PURPOSE: To analyze whether local tumor control in advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) can be optimized by boosting the primary dose by endocavitary brachytherapy (EBT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: To study the role of EBT, three data sets on NPC, that is, the "Vienna", "Rotterdam," and "Amsterdam" series, with a total number of 411 advanced NPC patients, were available. The Rotterdam series consisted of 72 patients (34 T1,2N+ and 38 T3,4N0,+) and were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by external beam radiotherapy (dose 70/2Gy). After 70/2Gy, a boost was applied by EBT (in case of T1,2N+) or stereotactic radiation (in case of T3,4 tumors). The Amsterdam (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute) series consisted of 76 patients (40 T1,2N+ and 36 T3,4N0,+) and were irradiated to a dose of 70/2Gy with concomitant chemotherapy. No second boost by EBT was applied. RESULTS: In the case of T1,2N+ tumors, the local relapse rate (LRR) was significantly smaller if a boost was applied, that is, 0% (0/34, EBT boost) vs. 14% (14/102, no EBT boost) (p=0.023). For the T3,4 tumors, an LRR of 10% (4/38, EBT or stereotactic radiation boost) vs. 15% (17/111, no boost) was found (p=0.463). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of advanced NPC (T1,2N+ vs. T3,4N+,0), for early T-stages (T1,2N+), an EBT boost seems an excellent way to deliver highly conformal high doses of radiation to the nasopharynx, with high local control rates. For advanced T-stages (T3,4N+,0), the reduction in LRR (10% vs. 15%) was not significant (p=0.463).
PURPOSE: To analyze whether local tumor control in advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) can be optimized by boosting the primary dose by endocavitary brachytherapy (EBT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: To study the role of EBT, three data sets on NPC, that is, the "Vienna", "Rotterdam," and "Amsterdam" series, with a total number of 411 advanced NPCpatients, were available. The Rotterdam series consisted of 72 patients (34 T1,2N+ and 38 T3,4N0,+) and were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by external beam radiotherapy (dose 70/2Gy). After 70/2Gy, a boost was applied by EBT (in case of T1,2N+) or stereotactic radiation (in case of T3,4 tumors). The Amsterdam (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute) series consisted of 76 patients (40 T1,2N+ and 36 T3,4N0,+) and were irradiated to a dose of 70/2Gy with concomitant chemotherapy. No second boost by EBT was applied. RESULTS: In the case of T1,2N+ tumors, the local relapse rate (LRR) was significantly smaller if a boost was applied, that is, 0% (0/34, EBT boost) vs. 14% (14/102, no EBT boost) (p=0.023). For the T3,4 tumors, an LRR of 10% (4/38, EBT or stereotactic radiation boost) vs. 15% (17/111, no boost) was found (p=0.463). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of advanced NPC (T1,2N+ vs. T3,4N+,0), for early T-stages (T1,2N+), an EBT boost seems an excellent way to deliver highly conformal high doses of radiation to the nasopharynx, with high local control rates. For advanced T-stages (T3,4N+,0), the reduction in LRR (10% vs. 15%) was not significant (p=0.463).
Authors: Jose Luis Guinot; Andrea Moya; Miguel Angel Santos; Marina Peña; Beatriz Quiles; Juan Carlos Sanchez-Relucio; Alonso La Rosa; Maria Isabel Tortajada; Leoncio Arribas Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2020-05-06
Authors: Guohui Xu; Jinyi Lang; Yecai Huang; Mei Feng; Xuegang Yang; Jie Zhou; Lu Li; Ke Xu Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 3.989