Literature DB >> 23129674

The 'Global Outcomes Score': a quality measure, based on health outcomes, that compares current care to a target level of care.

David M Eddy1, Joshua Adler, Macdonald Morris.   

Abstract

The quality of health care is measured today using performance measures that calculate the percentage of people whose health conditions are managed according to specified processes or who meet specified treatment goals. This approach has several limitations. For instance, each measure looks at a particular process, risk factor, or biomarker one by one, and each uses sharp thresholds for defining "success" versus "failure." We describe a new measure of quality called the Global Outcomes Score (GO Score), which represents the proportion of adverse outcomes expected to be prevented in a population under current levels of care compared to a target level of care, such as 100 percent performance on certain clinical guidelines. We illustrate the use of the GO Score to measure blood pressure and cholesterol care in a longitudinal study of people at risk of atherosclerotic diseases, or hardening of the arteries. In that population the baseline GO Score was 40 percent, which indicates that the care being delivered was 40 percent as effective in preventing myocardial infarctions and strokes as our target level of care. The GO Score can be used to assess the potential effectiveness of different interventions such as prevention activities, tests, and treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129674     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  11 in total

1.  Measuring Population Health in a Large Integrated Health System to Guide Goal Setting and Resource Allocation: A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Stevens; Qinlian Zhou; Kimberly A Nucifora; Glen B Taksler; Marc N Gourevitch; Matthew C Stiefel; Patricia Kipnis; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  30-Day unplanned surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgically treated: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Xavier Plano; Manuel Ramírez; Antonia Matamalas; Sleiman Haddad; Ana García de Frutos; J M Casamitjana; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of IndiGO individualized clinical guidelines in primary care.

Authors:  Jim Bellows; Samir Patel; Scott S Young
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Health-weighted Composite Quality Metrics Offer Promise to Improve Health Outcomes in a Learning Health System.

Authors:  Scott Braithwaite; Nicholas Stine
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2013-10-28

5.  Measuring Preventable Outcomes: Global Cardiovascular Risk (GCVR).

Authors:  Benjamin N Hamlin
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-04-20

6.  Concordium 2016: Data and Knowledge Transforming Health.

Authors:  Beth Devine
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-04-20

7.  Reducing Health Care Costs Through Patient Targeting: Risk Adjustment Modeling to Predict Patients Remaining High Cost.

Authors:  Jonathan Wrathall; Tom Belnap
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-04-20

8.  Correlation between hospital finances and quality and safety of patient care.

Authors:  Dean D Akinleye; Louise-Anne McNutt; Victoria Lazariu; Colleen C McLaughlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Who is watching the watchmen: Is quality reporting ever harmful?

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Arthur Caplan
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-02-18

10.  Care that Matters: Quality Measurement and Health Care.

Authors:  Barry G Saver; Stephen A Martin; Ronald N Adler; Lucy M Candib; Konstantinos E Deligiannidis; Jeremy Golding; Daniel J Mullin; Michele Roberts; Stefan Topolski
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.