Literature DB >> 23129476

Reply to letter-to-the-editor: efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs.

Vance W Berger.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23129476      PMCID： PMC3528924          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-012-2688-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Reply to letter to the editor: efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs.

Authors:  Nathan L Grimm; Kevin G Shea; Ryan W Leaver; Stephen K Aoki; James L Carey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Letter to the editor: efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials.

Authors:  V W Berger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs.

Authors:  Nathan L Grimm; Kevin G Shea; Ryan W Leaver; Stephen K Aoki; James L Carey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Prevention of overuse injuries by a concurrent exercise program in subjects exposed to an increase in training load: a randomized controlled trial of 1020 army recruits.

Authors:  Christoffer Brushøj; Klaus Larsen; Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Finn Løye; Per Hölmich
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.202
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.