Literature DB >> 2312958

Relation of quantitative coronary lesion measurements to the development of exercise-induced ischemia assessed by exercise echocardiography.

K H Sheikh1, J R Bengtson, S Helmy, C Juarez, R Burgess, T M Bashore, J Kisslo.   

Abstract

To assess the relation of quantitative measures of coronary stenoses to the development of exercise-induced regional wall motion abnormalities, 34 patients with isolated, single vessel coronary artery lesions and normal wall motion at rest underwent exercise echocardiography and quantitative angiography on the same day. Although all 11 patients with a visually estimated stenosis greater than or equal to 75% had an ischemic response and 10 (91%) of 11 patients with a less than or equal to 25% visually estimated stenosis had a normal response by exercise echocardiography, among 12 patients with a visually estimated stenosis of 50%, 6 (50%) had an ischemic response and 6 (50%) had a normal exercise echocardiogram. Quantitative measurements of stenosis severity distinguished patients with ischemic (group 1) from normal (group 2) exercise echocardiographic responses as follows: minimal luminal diameter (mm), group 1 1.0 +/- 0.4 versus group 2 1.7 +/- 0.4, p less than 0.0001; minimal cross-sectional area (mm2), group 1 0.9 +/- 0.6 versus group 2 2.5 +/- 1.1, p less than 0.0001; percent diameter stenosis, group 1 68.3 +/- 14.2 versus group 2 42.2 +/- 12.1, p less than 0.0001; and percent area stenosis, group 1 87.5 +/- 7.8 versus group 2 64.8 +/- 15.9, p less than 0.0001. These data validate the utility of exercise echocardiography by demonstrating that 1) coronary stenosis severity measured by quantitative angiography is closely related to wall motion abnormalities detected by exercise echocardiography, and 2) exercise echocardiography can be used as a noninvasive means to assess the physiologic significance of coronary artery lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2312958     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90238-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  7 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial perfusion imaging versus two-dimensional echocardiography: comparative value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Stress echocardiography: time for critical reappraisal.

Authors:  P K Mazeika; P Nihoyannopoulos; C M Oakley
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

3.  Exercise echocardiography and single photon emission computed tomography in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  A Salustri; M M Pozzoli; B Ilmer; W Hermans; A E Reijs; J H Reiber; J R Roelandt; P M Fioretti
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

4.  Relationship between myocardial perfusion and dysfunction in diabetic cardiomyopathy: a study of quantitative contrast echocardiography and strain rate imaging.

Authors:  S Moir; L Hanekom; Z-Y Fang; B Haluska; C Wong; M Burgess; T H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Detection of patients with restenosis after PTCA by dipyridamole-atropine-stress-echocardiography.

Authors:  A W Scherhag; S Pfleger; A B Schreckenberger; J Grüttner; W Voelker; U Staedt; D L Heene
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-04

6.  Left and right heart Doppler stress echo in congestive heart failure.

Authors:  T Bartel; S Müller; A C Borges; G Baumann
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-12

7.  The diagnostic value of exercise echocardiography in ischemic heart disease in relation to quantitative coronary arteriography.

Authors:  D Atar; S Ali; F Steensgaard-Hansen; K Saunamäki; P S Ramanujam; H Egeblad; S Haunsø
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.