BACKGROUND: Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) is associated with risk indicators, including Gleason score, preoperative PSA level, tumor stage, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive surgical margins. The 5-year biochemical progression rate among predisposed patients is as high as 50-70%. Post-RP treatment options include adjuvant radiotherapy (ART, for men with undetectable PSA) or salvage radiotherapy (SRT, for PSA persisting or re-rising above detection threshold). Presently, there are no published randomized trials evaluating ART vs. SRT directly. METHODS: Published data on ART and SRT were reviewed to allow a comparison of the two treatment approaches. RESULTS: Three randomized phase III trials demonstrated an almost 20% absolute benefit for biochemical progression-free survival after ART (60-64 Gy) compared to a "wait and see" policy. The greatest benefit was achieved in patients with positive margins and pT3 tumors. SRT can be offered to patients with elevated PSA after RP. In 30-70% of SRT patients, PSA will decrease to an undetectable level, thus giving a second curative chance. The rate of side effects for both treatments is comparably low. The role of irradiation of pelvic lymph nodes and the additional use of hormone therapy and radiation dose are discussed. CONCLUSION: It remains unclear whether early SRT initiated after PSA failure is equivalent to ART. Where SRT is indicated, it should be started as early as possible.
BACKGROUND: Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) is associated with risk indicators, including Gleason score, preoperative PSA level, tumor stage, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive surgical margins. The 5-year biochemical progression rate among predisposed patients is as high as 50-70%. Post-RP treatment options include adjuvant radiotherapy (ART, for men with undetectable PSA) or salvage radiotherapy (SRT, for PSA persisting or re-rising above detection threshold). Presently, there are no published randomized trials evaluating ART vs. SRT directly. METHODS: Published data on ART and SRT were reviewed to allow a comparison of the two treatment approaches. RESULTS: Three randomized phase III trials demonstrated an almost 20% absolute benefit for biochemical progression-free survival after ART (60-64 Gy) compared to a "wait and see" policy. The greatest benefit was achieved in patients with positive margins and pT3 tumors. SRT can be offered to patients with elevated PSA after RP. In 30-70% of SRT patients, PSA will decrease to an undetectable level, thus giving a second curative chance. The rate of side effects for both treatments is comparably low. The role of irradiation of pelvic lymph nodes and the additional use of hormone therapy and radiation dose are discussed. CONCLUSION: It remains unclear whether early SRT initiated after PSA failure is equivalent to ART. Where SRT is indicated, it should be started as early as possible.
Authors: Colin B Begg; Elyn R Riedel; Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren; Peter T Scardino Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tom Budiharto; Christiaan Perneel; Karin Haustermans; Sara Junius; Bertrand Tombal; Pierre Scalliet; Laurette Renard; Evelyne Lerut; Kris Vekemans; Steven Joniau; Hendrik Van Poppel Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ludwig Rinnab; Felix M Mottaghy; Norbert M Blumstein; Sven N Reske; Richard E Hautmann; Kathrin Hohl; Peter Möller; Thomas Wiegel; Rainer Kuefer; Juergen E Gschwend Journal: BJU Int Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Richard Choo; Cyril Danjoux; Sandra Gardner; Gerard Morton; Ewa Szumacher; D Andrew Loblaw; Patrick Cheung; Maria Pearse Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Johnny Ray Bernard; Steven J Buskirk; Michael G Heckman; Nancy N Diehl; Stephen J Ko; Orlan K Macdonald; Steven E Schild; Thomas M Pisansky Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: R Cambria; F Cattani; B A Jereczek-Fossa; F Pansini; D Ciardo; S Vigorito; S Russo; D Zerini; L Cozzi; R Orecchia Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Gunnar Lohm; Jörg Lütcke; Basil Jamil; Stefan Höcht; Konrad Neumann; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Thomas Wiegel; Dirk Bottke Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: J F Langenhuijsen; R Donker; G M McColl; L A L M Kiemeney; J A Witjes; E N J T van Lin Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-04-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Cordula A Jilg; Anja Leifert; Daniel Schnell; Simon Kirste; Natalia Volegova-Neher; Daniel Schlager; Gesche Wieser; Karl Henne; Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann; Anca-L Grosu; Hans Christian Rischke Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 3.481