Literature DB >> 23129019

Toxicity of engineered nanomaterials: a physicochemical perspective.

Ramakrishna Podila1, Jared M Brown.   

Abstract

The global market for nanomaterial-based products is forecasted to reach 100 billion dollars per annum for 2011-2015. Extensive manufacturing and the use of engineered nanomaterials have raised concerns regarding their impact on biological response in living organisms and the environment at large. The fundamental properties of nanomaterials exhibit a complex dependence upon several factors such as their morphology, size, defects, and chemical stability. Therefore, it is exceedingly difficult to correlate their biological response with their intricate physicochemical properties. For example, varying toxic response may ensue due to different methods of nanomaterial preparation, dissimilar impurities, and defects. In this review, we surveyed the existing literature on the dependence of cytotoxicity on physicochemical properties. We found that ENM size, shape, defect density, physicochemical stability, and surface modification to be the main causes that elicit altered physiological response or cytotoxicity.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129019      PMCID: PMC3778677          DOI: 10.1002/jbt.21442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol        ISSN: 1095-6670            Impact factor:   3.642


  53 in total

Review 1.  Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions.

Authors:  Adamo R Petosa; Deb P Jaisi; Ivan R Quevedo; Menachem Elimelech; Nathalie Tufenkji
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells.

Authors:  B Devika Chithrani; Arezou A Ghazani; Warren C W Chan
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 3.  Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management.

Authors:  Grazyna Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska; Jerzy Golimowski; Pawel L Urban
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 4.  Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects.

Authors:  Stephen J Klaine; Pedro J J Alvarez; Graeme E Batley; Teresa F Fernandes; Richard D Handy; Delina Y Lyon; Shaily Mahendra; Michael J McLaughlin; Jamie R Lead
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 5.  An ecological perspective on nanomaterial impacts in the environment.

Authors:  Emily S Bernhardt; Benjamin P Colman; Michael F Hochella; Bradley J Cardinale; Roger M Nisbet; Curtis J Richardson; Liyan Yin
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.751

Review 6.  Nanomaterials in the environment: from materials to high-throughput screening to organisms.

Authors:  Courtney R Thomas; Saji George; Allison M Horst; Zhaoxia Ji; Robert J Miller; Jose R Peralta-Videa; Tian Xia; Suman Pokhrel; Lutz Mädler; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Patricia A Holden; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan; Andre E Nel; Jeffrey I Zink
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Functionalized carbon nanotubes are non-cytotoxic and preserve the functionality of primary immune cells.

Authors:  Hélène Dumortier; Stéphanie Lacotte; Giorgia Pastorin; Riccardo Marega; Wei Wu; Davide Bonifazi; Jean-Paul Briand; Maurizio Prato; Sylviane Muller; Alberto Bianco
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 8.  The devil is in the details (or the surface): impact of surface structure and surface energetics on understanding the behavior of nanomaterials in the environment.

Authors:  Imali A Mudunkotuwa; Vicki H Grassian
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2011-04-26

9.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study.

Authors:  Craig A Poland; Rodger Duffin; Ian Kinloch; Andrew Maynard; William A H Wallace; Anthony Seaton; Vicki Stone; Simon Brown; William Macnee; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 10.  A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors.

Authors:  Ron Hardman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  27 in total

1.  Defect-induced electronic states amplify the cellular toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Indushekhar Persaud; Achyut J Raghavendra; Archini Paruthi; Nasser B Alsaleh; Valerie C Minarchick; James R Roede; Ramakrishna Podila; Jared M Brown
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.913

2.  Influence of carbon nanomaterial defects on the formation of protein corona.

Authors:  Bishwambhar Sengupta; Wren E Gregory; Jingyi Zhu; Siva Dasetty; Mehmet Karakaya; Jared M Brown; Apparao M Rao; John K Barrows; Sapna Sarupria; Ramakrishna Podila
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  Influence of physicochemical properties of silver nanoparticles on mast cell activation and degranulation.

Authors:  Abdullah A Aldossari; Jonathan H Shannahan; Ramakrishna Podila; Jared M Brown
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: an in vitro study of DNA binding, chromosome aberration assay, and comet assay.

Authors:  Suhani Patel; Palak Patel; Sonal R Bakshi
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Toxicological Aspects of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Natalia Fernández-Bertólez; Carla Costa; Fátima Brandão; João Paulo Teixeira; Eduardo Pásaro; Vanessa Valdiglesias; Blanca Laffon
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  Graphene-based platforms for cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Sunny C Patel; Stephen Lee; Gaurav Lalwani; Cassandra Suhrland; Sayan Mullick Chowdhury; Balaji Sitharaman
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2016-01-15

7.  Pulmonary Exposure to Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Leads to Neurotoxicity via Oxidative Damage and Mitochondrial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Hongmei Zhou; Ling Yao; Xuejun Jiang; Golamaully Sumayyah; Baijie Tu; Shuqun Cheng; Xia Qin; Jun Zhang; Zhen Zou; Chengzhi Chen
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 8.  Biocompatibility of nanomaterials and their immunological properties.

Authors:  Themis R Kyriakides; Arindam Raj; Tiffany H Tseng; Hugh Xiao; Ryan Nguyen; Farrah S Mohammed; Saiti Halder; Mengqing Xu; Michelle J Wu; Shuozhen Bao; Wendy C Sheu
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.715

9.  Application of Multi-Species Microbial Bioassay to Assess the Effects of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Aquatic Environment: Potential of a Luminous Microbial Array for Toxicity Risk Assessment (LumiMARA) on Testing for Surface-Coated Silver Nanoparticles.

Authors:  YounJung Jung; Chang-Beom Park; Youngjun Kim; Sanghun Kim; Stephan Pflugmacher; Seungyun Baik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The role of biological fluid and dynamic flow in the behavior and cellular interactions of gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Emily K Breitner; Saber M Hussain; Kristen K Comfort
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.