Literature DB >> 23136193

Development of [(11)C]erlotinib positron emission tomography for in vivo evaluation of EGF receptor mutational status.

Idris Bahce1, Egbert F Smit, Mark Lubberink, Astrid A M van der Veldt, Maqsood Yaqub, Albert D Windhorst, Robert C Schuit, Erik Thunnissen, Daniëlle A M Heideman, Pieter E Postmus, Adriaan A Lammertsma, N Harry Hendrikse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether, in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), tumor uptake of [(11)C]erlotinib can be quantified and imaged using positron emission tomography and to assess whether the level of tracer uptake corresponds with the presence of activating tumor EGF receptor (EGFR) mutations. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Ten patients with NSCLCs, five with an EGFR exon 19 deletion, and five without were scanned twice (test retest) on the same day with an interval of at least 4 hours. Each scanning procedure included a low-dose computed tomographic scan, a 10-minute dynamic [(15)O]H(2)O scan, and a 1-hour dynamic [(11)C]erlotinib scan. Data were analyzed using full tracer kinetic modeling. EGFR expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: The quantitative measure of [(11)C]erlotinib uptake, that is, volume of distribution (V(T)), was significantly higher in tumors with activating mutations, that is, all with exon 19 deletions (median V(T), 1.76; range, 1.25-2.93), than in those without activating mutations (median V(T), 1.06; range, 0.67-1.22) for both test and retest data (P = 0.014 and P = 0.009, respectively). Good reproducibility of [(11)C]erlotinib V(T) was seen (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.88). Intergroup differences in [(11)C]erlotinib uptake were not correlated with EGFR expression levels, nor tumor blood flow.
CONCLUSION: [(11)C]erlotinib V(T) was significantly higher in NSCLCs tumors with EGFR exon 19 deletions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136193     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  40 in total

1.  Novel derivatives of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors: Synthesis, radiolabeling, and preliminary biological studies of fluoroethyl analogues of crizotinib, alectinib, and ceritinib.

Authors:  Bhasker Radaram; Federica Pisaneschi; Yi Rao; Ping Yang; David Piwnica-Worms; Mian M Alauddin
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Quantitative analysis of [11C]-erlotinib PET demonstrates specific binding for activating mutations of the EGFR kinase domain.

Authors:  J Ryan Petrulli; Jenna M Sullivan; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Daniel C Bennett; Jonathan Charest; Yiyun Huang; Evan D Morris; Joseph N Contessa
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 3.  PET Imaging of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Cancer.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Dalong Ni; Emily B Ehlerding; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  The promise of multiparametric imaging in oncology: how do we move forward?

Authors:  Aniek J G Even; Dirk De Ruysscher; Wouter van Elmpt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Quantitative in vivo cell-surface receptor imaging in oncology: kinetic modeling and paired-agent principles from nuclear medicine and optical imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth M Tichauer; Yu Wang; Brian W Pogue; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Developing biomarker-specific end points in lung cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Joel W Neal; Justin F Gainor; Alice T Shaw
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  18F-Labeled Pyrido[3,4-d]pyrimidine as an Effective Probe for Imaging of L858R Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kimura; Haruka Okuda; Masumi Ishiguro; Kenji Arimitsu; Akira Makino; Ryuichi Nishii; Anna Miyazaki; Yusuke Yagi; Hiroyuki Watanabe; Ikuo Kawasaki; Masahiro Ono; Hideo Saji
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  64Cu-Labeled Gp2 Domain for PET Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.

Authors:  Max A Kruziki; Brett A Case; Jie Y Chan; Elizabeth J Zudock; Daniel R Woldring; Douglas Yee; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Role of [¹⁸F]FDG PET in prediction of KRAS and EGFR mutation status in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Caicedo; Maria Jose Garcia-Velloso; Maria Dolores Lozano; Tania Labiano; Carmen Vigil Diaz; Jose Maria Lopez-Picazo; Alfonso Gurpide; Javier J Zulueta; Javier Zulueta; Jose Angel Richter Echevarria; Jose Luis Perez Gracia
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Evaluation of quantitative modeling methods in whole-body, dynamic [11C]-erlotinib PET.

Authors:  Joseph Ryan Petrulli; Mingqiang Zheng; Yiyun Huang; Nabeel B Nabulsi; Sarah B Goldberg; Joseph N Contessa; Evan D Morris
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.