Literature DB >> 23132981

Evaluation of negative appendicectomy rate in cases of suspected acute appendicitis and to study the usefulness of ultrasonography in improving the diagnostic accuracy.

Rajeev Sharma1, Dev K Kasliwal, Raj G Sharma.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Acute appendicitis poses a significant diagnostic challenge to the surgeon. Despite modern advances, the diagnosis of appendicitis remains essentially clinical. Ultrasonography is effective in supplementing the clinical diagnosis. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the negative appendicectomy rate in patients subjected to appendicectomy and to assess the usefulness of ultrasound in improving the diagnostic accuracy. SETTINGS AND
DESIGN: It is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 118 patients operated for suspected acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit between May 2001 and December 2002. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The detailed history, clinical examination and preoperative investigations according to protocol were recorded on a proforma. All patients underwent an ultrasonography of whole abdomen including pelvis. Each patient with suspected acute appendicitis was subjected to surgery and appendix was submitted for histopathological examination. The negative rate of appendicectomy, sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography and positive and negative predictive value of ultrasound were calculated.
RESULTS: The negative appendicectomy rate was 23.72%. In males it was 13.43% and in females 37.25%. Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 63.33 % and a specificity of 82.14 %. The predictive value of a positive test was 91.93% and the predictive value of a negative test was 41.07%.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis when supplemented with an ultrasonography, can achieve a reasonable degree of diagnostic accuracy with resultant low negative exploration rates thereby reducing the financial burden and morbidity by avoiding unnecessary appendicectomy and keeping the cost of treatment affordable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicectomy; Negative Rate; Ultrasonography

Year:  2008        PMID: 23132981      PMCID: PMC3452587          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-007-0020-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  11 in total

1.  High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable.

Authors:  M Colson; K A Skinner; G Dunnington
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  High rates of appendicectomy in a developing country: an attempt to contribute to a more rational use of surgical resources.

Authors:  P Langenscheidt; C Lang; W Püschel; G Feifel
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-03

3.  US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andrea S Doria; Rahim Moineddin; Christian J Kellenberger; Monica Epelman; Joseph Beyene; Suzanne Schuh; Paul S Babyn; Paul T Dick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis?

Authors:  R E Andersson; A P Hugander; S H Ghazi; H Ravn; S K Offenbartl; P O Nyström; G P Olaison
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2000-10

5.  Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  H W Ooms; R K Koumans; P J Ho Kang You; J B Puylaert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group.

Authors:  C Franke; H Böhner; Q Yang; C Ohmann; H D Röher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings.

Authors:  R B Jeffrey; F C Laing; F R Lewis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  High-resolution real-time ultrasonography. A new tool in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  D H Adams; C Fine; D C Brooks
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases.

Authors:  R B Jeffrey; F C Laing; R R Townsend
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Sonography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis: value in establishing alternative diagnoses.

Authors:  E H Gaensler; R B Jeffrey; F C Laing; R R Townsend
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical mimics of acute appendicitis: Is there any role of imaging?

Authors:  Jyotindu Debnath; Vivek Sharma; R Ravikumar; Rajesh Kumar; Samar Chatterjee; Santhanan Sampath; Vijay Chandran; Vinay Maurya; Mukul Bhatia
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-03-29

2.  The value of preoperative diagnostic tests in acute appendicitis, retrospective analysis of 196 patients.

Authors:  Kemal Memisoglu; Bora Karip; Metin Mestan; Ender Onur
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Tin Nadarevic; Goran Poropat; Vesna Stefanac Nadarevic; Davor Stimac
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score in Comparison to Alvarado Score in Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Toney Jose; P S Rajesh
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2021-07-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.