Literature DB >> 2313403

Racial bias in presentation of cases.

T E Finucane1, J A Carrese.   

Abstract

To investigate whether medical housestaff report race information differently during case presentations of black patients and white patients, a prospective observational study was performed. Without informing housestaff, a chief resident recorded data during consecutive case presentations over two months. For each presentation, the data included: 1) whether, where, and how often race was identified; 2) whether certain prospectively selected, "possibly unflattering characteristics" were mentioned; and 3) whether any "justifying" diagnoses were considered during presentation or subsequent discussion. Justifying diagnoses were those in which a patient's race was important in considering the likelihood of possible diagnoses. Twenty-three house officers presented 18 black and 35 white patients. A single East Indian patient was excluded from analysis. Race was specified more often during presentations of black than of white patients (16 of 18 for blacks vs. 19 of 36 for whites; p less than 0.01). For two black patients, a justifying diagnosis was considered, but excluding these patients did not change the results. Two other differences did not achieve statistical significance. Race was more often specified prominently and repeatedly during presentations of black patients. Among patients to whom "possibly unflattering" characteristics were attributed, race was more likely to be specified for blacks (10 of 10) than for whites (4 of 9). These case presentations appeared to show a subtle bias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach; Francis Scott Key Medical Center (Baltimore)

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2313403     DOI: 10.1007/bf02600511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  21 in total

1.  Validity of racial/ethnic classifications in medical records data: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Susan Moscou; Matthew R Anderson; Judith B Kaplan; Lisa Valencia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Racial bias in case presentation.

Authors:  C R Thomas; J E Coleman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Elimination of the patient's race from the case presentation.

Authors:  D E Lewis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  'These sorts of people don't do very well': race and allocation of health care resources.

Authors:  M Lowe; I H Kerridge; K R Mitchell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of cardiovascular procedures: associations with type of health insurance.

Authors:  D M Carlisle; B D Leake; M F Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Physician referral patterns and race differences in receipt of coronary angiography.

Authors:  Thomas A LaVeist; Athol Morgan; Melanie Arthur; Stephen Plantholt; Michael Rubinstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Do Words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the Transmission of Bias in the Medical Record.

Authors:  Anna P Goddu; Katie J O'Conor; Sophie Lanzkron; Mustapha O Saheed; Somnath Saha; Monica E Peek; Carlton Haywood; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  An investigation of associations between clinicians' ethnic or racial bias and hypertension treatment, medication adherence and blood pressure control.

Authors:  Irene V Blair; John F Steiner; Rebecca Hanratty; David W Price; Diane L Fairclough; Stacie L Daugherty; Michael Bronsert; David J Magid; Edward P Havranek
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority women.

Authors:  Christopher M Masi; Dionne J Blackman; Monica E Peek
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 10.  Diabetes health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Algernon Cargill; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.