Literature DB >> 23132638

Anaesthetic preference and outcomes for elective inguinal hernia repair: a comparative analysis of public and private hospitals.

P Sanjay1, A Marioud, A Woodward.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is paucity of data regarding patient selection criteria, anaesthetic preferences and outcomes of elective inguinal hernia repair in public and private sector in the UK. This study aimed to compare such outcomes.
METHODS: Five hundred and fifty-five consecutive inguinal hernia repairs performed by one consultant surgeon in public and private sector were reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. The patient demographics, anaesthetic choice, day case rates and early and long-term morbidity were analysed.
RESULTS: The median age of the study group was 59 years (range 16-96 years) with a male/female ratio of 21:1. A total of 436 (78 %) patients underwent surgery in the public sector and 119 (22 %) patients in the private sector. The patients undergoing surgery in the private sector were younger compared to public sector (55 vs. 60 years, p = 0.03). The number of patients with ASA grades III and IV was higher in public sector (28.6 %) compared to private sector (p = 0.0001). General anaesthesia was the preferred anaesthetic technique in the private sector (52 %) and local anaesthesia in the public sector (66 %) (p = 0.0002). The day case rates were higher than in the private sector compared to public sector (78 vs. 66.5 %, p = 0.01). No significant difference was noted in the incidence of post-operative complications, recurrence, groin pain and satisfaction rate between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing surgery in the private sector are younger, healthier, prefer general anaesthesia and have higher day case rates compared to public sector. The short- and long-term outcomes are similar between public and private sectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23132638     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-1011-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  14 in total

1.  Local anaesthesia in elective inguinal hernia repair: a randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of levobupivacaine with racemic bupivacaine.

Authors:  Andrew N Kingsnorth; Chris G Cummings; David H Bennett
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

2.  Groin hernia surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  C M Cheek; N A Black; H B Devlin; A N Kingsnorth; R S Taylor; D F Watkin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Anaesthetic practice for groin hernia repair--a nation-wide study in Denmark 1998-2003.

Authors:  H Kehlet; M Bay Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Local anaesthesia as a risk factor for recurrence after groin hernia repair.

Authors:  H Kehlet; M Bay-Nielsen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Do race, gender, and source of payment impact on anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair?

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Melanie C Besculides; Cephas P Swamidoss
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.452

6.  Methods of repair and risk for reoperation in Swedish hernia surgery from 1992 to 1996.

Authors:  E Nilsson; S Haapaniemi; G Gruber; G Sandblom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Day-case inguinal hernia repair in the elderly: a surgical priority.

Authors:  M Kurzer; A Kark; S T Hussain
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Inguinal hernia repair: local or general anaesthesia?

Authors:  P Sanjay; A Woodward
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Outcomes of elective surgery undertaken in independent sector treatment centres and NHS providers in England: audit of patient outcomes in surgery.

Authors:  J Chard; M Kuczawski; N Black; J van der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-19
View more
  5 in total

1.  Day case parathyroidectomy: is this the right way for the patients?

Authors:  Rocco Rago; Francesco Forfori; Gianluca Frustaci; Roberta Monzani; Simone Paracchini; Francesca Franceschini; Filomena Cetani; Gabriele Materazzi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-01

2.  Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Geir Hiller Holom; Terje P Hagen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Local anesthesia underutilized for inguinal hernia repair in northern Ghana.

Authors:  Stephen Tabiri; Katie W Russell; Frank E Gyamfi; Ali Jalali; Raymond R Price; Micah G Katz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Which patients receive surgery in for-profit and non-profit hospitals in a universal health system? An explorative register-based study in Norway.

Authors:  Geir Hiller Holom; Nina Alexandersen; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Terje P Hagen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Comparing public and private providers: a scoping review of hospital services in Europe.

Authors:  Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen; Karsten Vrangbæk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.