OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to examine changes in stress among parents of children with special needs in a respite service and consider parental experience of the service. METHODS: Families who were enrolled in a ten-month centre-based respite program were invited to participate in the evaluation. Change in parent stress, indexed by the Parent Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF), was determined. These results were compared with findings from exploratory qualitative interviews with a subset of parents and a small comparison group who also completed the PSI-SF. RESULTS: At baseline, 69% of parents (n=45) had high total stress scores on the PSI-SF. No significant improvements were detected on parent stress over time or differences from improvements in the comparison group. In contrast, the subgroup of parents (n=10) who participated in the qualitative interviews described substantial benefits from the respite program including a sense of relief and having time for other activities. CONCLUSIONS: It is proposed that the respite program may have provided a temporary break to parents thereby bestowing a sense of relief, but was not adequate to impact on more chronic stress patterns, suggesting that these are related but separate constructs and experiences.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to examine changes in stress among parents of children with special needs in a respite service and consider parental experience of the service. METHODS: Families who were enrolled in a ten-month centre-based respite program were invited to participate in the evaluation. Change in parent stress, indexed by the Parent Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF), was determined. These results were compared with findings from exploratory qualitative interviews with a subset of parents and a small comparison group who also completed the PSI-SF. RESULTS: At baseline, 69% of parents (n=45) had high total stress scores on the PSI-SF. No significant improvements were detected on parent stress over time or differences from improvements in the comparison group. In contrast, the subgroup of parents (n=10) who participated in the qualitative interviews described substantial benefits from the respite program including a sense of relief and having time for other activities. CONCLUSIONS: It is proposed that the respite program may have provided a temporary break to parents thereby bestowing a sense of relief, but was not adequate to impact on more chronic stress patterns, suggesting that these are related but separate constructs and experiences.
Authors: M Loretta Secco; D Askin; C T Yu; Jennifer Garinger; Carole Mulaire-Cloutier; Lisa Scharf; Lisa Schwartzman; Debra Konyk; Maurice A Feldman Journal: Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs Date: 2006 Jul-Sep
Authors: Daniel M Bagner; Stephen J Sheinkopf; Cynthia Miller-Loncar; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Jing Liu; Charles R Bauer; Seetha Shankaran; Henrietta Bada; Abhik Das Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2008-07-15
Authors: Andrew M Garratt; Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Olaf Holmboe; Ketil Hanssen-Bauer Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2011-05-21 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Ling Xu; Noelle L Fields; Julienne A Greer; Priscila M Tamplain; John C Bricout; Bonita Sharma; Kristen L Doelling Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Dominik Laister; Giacomo Vivanti; Peter B Marschik; Johannes Fellinger; Daniel Holzinger Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 4.157