Literature DB >> 23130814

Differences between axes depend on where you set the bar: associations among symptoms, interpersonal relationship and alexithymia with number of personality disorder criteria.

Giancarlo Dimaggio1, Antonino Carcione, Giuseppe Nicolò, Paul H Lysaker, Stefania d'Angerio, Maria Laura Conti, Donatella Fiore, Roberto Pedone, Michele Procacci, Raffaele Popolo, Antonio Semerari.   

Abstract

Personality disorders are better understood as entities that vary according to severity along specific domains rather than a phenomenon separate from and unrelated to Axis I disorders. This study explores whether patients who were rated as having greater numbers of personality disorder traits reported greater levels of interpersonal problems, psychiatric symptoms, and alexithymia. The sample was composed of 506 consecutive patients assessed in a private outpatient center who were administered the SCID-II Symptom-Checklist (SCL-90-R), Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-47), and Toronto Alexithymia-Scale (TAS-.20). Based upon the number of personality disorder traits identified in the SCID, participants were classified into five groups: 0-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, and 20 or more personality disorder traits met. Comparisons between groups revealed that symptom severity and levels of interpersonal problems increased between groups as the number of personality disorder traits increased. After covarying for symptom severity, there were no significant between-groups differences for levels of alexithymia. Findings are consistent with the claims that the simple Axis I-Axis II distinction is not an optimal strategy to understand personality pathology. It instead may be more fruitful to consider group differences in terms of numbers of personality disorder traits met.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23130814     DOI: 10.1521/pedi_2012_26_043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Disord        ISSN: 0885-579X


  6 in total

1.  Dysfunctional personality traits in adolescence: effects on alerting, orienting and executive control of attention.

Authors:  Maria Casagrande; Andrea Marotta; Valeria Canepone; Alfredo Spagna; Caterina Rosa; Giancarlo Dimaggio; Augusto Pasini
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-03-11

2.  Avoidant personality disorder versus social phobia: the significance of childhood neglect.

Authors:  Ingeborg Eikenaes; Jens Egeland; Benjamin Hummelen; Theresa Wilberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Personality Disorder and Changes in Affect Consciousness: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study of Patients with Avoidant and Borderline Personality Disorder.

Authors:  Eivind Normann-Eide; Merete Selsbakk Johansen; Tone Normann-Eide; Jens Egeland; Theresa Wilberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Single and Multiple Clinical Syndromes in Incarcerated Offenders: Associations With Dissociative Experiences and Emotionality.

Authors:  Carlo Garofalo; Patrizia Velotti; Cristina Crocamo; Giuseppe Carrà
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2017-01-09

5.  Early maladaptive schemas and their relation to personality disorders: A correlational examination in a clinical population.

Authors:  Hannah Kunst; Jill Lobbestael; Ingrid Candel; Tim Batink
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2020-06-17

6.  Clinical Associations Between Severity of Impulsivity, Psychiatric Morbidity, Dysfunctional Defences and Personality Disorder: A Comparative Study With Axis-I Disorders.

Authors:  Marco Chiesa; Anna Rita Atti; Manuela Licitra; Siegfried Alberti; Andrea Epifani; Rebecca Gilmozzi; Euro Pozzi
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2020-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.