Literature DB >> 23135779

Determinants of patient screen failures in Phase 1 clinical trials.

Alexandra Mckane1, Chao Sima, Ramesh K Ramanathan, Gayle Jameson, Cathy Mast, Erica White, Sharon Fleck, Molly Downhour, Daniel D Von Hoff, Glen J Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Certain eligibility criteria for Phase 1 cancer clinical trials may impede successful patient enrollment onto a study. We evaluated patient-specific or study-specific reasons for screen failures on Phase 1 oncology clinical trials and discuss factors which may inhibit subject enrollment.
METHODS: Thirty-eight Phase 1 clinical trials for solid tumors meeting eligibility criteria and opened for enrollment between February 2006 and February 2011 at one oncology Phase 1 program were examined. Categorical reasons for screen failures and patients' demographics were examined and compared to characteristics of patients that successfully enrolled on a Phase 1 trial.
RESULTS: There were a total of 583 successful Phase 1 enrollment and dose administration events out of 773 Phase 1 consent events (75.4 % dose success rate). The three most common reasons for screen failure were: out of protocol-specified range for chemistry, development of an interval medical issue that precluded proceeding with study participation, and subject declining participation after signing consent. Living further away from the Phase 1 program and receipt of fewer prior lines of systemic chemotherapy were significantly associated with increased screen failures.
CONCLUSION: Screen failures for Phase 1 studies are not uncommon (24.6 %). When a protocol required tumor or host analyte is not required, most screen failures are due to out of protocol-specified range for chemistry or the development of an interval medical issue. Screen failure rates were increased when patients had longer travel distances and fewer prior lines of systemic chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23135779     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-012-9894-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  5 in total

1.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Eunice L Kwak; Yung-Jue Bang; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Benjamin Solomon; Robert G Maki; Sai-Hong I Ou; Bruce J Dezube; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Woo-Ho Kim; Thomas J Lynch; Panos Fidias; Hannah Stubbs; Jeffrey A Engelman; Lecia V Sequist; WeiWei Tan; Leena Gandhi; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Greg C Wei; S Martin Shreeve; Mark J Ratain; Jeffrey Settleman; James G Christensen; Daniel A Haber; Keith Wilner; Ravi Salgia; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Eligibility of patients with brain metastases for phase I trials: time for a rethink?

Authors:  Craig P Carden; Roshan Agarwal; Frank Saran; Ian R Judson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Early participant attrition from clinical trials: role of trial design and logistics.

Authors:  Azfar-E-Alam Siddiqi; Alla Sikorskii; Charles W Given; Barbara Given
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Computational challenges and human factors influencing the design and use of clinical research participant eligibility pre-screening tools.

Authors:  Taylor R Pressler; Po-Yin Yen; Jing Ding; Jianhua Liu; Peter J Embi; Philip R O Payne
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Barriers in phase I cancer clinical trials referrals and enrollment: five-year experience at the Princess Margaret Hospital.

Authors:  Jeremy Ho; Gregory R Pond; Colin Newman; Martha Maclean; Eric X Chen; Amit M Oza; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Access to early-phase clinical trials in older patients with cancer in France: the EGALICAN-2 study.

Authors:  C Baldini; E Charton; E Schultz; L Auroy; A Italiano; M Robert; E Coquan; N Isambert; P Moreau; S Le Gouill; C Le Tourneau; Z Ghrieb; J J Kiladjian; J P Delord; C Gomez Roca; N Vey; F Barlesi; T Lesimple; N Penel; J C Soria; C Massard; S Besle
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Analysis of the reasons for screening failure in phase I clinical trials in China: a retrospective study of the clinical trials screening process.

Authors:  Bin Li; Qian Zhang; Yuanyuan Liu; Xiaolei Zhang; Dongmei Cheng; Aolin Li; Yubing Chen; Xingyu Zhu; Yue Su; Huan Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10

3.  A Case-Control Study Brings to Light the Causes of Screen Failures in Phase 1 Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Kempf; Nathalie Lemoine; Gabrielle Tergemina-Clain; Anthony Turpin; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Emilie Lanoy; Jean-Charles Soria; Christophe Massard; Antoine Hollebecque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Recruitment, outcomes, and toxicity trends in phase I oncology trials: Six-year experience in a large institution.

Authors:  Siddharth Menon; Amy Davies; Sophia Frentzas; Cheryl-Ann Hawkins; Eva Segelov; Daphne Day; Ben Markman
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.