Literature DB >> 23135212

Novel predictors of sepsis outperform the American Burn Association sepsis criteria in the burn intensive care unit patient.

Elizabeth A Mann-Salinas1, Mara M Baun, Janet C Meininger, Clinton K Murray, James K Aden, Steven E Wolf, Charles E Wade.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and American Burn Association (ABA) criteria predict sepsis in the burn patient and develop a model representing the best combination of novel clinical sepsis predictors. A retrospective, case-controlled, within-patient comparison of burn patients admitted to a single intensive care unit from January 2005 to September 2010 was made. Blood culture results were paired with documented sepsis: positive-sick, negative-sick (collectively defined as sick), and negative-not sick. Data for all predictors were collected for the 72 hours before blood culture. Variables were evaluated using regression and area under the curve (AUC) analyses. Fifty-nine subjects represented 177 culture periods. SIRS criteria were not discriminative: 98% of the subjects met criteria. ABA sepsis criteria were different on the day before (P = .004). The six best-fit variables identified for the model included heart rate > 130 beats per min, mean arterial pressure < 60 mm Hg, base deficit < -6 mEq/L, temperature < 36°C, use of vasoactive medications, and glucose > 150 mg/dl. The model was significant in predicting positive-sick and sick, with an AUC of 0.775 (P < .001) and 0.714 (P < .001), respectively; comparatively, the ABA criteria AUC was 0.619 (P = .028) and 0.597 (P = .035), respectively. Usefulness of the ABA criteria to predict sepsis is limited to the day before blood culture is obtained. A significant contribution of this research is the identification of six novel sepsis predictors for the burn patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23135212     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31826450b5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  15 in total

1.  Outcomes in Burn-Injured Patients Who Develop Sepsis.

Authors:  Megan A Rech; Michael J Mosier; Kevin McConkey; Susan Zelisko; Giora Netzer; Elizabeth J Kovacs; Majid Afshar
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 2.  Fungal infections in burns: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  M F Struck; J Gille
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2013-09-30

Review 3.  Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients.

Authors:  Roohi Vinaik; Dalia Barayan; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  A sirs-based automated alarm system for the diagnosis of sepsis after burn injury.

Authors:  J Gille; A Dietz; H Taha; A Sablotzki
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2017-09-30

5.  Comparison of Automated Methods Versus the American Burn Association Sepsis Definition to Identify Sepsis and Sepsis With Organ Dysfunction/Septic Shock in Burn-Injured Adults.

Authors:  Megan A Rech; Michael J Mosier; Susan Zelisko; Giora Netzer; Elizabeth J Kovacs; Majid Afshar
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Clinical Sepsis Criteria to Protein Biomarkers Reveals a Role for Vascular Dysfunction in Burn Sepsis.

Authors:  David M Burmeister; Tiffany C Heard; Tony Chao; Karl Alcover; Amanda Wagner; Kevin K Chung; Kevin S Akers
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  EVALUATING SEPSIS CRITERIA IN DETECTING ALTERATIONS IN CLINICAL, METABOLIC, AND INFLAMMATORY PARAMETERS IN BURN PATIENTS.

Authors:  Carly M Knuth; Sarah Rehou; Dalia Barayan; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Sepsis criteria versus clinical diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: A validation of current sepsis scores.

Authors:  Jinhui Yan; William F Hill; Sarah Rehou; Ruxandra Pinto; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Sepsis in the burn patient: a different problem than sepsis in the general population.

Authors:  David G Greenhalgh
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 10.  Neutrophil dysregulation during sepsis: an overview and update.

Authors:  Xiao-Fei Shen; Ke Cao; Jin-Peng Jiang; Wen-Xian Guan; Jun-Feng Du
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.