Literature DB >> 23127524

Nutritional and host effects on methanogenesis in the grazing ruminant.

H Clark1.   

Abstract

Concentrations of methane (CH(4)) in the atmosphere have almost doubled since the mid 1700s, and it is estimated that ~30% of the global warming experienced by the planet in the last century and a half can be attributed to CH(4). Between 25% and 40% of anthropogenic CH(4), emissions are estimated to arise from livestock farming. Mitigating absolute emissions from livestock is extremely challenging technically and is made more difficult because of the need to increase food production to meet the demands of a burgeoning world population. Opportunities for manipulating the diet of intensively managed ruminant to reduce absolute CH(4) exist, but in grazing livestock the opportunities are constrained practically and economically. Mitigating emissions per unit of product is more tractable, especially in the short term. Although the formation of CH(4) is an anaerobic microbiological process, the host animal does seem to exert an influence, as animals differ in the quantity of CH(4) they emit when fed the same diet. The reasons for this are not yet clear, but evidence is accumulating that these differences are consistent and have a genetic basis. Exploiting these between animal differences by animal breeding is an attractive mitigation option as it is potentially applicable to all animals and is open to continuous improvement. However, identifying the desired phenotype poses severe practical constraints. Vaccinating the host animal to produce antibodies that can modulate the activities of the organisms responsible for CH(4) formation also presents a novel mitigation option.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23127524     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112001875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

1.  Effects of long-term diet supplementation with Gliricidia sepium foliage mixed with Enterolobium cyclocarpum pods on enteric methane, apparent digestibility, and rumen microbial population in crossbred heifers1.

Authors:  Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero; Maria Denisse Montoya-Flores; Lucas M Zavala-Escalante; Rolando Barahona-Rosales; Jacobo Arango; Juan Carlos Ku-Vera
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Rumen methanogen and protozoal communities of Tibetan sheep and Gansu Alpine Finewool sheep grazing on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.

Authors:  Jinqiang Huang; Yongjuan Li
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.605

3.  Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep.

Authors:  C S Pinares-Patiño; S M Hickey; E A Young; K G Dodds; S MacLean; G Molano; E Sandoval; H Kjestrup; R Harland; C Hunt; N K Pickering; J C McEwan
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ovine rumen papillae biopsy via oral endoscopy; a rapid and repeatable method for serial sampling.

Authors:  K M McRae; M Schultz; C G Mackintosh; G H Shackell; M F Martinez; K J Knowler; M Williams; C Ho; S N Elmes; J C McEwan
Journal:  N Z Vet J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.628

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.