Literature DB >> 23135483

Use of biological prostheses in transplant patients with incisional hernias. Preliminary experience.

Michele L Santangelo, Nicola Carlomagno, Sergio Spiezia, Danilox Danilo Palmieri, Marco Clemente, Maria Pina Piantadosi, Francescopaolo Palumbo, Giovanni Docimo, Nicola Normanno, Andrea X Andrea Renda.   

Abstract

AIM: The use of synthetic mesh in transplant patients is still under debate. In this paper the authors report their preliminary experience on biological prosthesis for surgical treatment of incisional hernias in transplant patients. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Between 2009-2010, 10 patients with incisional hernia underwent surgery using a biological prosthesis (porcine dermis collagen). All patients were transplanted: 9 kidney transplants and 1 liver transplant.
RESULTS: In all patients postoperative course was uneventful and were not observed complications related to surgery, kind of prosthesis or transplanted organs. At follow up, laparoplasty was associated with good functional outcome. DISCUSSION: Transplant patients are at risk for use of synthetic prostheses, as immunosuppressed. In our preliminary experience biological prostheses compared to synthetic ones showed a greater ability to integrate into tissues, to resist bacterial colonization and to reduce cytotoxic or allergenic reactions, providing similar functional results. Moreover it must be added that biological prostheses did not require reductions/suspensions of immunosuppressive therapy and resulted to be versatile. All these features are particularly sought in incisional hernias surgery of transplanted patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery of incisional hernias in transplanted patients requires a prosthesis with characteristics as close as possible to the ideal one and, in this sense, biological prostheses would seem to outweigh synthetic ones. In our experience, biological prostheses have shown to be safe, effective and reliable; therefore they seem to be able to open new horizons in the treatment of wall defects in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23135483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ital Chir        ISSN: 0003-469X            Impact factor:   0.766


  5 in total

1.  Abdominal wall defect repair with biological prosthesis in transplanted patients: single center retrospective analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena; Valentina R Bertuzzo; Giorgio Ercolani; Antonio Pinna; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-05-01

2.  A multidisciplinary approach to an unusual medical case of locally advanced gastric cancer: a case report.

Authors:  Nicola Carlomagno; Fabrizio Schonauer; Vincenzo Tammaro; Annalena Di Martino; Carmen Criscitiello; Michele L Santangelo
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-26

3.  Utility of a modified components separation for abdominal wall reconstruction in the liver and kidney transplant population.

Authors:  Cara K Black; Elizabeth G Zolper; Elliot T Walters; Jessica Wang; Jesus Martinez; Andrew Tran; Iram Naz; Vikas Kotha; Paul J Kim; Sarah R Sher; Karen K Evans
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2019-09-15

Review 4.  Abdominal wall complications after kidney transplantation: A clinical review.

Authors:  Rossella Gioco; Claudio Sanfilippo; Pierfrancesco Veroux; Daniela Corona; Francesca Privitera; Alberto Brolese; Francesco Ciarleglio; Alessio Volpicelli; Massimiliano Veroux
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.456

5.  What Kind of Incision Should Be Made to Reduce the Risk of Incisional Hernia in Kidney Transplantation?

Authors:  Ihsan Yildız; Yavuz Savas Koca
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.