| Literature DB >> 23128467 |
Gabriella Brum1, Thomas Carbone, Eric Still, Vendita Correia, Kevin Szulak, David Calianese, Charles Best, Garret Cammarata, Katelyn Higgins, Fang Ji, Wen Di, Yinsheng Wan.
Abstract
Doxorubicin has been used clinically to treat various types of cancer, and yet the molecular mode of actions of doxorubicin remains to be fully unraveled. In this study, we investigated the effect of doxorubicin on cultured ovarian cancer cells (CaOV3). MTT assay data showed that doxorubicin inhibits cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Phagokinetic cell motility assay data indicated that doxorubicin inhibits both basal level and EGF-induced cell migration in CaOV3 cells. Confocal microscopic data revealed that doxorubicin induces reorganization of cytoskeletal proteins including actin, tubulin and vimentin. Doxorubicin induces phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 and 20, acetylation of p53 and ATM activation. Doxorubicin also induces phosphorylation of histone H2AX at Ser139. Interestingly, doxorubicin also inhibits mTOR activity, measured by phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein. Pretreatment of CaOV3 cells with antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC), but not pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) potentiates doxorubicin-induced phosphorylation of p53 and ATM. Collectively, we conclude that doxorubicin induces ATM/p53 activation leading to reorganization of cytoskeletal networks, inhibition of mTOR activity, and inhibition of cell proliferation and migration. Our data also suggest that removal of oxidants by antioxidants such as NAC may enhance the efficacy of doxorubicin in vivo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23128467 PMCID: PMC3583638 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Oncol ISSN: 1019-6439 Impact factor: 5.650
Figure 1.Effect of doxorubicin on cell viability in cultured ovarian cancer cells. CaOV3 cells were cultured in 96-well plates and treated with various concentrations of doxorubicin. (A) Cells were observed 24 h after treatment under an inverted microscope and (B) cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Cells were treated with doxorubicin at the concentration of 10 μM and (C) observed at different time points and (D) cell viability was assayed by MTT.
Figure 2.Effect of doxorubicin on ovarian cancer cell migration. CaOV3 cells were cultured and treated with or without doxorubicin or EGF and cell migration was monitored 24 h after treatment by phagokinetic mobility track assay.
Figure 3.Effect of doxorubicin on cytoskeletal proteins in cultured ovarian cancer cells. CaOV3 cells were cultured in 8-well chamber slides, treated with 10 μM of doxurubicin and fixed at different time points. Tubulin, vimentin and actin filaments were stained with antibodies and visualized under a confocal microscope.
Figure 4.Effect of NAC on doxorubicin-induced activation of ATM, p53 and H2AX in cultured ovarian cancer cells. CaOV3 cells were cultured in 8-well chamber slides, pretreated with NAC, PDTC, or Wortmannin, for 2 h and then treated with doxorubicin. Cells were fixed 2 h post-doxorubicin treatment. Antibodies were used to detect (A) phospho-ATM, (B) phospho-p53, (C) acetylated p53 and (D) phospho-H2AX. Confocal microscopy was performed.