Literature DB >> 23130883

Use of personalized ventilation for improving health, comfort, and performance at high room temperature and humidity.

A K Melikov1, M A Skwarczynski, J Kaczmarczyk, J Zabecky.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The effect of personalized ventilation (PV) on people's health, comfort, and performance in a warm and humid environment (26 and 28°C at 70% relative humidity) was studied and compared with their responses in a comfortable environment (23°C and 40% relative humidity). Thirty subjects participated in five 4-h experiments in a climate chamber. Under the conditions with PV, the subjects were able to control the rate and direction of the supplied personalized flow of clean air. Subjective responses were collected through questionnaires. During all exposures, the subjects were occupied with tasks used to assess their performance. Objective measures of tear film stability, concentration of stress biomarkers in saliva, and eye blinking rate were taken. Using PV significantly improved the perceived air quality (PAQ) and thermal sensation and decreased the intensity of Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) symptoms to those prevailing in a comfortable room environment without PV. Self-estimated and objectively measured performance was improved. Increasing the temperature and relative humidity, but not the use of PV, significantly decreased tear film quality and the concentration of salivary alpha-amylase, indicating lower mental arousal and alertness. The use of PV improved tear film stability as compared to that in a warm environment without PV. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: In practice, the supply of clean, cool, and less humid air by PV at each workstation will make it possible to raise room temperatures above the upper comfortable limit suggested in the present standards without adversely affecting the occupants' health [Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) symptoms], comfort (thermal and perceived air quality), and performance. This may lead to energy savings.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23130883     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of indoor heat stress variability in summer and during heat warnings: a case study using the UTCI in Berlin, Germany.

Authors:  Nadine Walikewitz; Britta Jänicke; Marcel Langner; Wilfried Endlicher
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 2.  Towards Personalization of Indoor Air Quality: Review of Sensing Requirements and Field Deployments.

Authors:  Qian Xu; Hui Ci Goh; Ehsan Mousavi; Hamed Nabizadeh Rafsanjani; Zubin Varghese; Yogesh Pandit; Ali Ghahramani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Effect of aerosol particles generated by ultrasonic humidifiers on the lung in mouse.

Authors:  Masakazu Umezawa; Keisuke Sekita; Ken-Ichiro Suzuki; Miyoko Kubo-Irie; Rikio Niki; Tomomi Ihara; Masao Sugamata; Ken Takeda
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 9.400

4.  Ten questions concerning the paradox of minimizing airborne transmission of infectious aerosols in densely occupied spaces via sustainable ventilation and other strategies in hot and humid climates.

Authors:  Nesreen Ghaddar; Kamel Ghali
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 7.093

5.  The effects of a novel personal comfort system on thermal comfort, physiology and perceived indoor environmental quality, and its health implications - Stimulating human thermoregulation without compromising thermal comfort.

Authors:  Wei Luo; Rick Kramer; Yvonne de Kort; Pascal Rense; Wouter van Marken Lichtenbelt
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.554

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.