Literature DB >> 23127625

Mechanical characterization of human aortas from pressurization testing and a paradigm shift for circumferential residual stress.

Michel R Labrosse1, Eleanor R Gerson, John P Veinot, Carsten J Beller.   

Abstract

Material properties needed for accurate stress analysis of the human aorta are still incompletely known, especially as many reports have ignored the presence of residual stresses in the aortic wall. To contribute new material regarding these issues, we carried out measurements and pressurization testing on ascending, thoracic and abdominal aortic samples from 24 human subjects aged 38-77 years, and evaluated the opening angle describing the circumferential residual stress level present in the aorta. We determined material constants for the aorta by gender, anatomic location and age group, according to a simple phenomenological constitutive model. The unpressurized aortic radius positively correlated with age, and the circumferential and longitudinal stretch ratios under systemic pressure negatively correlated with age, confirming the known enlargement and stiffening of the aorta with aging. The opening angle was measured to range from a minimum of 89° to above 360° for extreme cases. For given aortic dimensions and material properties, analysis of the in vivo circumferential and longitudinal mural stress distributions indicated a profound influence of the opening angle. For instance, in the thoracic aorta of males aged 38-66, opening angles in the range of 0° to 80° (resp. 60°) may equalize the gradient of in vivo circumferential (resp. longitudinal) stress between the inner and outer layers of the aorta, as commonly expected; however, opening angles above 160° (resp. 120°) may cause the gradient of circumferential (resp. longitudinal) stress to reverse and increase compared to the case without residual stress, putting the maximum stresses toward the adventitia instead of the intima. Even though the analysis of the aortic wall excluded possible longitudinal residual stresses as well as material inhomogeneities, such as constitutive differences between the intimal, medial and adventitial layers, the experimental data reported herein are important to aortic modeling at large and the better understanding of aortic pathophysiology in particular.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23127625     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  8 in total

1.  Decreased elastic energy storage, not increased material stiffness, characterizes central artery dysfunction in fibulin-5 deficiency independent of sex.

Authors:  J Ferruzzi; M R Bersi; S Uman; H Yanagisawa; J D Humphrey
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Multi-sector approximation method for arteries: the residual stresses of circumferential rings with non-trivial openings.

Authors:  Taisiya Sigaeva; Michel Destrade; Elena S Di Martino
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Anisotropic residual stresses in arteries.

Authors:  Taisiya Sigaeva; Gerhard Sommer; Gerhard A Holzapfel; Elena S Di Martino
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Intramural Distributions of GAGs and Collagen vs. Opening Angle of the Intact Porcine Aortic Wall.

Authors:  Noor M Ghadie; Jean-Philippe St-Pierre; Michel R Labrosse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Quantification of the heterogeneous effect of static and dynamic perivascular structures on patient-specific local aortic wall mechanics using inverse finite element modeling and DENSE MRI.

Authors:  Johane H Bracamonte; John S Wilson; Joao S Soares
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Effects of age-associated regional changes in aortic stiffness on human hemodynamics revealed by computational modeling.

Authors:  Federica Cuomo; Sara Roccabianca; Desmond Dillon-Murphy; Nan Xiao; Jay D Humphrey; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluation of a New Approach for Modeling Full Ring Stent Bundles with the Inclusion of Manufacturing Strains.

Authors:  Faidon Kyriakou; David Bow; William Dempster; Robbie Brodie; David Nash
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Biomechanical evaluation of ascending aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Andrea Avanzini; Davide Battini; Lorenzo Bagozzi; Gianluigi Bisleri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.