Literature DB >> 23132394

Clinical equipoise regarding glycemic control: a survey of pediatric intensivist perceptions.

Eliotte L Hirshberg1, Katherine A Sward, Edward Vincent S Faustino, Vinay M Nadkarni, Michael S D Agus, Alan H Morris, Jacques Lacroix.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the willingness of pediatric intensivists to conduct a pediatric trial of blood glucose control, and to determine if self-reported practices were influenced by adult-specific data over the past 4 yrs. This was a follow-up to our previous 2005 survey.
DESIGN: Electronic survey comprising a 30-item questionnaire.
SETTING: North American PICUs that were members of, or connected to, the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Network (n = 96 targeted institutions). PARTICIPANTS: North American pediatric intensivists (n = 209).
INTERVENTIONS: None.
METHODS: We conducted a survey of North American PICUs using a Web-based questionnaire. Invitations were sent to 96 institutions in 37 states/provinces.
RESULTS: Response rate was 68% (141/209). The median definitions of hyperglycemia (150 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (≤60 mg/dL) were similar to our 2005 survey results. Self-reported practice patterns remain variable. Although 75% of clinician respondents denied a change in clinical practice based on the published literature, the preferred blood glucose target range increased from 80-110 mg/dL in 2005 to 90-140 mg/dL in 2009. Intensivists who preferred a blood glucose target of 80-110 mg/dL decreased from 43% to 6% (p < 0.001). Many respondents (45%) indicated that the acceptable severe hypoglycemia rate (% patients) for a protocol was ≤2.5%. The majority (93%) indicated they would be willing to enroll patients in a pediatric trial of blood glucose control.
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric intensivists report that they control blood glucose with insulin in critically ill children and do not necessarily adopt adult-specific data or a single uniform blood glucose target. The published evidence does not adequately address PICU clinicians concerns. Unanswered questions and persistent variation in practice suggest a need for a multicenter clinical trial of blood glucose control in critically ill children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23132394     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31826049b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  8 in total

1.  Retrospective outcomes of glucose control in critically ill children.

Authors:  Sarah B Kandil; Debra Spear; Neal J Thomas; Stuart A Weinzimer; Edward Vincent S Faustino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

2.  A Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Bedside Computer Clinical Decision Support Protocol for Hyperglycemia Is Feasible, Safe and Offers Advantages.

Authors:  Eliotte L Hirshberg; Michael J Lanspa; Emily L Wilson; Katherine A Sward; Al Jephson; Gitte Y Larsen; Alan H Morris
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  The principle of equipoise in pediatric drug trials.

Authors:  Kim Chau; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  Tight Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Children.

Authors:  Michael S D Agus; David Wypij; Eliotte L Hirshberg; Vijay Srinivasan; E Vincent Faustino; Peter M Luckett; Jamin L Alexander; Lisa A Asaro; Martha A Q Curley; Garry M Steil; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Design and rationale of Heart and Lung Failure - Pediatric INsulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT): A randomized clinical trial of tight glycemic control in hyperglycemic critically ill children.

Authors:  Michael Sd Agus; Ellie Hirshberg; Vijay Srinivasan; Edward Vincent Faustino; Peter M Luckett; Martha Aq Curley; Jamin Alexander; Lisa A Asaro; Kerry Coughlin-Wells; Donna Duva; Jaclyn French; Natalie Hasbani; Martha T Sisko; Carmen L Soto-Rivera; Garry Steil; David Wypij; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Contributions of a survey and retrospective cohort study to the planning of a randomised controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of paediatric septic shock.

Authors:  Anna Liu; Kusum Menon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in children with critical illness - do we need it?

Authors:  Ahmed El-Nawawy
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11

8.  Performance of an Electronic Decision Support System as a Therapeutic Intervention During a Multicenter PICU Clinical Trial: Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT).

Authors:  Eliotte L Hirshberg; Jamin L Alexander; Lisa A Asaro; Kerry Coughlin-Wells; Garry M Steil; Debbie Spear; Cheryl Stone; Vinay M Nadkarni; Michael S D Agus
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 9.410

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.