BACKGROUND: Rapid point-of-care (POC) syphilis tests based on simultaneous detection of treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies (dual POC tests) offer the opportunity to increase coverage of syphilis screening and treatment. This study aimed to conduct a multisite performance evaluation of a dual POC syphilis test in China. METHODS: Participants were recruited from patients at sexually transmitted infection clinics and high-risk groups in outreach settings in 6 sites in China. Three kinds of specimens (whole blood [WB], fingerprick blood [FB], and blood plasma [BP]) were used for evaluating sensitivity and specificity of the Dual Path Platform (DPP) Syphilis Screen and Confirm test using its treponemal and nontreponemal lines to compare Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay and toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST) as reference standards. RESULTS: A total of 3134 specimens (WB 1323, FB 488, and BP 1323) from 1323 individuals were collected. The sensitivities as compared with TPPA were 96.7% for WB, 96.4% for FB, and 94.6% for BP, and the specificities were 99.3%, 99.1%, and 99.6%, respectively. The sensitivities as compared with TRUST were 87.2% for WB, 85.8% for FB, and 88.4% for BP, and the specificities were 94.4%, 96.1%, and 95.0%, respectively. For specimens with a TRUST titer of 1:4 or higher, the sensitivities were 100.0% for WB, 97.8% for FB, and 99.6% for BP. CONCLUSIONS: DPP test shows good sensitivity and specificity in detecting treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies in 3 kinds of specimens. It is hoped that this assay can be considered as an alternative in the diagnosis of syphilis, particularly in resource-limited areas.
BACKGROUND: Rapid point-of-care (POC) syphilis tests based on simultaneous detection of treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies (dual POC tests) offer the opportunity to increase coverage of syphilis screening and treatment. This study aimed to conduct a multisite performance evaluation of a dual POC syphilis test in China. METHODS:Participants were recruited from patients at sexually transmitted infection clinics and high-risk groups in outreach settings in 6 sites in China. Three kinds of specimens (whole blood [WB], fingerprick blood [FB], and blood plasma [BP]) were used for evaluating sensitivity and specificity of the Dual Path Platform (DPP) Syphilis Screen and Confirm test using its treponemal and nontreponemal lines to compare Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay and toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST) as reference standards. RESULTS: A total of 3134 specimens (WB 1323, FB 488, and BP 1323) from 1323 individuals were collected. The sensitivities as compared with TPPA were 96.7% for WB, 96.4% for FB, and 94.6% for BP, and the specificities were 99.3%, 99.1%, and 99.6%, respectively. The sensitivities as compared with TRUST were 87.2% for WB, 85.8% for FB, and 88.4% for BP, and the specificities were 94.4%, 96.1%, and 95.0%, respectively. For specimens with a TRUST titer of 1:4 or higher, the sensitivities were 100.0% for WB, 97.8% for FB, and 99.6% for BP. CONCLUSIONS:DPP test shows good sensitivity and specificity in detecting treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies in 3 kinds of specimens. It is hoped that this assay can be considered as an alternative in the diagnosis of syphilis, particularly in resource-limited areas.
Authors: Arnold R Castro; Javan Esfandiari; Shailendra Kumar; Matthew Ashton; Susan E Kikkert; Mahin M Park; Ronald C Ballard Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Sarah Hawkes; Suellen Miller; Laura Reichenbach; Anjali Nayyar; Kent Buses Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: D E Pettit; S A Larsen; P S Harbec; J C Feeley; C E Parham; D D Cruce; E A Hambie; M W Perryman Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1983-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: David C Mabey; Kimberly A Sollis; Helen A Kelly; Adele S Benzaken; Edward Bitarakwate; John Changalucha; Xiang-Sheng Chen; Yue-Ping Yin; Patricia J Garcia; Susan Strasser; Namwinga Chintu; Tikki Pang; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Sedona Sweeney; Rosanna W Peeling Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Neela D Goswami; Jason E Stout; William C Miller; Emily J Hecker; Gary M Cox; Brianna L Norton; Arlene C Sena Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Cheng Wang; Weibin Cheng; Changchang Li; Weiming Tang; Jason J Ong; M Kumi Smith; Hongyun Fu; Michael Marks; Juan Nie; Heping Zheng; Joseph D Tucker; Bin Yang Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Rosanna W Peeling; David Mabey; Mary L Kamb; Xiang-Sheng Chen; Justin D Radolf; Adele S Benzaken Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 52.329