BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence for effective obesity treatment programs that engage men. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the efficacy of two gender-tailored weight loss interventions for men, which required no face-to-face contact. METHODS: This was a three-arm, randomized controlled trial: (1) Resources (n = 54), gender-tailored weight loss materials (DVD, handbooks, pedometer, tape measure); (2) Online (n = 53), Resources materials plus study website and e-feedback; and (3) Wait-list control (n = 52). The interventions lasted 3 months and were grounded in Social Cognitive Theory. RESULTS: At 6 months, significantly greater weight loss was observed for the Online (-4.7 kg; 95 % CI -6.1, -3.2) and Resources (-3.7 kg; 95 % CI -4.9, -2.5) groups compared to the control (-0.5 kg; 95 % CI -1.4, 0.4). Additionally, both intervention groups significantly improved body mass index, percent body fat, waist circumference, blood pressure, physical activity, quality of life, alcohol risk, and portion size, compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Men achieved significant weight loss after receiving novel, minimal-contact, gender-tailored programs, which were designed for widespread dissemination.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence for effective obesity treatment programs that engage men. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the efficacy of two gender-tailored weight loss interventions for men, which required no face-to-face contact. METHODS: This was a three-arm, randomized controlled trial: (1) Resources (n = 54), gender-tailored weight loss materials (DVD, handbooks, pedometer, tape measure); (2) Online (n = 53), Resources materials plus study website and e-feedback; and (3) Wait-list control (n = 52). The interventions lasted 3 months and were grounded in Social Cognitive Theory. RESULTS: At 6 months, significantly greater weight loss was observed for the Online (-4.7 kg; 95 % CI -6.1, -3.2) and Resources (-3.7 kg; 95 % CI -4.9, -2.5) groups compared to the control (-0.5 kg; 95 % CI -1.4, 0.4). Additionally, both intervention groups significantly improved body mass index, percent body fat, waist circumference, blood pressure, physical activity, quality of life, alcohol risk, and portion size, compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS:Men achieved significant weight loss after receiving novel, minimal-contact, gender-tailored programs, which were designed for widespread dissemination.
Authors: David M Levine; Stella Savarimuthu; Allison Squires; Joseph Nicholson; Melanie Jay Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Margaret Raber; Yue Liao; Anne Rara; Susan M Schembre; Kate J Krause; Larkin Strong; Carrie Daniel-MacDougall; Karen Basen-Engquist Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Rebecca A Jones; Emma R Lawlor; Jack M Birch; Manal I Patel; André O Werneck; Erin Hoare; Simon J Griffin; Esther M F van Sluijs; Stephen J Sharp; Amy L Ahern Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2020-10-25 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Jill M Hamilton-Reeves; Chelsea N Johnson; Lauren K Hand; Misty D Bechtel; Hilary L Robertson; Carrie Michel; Meredith Metcalf; Prabhakar Chalise; Nicholas J Mahan; Moben Mirza; Eugene K Lee; Debra K Sullivan; Jennifer R Klemp; Christie A Befort; William P Parker; Heather D Gibbs; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; J Brantley Thrasher Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Cindy M Gray; Kate Hunt; Nanette Mutrie; Annie S Anderson; Jim Leishman; Lindsay Dalgarno; Sally Wyke Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 3.295