointestinal disorders and were more frequent at higher doses of etirinotecan pegol. Late onset diarrhea was observed in some patients, the frequency of which generally correlated with dose density. Cholinergic diarrhea commonly seen with irinotecan treatment did not occur in patients treated with etirinotecan pegol. Etirinotecan pegol administration resulted in sustained and controlled systemic exposure to SN-38, which had a mean half-life of approximately 50 days. Overall, the pharmacokinetics of etirinotecan pegol are predictable and do not require complex dosing adjustments. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 8 patients with breast, colon, lung (small and squamous cell), bladder, cervical, and neuroendocrine cancer. CONCLUSION: Etirinotecan pegol showed substantial antitumor activity in patients with various solid tumors and a somewhat different safety profile compared with the irinotecan historical profile. The MTD recommended for phase II clinical trials is 145 mg/m(2) q14d or q21d.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of etirinotecan pegol. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients with refractory solid malignancies were enrolled and assigned to escalating-dose cohorts. Patients received 1 infusion of etirinotecan pegol weekly 3 times every 4 weeks (w × 3q4w), or every 14 days (q14d), or every 21 days (q21d), with MTD as the primary end point using a standard 3 + 3 design. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were entered onto 3 dosing schedules (58-245 mg/m(2)). The MTD was 115 mg/m(2) for the w × 3q4w schedule and 145 mg/m(2) for both the q14d and q21d schedules. Most adverse events related to study drug were gastrointestinal disorders and were more frequent at higher doses of etirinotecan pegol. Late onset diarrhea was observed in some patients, the frequency of which generally correlated with dose density. Cholinergic diarrhea commonly seen with irinotecan treatment did not occur in patients treated with etirinotecan pegol. Etirinotecan pegol administration resulted in sustained and controlled systemic exposure to SN-38, which had a mean half-life of approximately 50 days. Overall, the pharmacokinetics of etirinotecan pegol are predictable and do not require complex dosing adjustments. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 8 patients with breast, colon, lung (small and squamous cell), bladder, cervical, and neuroendocrine cancer. CONCLUSION:Etirinotecan pegol showed substantial antitumor activity in patients with various solid tumors and a somewhat different safety profile compared with the irinotecan historical profile. The MTD recommended for phase II clinical trials is 145 mg/m(2) q14d or q21d.
Authors: Bret D Wallace; Hongwei Wang; Kimberly T Lane; John E Scott; Jillian Orans; Ja Seol Koo; Madhukumar Venkatesh; Christian Jobin; Li-An Yeh; Sridhar Mani; Matthew R Redinbo Journal: Science Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael Michael; MaryAnne Brittain; Jane Nagai; Ronald Feld; David Hedley; Amit Oza; Lillian Siu; Malcolm J Moore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H A Burris; A R Hanauske; R K Johnson; M H Marshall; J G Kuhn; S G Hilsenbeck; D D Von Hoff Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1992-12-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: D Abigerges; J P Armand; G G Chabot; L Da Costa; E Fadel; C Cote; P Hérait; D Gandia Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1994-03-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Debu Tripathy; Sara M Tolaney; Andrew D Seidman; Carey K Anders; Nuhad Ibrahim; Hope S Rugo; Chris Twelves; Veronique Dieras; Volkmar Müller; Mary Tagliaferri; Alison L Hannah; Javier Cortés Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: Heinz-Josef Lenz; Philip Philip; Mark Saunders; Tatjana Kolevska; Kalyan Mukherjee; Leslie Samuel; Shailesh Bondarde; Tracy Dobbs; Mary Tagliaferri; Ute Hoch; Alison L Hannah; Maurice Berkowitz Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Ignace B Vergote; Agustin Garcia; John Micha; Charles Pippitt; Johanna Bendell; Daniel Spitz; Nicholas Reed; Graham Dark; Paula M Fracasso; Emad N Ibrahim; Vincent A Armenio; Linda Duska; Chris Poole; Christine Gennigens; Luc Y Dirix; Abraham C F Leung; Carol Zhao; Raoudha Soufi-Mahjoubi; Gordon Rustin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan Stenvang; Iben Kümler; Sune Boris Nygård; David Hersi Smith; Dorte Nielsen; Nils Brünner; José M A Moreira Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2013-12-25 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Chris E Adkins; Mohamed I Nounou; Tanvirul Hye; Afroz S Mohammad; Tori Terrell-Hall; Neel K Mohan; Michael A Eldon; Ute Hoch; Paul R Lockman Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Javier Cortés; Hope S Rugo; Chris Twelves; Ahmad Awada; Edith A Perez; Seock-Ah Im; Carol Zhao; Ute Hoch; Denise Tomkinson; James Buchanan; Mary Tagliaferri; Alison Hannah; Joyce O'Shaughnessy Journal: Springerplus Date: 2016-07-08