BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Blue light has been employed or investigated in both the medical and dental fields. Many studies have so far been reported a bactericidal effect of blue light emitting diodes (LED). However, it is still unclear whether exposure to blue LED kills or inhibits the growth of bacteria. We therefore investigated the effect of blue LED irradiation on the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis compared with the effects of red LED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: P. gingivalis cell suspensions were irradiated with blue or red LED (135 J/cm2) anaerobically, incubated for various lengths of time, and then the total RNAs were isolated. The RNA degradation and gene expression levels of stress-related proteins in blue or red LED-irradiated samples were examined using the RNA integrity number (RIN) and RT-PCR, respectively. Quantitative RT-PCR was done to investigate the gene expression profiles associated with chromosome replication and cell division. RESULTS: Exposure to blue LED delayed the growth of P. gingivalis, while red LED did not. The RIN value indicated no RNA degradation in either the blue or red LED-irradiated samples. In addition, the gene expression levels of stress-related molecules remained either constant or increased 15 minutes after the blue LED irradiation compared to that before irradiation, thus suggesting that blue LED may not kill P. gingivalis cells. However, the blue LED irradiation did lead to a remarkably decreased expression of genes associated with chromosomal DNA replication and cell division after 5 minutes; exposure to the red LED did not. CONCLUSION: The inhibition of the growth of P. gingivalis by blue LED may therefore be induced not by a bactericidal effect, but instead due to a bacteriostatic effect mediated by the suppression of the genes associated with chromosomal DNA replication and cell division at the transcriptional level.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Blue light has been employed or investigated in both the medical and dental fields. Many studies have so far been reported a bactericidal effect of blue light emitting diodes (LED). However, it is still unclear whether exposure to blue LED kills or inhibits the growth of bacteria. We therefore investigated the effect of blue LED irradiation on the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis compared with the effects of red LED. MATERIALS AND METHODS:P. gingivalis cell suspensions were irradiated with blue or red LED (135 J/cm2) anaerobically, incubated for various lengths of time, and then the total RNAs were isolated. The RNA degradation and gene expression levels of stress-related proteins in blue or red LED-irradiated samples were examined using the RNA integrity number (RIN) and RT-PCR, respectively. Quantitative RT-PCR was done to investigate the gene expression profiles associated with chromosome replication and cell division. RESULTS: Exposure to blue LED delayed the growth of P. gingivalis, while red LED did not. The RIN value indicated no RNA degradation in either the blue or red LED-irradiated samples. In addition, the gene expression levels of stress-related molecules remained either constant or increased 15 minutes after the blue LED irradiation compared to that before irradiation, thus suggesting that blue LED may not kill P. gingivalis cells. However, the blue LED irradiation did lead to a remarkably decreased expression of genes associated with chromosomal DNA replication and cell division after 5 minutes; exposure to the red LED did not. CONCLUSION: The inhibition of the growth of P. gingivalis by blue LED may therefore be induced not by a bactericidal effect, but instead due to a bacteriostatic effect mediated by the suppression of the genes associated with chromosomal DNA replication and cell division at the transcriptional level.
Authors: Yucheng Wang; Ying Wang; Yuguang Wang; Clinton K Murray; Michael R Hamblin; David C Hooper; Tianhong Dai Journal: Drug Resist Updat Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 18.500
Authors: Adenilson de Souza da Fonseca; Larissa Alexsandra da Silva Neto Trajano; Eduardo Tavares Lima Trajano; Flavia de Paoli; Andre Luiz Mencalha Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2021-01-02 Impact factor: 3.161