Literature DB >> 23132817

Prospective analysis of atypical epithelial cells as a high-risk cytologic feature for malignancy in pancreatic cysts.

Martha B Pitman1, Kurt A Yaeger, William R Brugge, Mari Mino-Kenudson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cysts are aspirated to assess whether a cyst is mucinous on one hand and malignant on the other. The authors' retrospective data have indicated that high-grade atypical epithelial cells (AECs) identified on cytology are a high-risk feature and a better threshold than "positive" for detecting malignancy. The objective of the current study was to assess the accuracy of AECs in predicting malignancy in pancreatic cysts.
METHODS: Cysts aspirated by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNAs) obtained between January 2006 and June 2011 were evaluated. Cytologic, histologic, imaging, and cyst fluid analysis data were recorded. AECs were defined as cells that had an increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear hyperchromasia with or without membrane abnormalities and with or without cytoplasmic vacuoles, but of insufficient quality and quantity for a "positive" interpretation. Malignancy included mucinous cysts with high-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma. Performance characteristics of cytology with AECs or worse (high-grade atypia [HGA]) for predicting malignancy were assessed.
RESULTS: There were 70 FNAs that had histologic confirmation from 404 EUS-FNAs in 352 patients. Excluding 4 nondiagnostic FNAs, the study cohort consisted of 66 FNAs for analysis. There were 24 malignant cysts with 20 true-positive, 4 false-negative, 36 true-negative, and 6 false-positive results. For the detection of malignancy, HGA had 83% sensitivity, 86% specificity, a positive predictive value of 77%, a negative predictive value of 90%, and 85% overall accuracy. The lower threshold for malignancy with AECs resulted in a 12% increase in the detection of malignancy.
CONCLUSIONS: A finding of AECs on cytology is a high-risk feature for malignancy and is an accurate triage threshold for resection. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2013;121:29-36 © 2012 American Cancer Society.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23132817     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.

Authors:  Malcolm Kearns; Nuzhat A Ahmad
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts by combined cytopathology and cystic content analysis.

Authors:  Amanda K Martin; Zhongren Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10-25

4.  Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Strategic Considerations.

Authors:  Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Zhi Ven Fong; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-12-08

5.  European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.

Authors:  Martha B Pitman; Barbara A Centeno; Syed Z Ali; Muriel Genevay; Ed Stelow; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; C Max Schmidt; William R Brugge; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.091

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.