Literature DB >> 23127662

Metabolomic analysis of two different models of delayed preconditioning.

Claudio Bravo1, Raymond K Kudej, Chujun Yuan, Seonghun Yoon, Hui Ge, Ji Yeon Park, Bin Tian, William C Stanley, Stephen F Vatner, Dorothy E Vatner, Lin Yan.   

Abstract

Recently we described an ischemic preconditioning induced by repetitive coronary stenosis, which is induced by 6 episodes of non-lethal ischemia over 3 days, and which also resembles the hibernating myocardium phenotype. When compared with traditional second window of ischemic preconditioning using cDNA microarrays, many genes which differed in the repetitive coronary stenosis appeared targeted to metabolism. Accordingly, the goal of this study was to provide a more in depth analysis of changes in metabolism in the different models of delayed preconditioning, i.e., second window and repetitive coronary stenosis. This was accomplished using a metabolomic approach based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques. Myocardial samples from the ischemic section of porcine hearts subjected to both models of late preconditioning were compared against sham controls. Interestingly, although both models involve delayed preconditioning, their metabolic signatures were radically different; of the total number of metabolites that changed in both models (135 metabolites) only 7 changed in both models, and significantly more, p<0.01, were altered in the repetitive coronary stenosis (40%) than in the second window (8.1%). The most significant changes observed were in energy metabolism, e.g., phosphocreatine was increased 4 fold and creatine kinase activity increased by 27.2%, a pattern opposite from heart failure, suggesting that the repetitive coronary stenosis and potentially hibernating myocardium have enhanced stress resistance capabilities. The improved energy metabolism could also be a key mechanism contributing to the cardioprotection observed in the repetitive coronary stenosis and in hibernating myocardium. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Focus on Cardiac Metabolism".
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23127662      PMCID: PMC3980464          DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol        ISSN: 0022-2828            Impact factor:   5.000


  38 in total

1.  Evidence that late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits is triggered by the generation of nitric oxide.

Authors:  R Bolli; Z A Bhatti; X L Tang; Y Qiu; Q Zhang; Y Guo; A K Jadoon
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  W Wijns; S F Vatner; P G Camici
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic reversible left ventricular dysfunction due to coronary artery disease (hibernating myocardium).

Authors:  P G Camici; W Wijns; M Borgers; R De Silva; R Ferrari; J Knuuti; A A Lammertsma; A J Liedtke; G Paternostro; S F Vatner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Hibernating myocardium: adaptation or degeneration?

Authors:  A Elsässer; J Schaper
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 17.165

5.  Inotropic reserve and histological appearance of hibernating myocardium in conscious pigs with ameroid-induced coronary stenosis.

Authors:  Y T Shen; R K Kudej; S P Bishop; S F Vatner
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 17.165

6.  Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium.

Authors:  C E Murry; R B Jennings; K A Reimer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Delayed effects of sublethal ischemia on the acquisition of tolerance to ischemia.

Authors:  T Kuzuya; S Hoshida; N Yamashita; H Fuji; H Oe; M Hori; T Kamada; M Tada
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Intermittent brief periods of ischemia have a cumulative effect and may cause myocardial necrosis.

Authors:  I L Geft; M C Fishbein; K Ninomiya; J Hashida; E Chaux; J Yano; J Y-Rit; T Genov; W Shell; W Ganz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Cardiac stress protein elevation 24 hours after brief ischemia or heat stress is associated with resistance to myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M S Marber; D S Latchman; J M Walker; D M Yellon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Mechanism of impaired myocardial function during progressive coronary stenosis in conscious pigs. Hibernation versus stunning?

Authors:  Y T Shen; S F Vatner
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and cellular basis of viable dysfunctional myocardium.

Authors:  Marina Bayeva; Konrad Teodor Sawicki; Javed Butler; Mihai Gheorghiade; Hossein Ardehali
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Effects of Near-Infrared Light on Cerebral Bioenergetics Measured with Phosphorus Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Dionyssios Mintzopoulos; Timothy E Gillis; Clark E Tedford; Marc J Kaufman
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 3.  Post-Genomic Methodologies and Preclinical Animal Models: Chances for the Translation of Cardioprotection to the Clinic.

Authors:  Lina Badimon; Guiomar Mendieta; Soumaya Ben-Aicha; Gemma Vilahur
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Christopher Uhlig; Jakob Labus
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.