Literature DB >> 23127286

MEK inhibition as a strategy for targeting residual breast cancer cells with low DUSP4 expression.

Sven Rottenberg, Jos Jonkers.   

Abstract

Lack of eradication of disseminated breast cancer by chemotherapy is a central clinical problem. Even tumors that show substantial shrinkage after drug treatment frequently relapse and eventually become refractory to all drugs available. The mechanisms underlying this lack of eradication are largely undefined and it is therefore difficult to develop curative strategies using systemic anti-cancer therapy. In a recent article low DUSP4 expression was reported to activate RAS-ERK signaling in residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This may be a druggable characteristic because MEK inhibition increases docetaxel sensitivity in a xenograft model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23127286      PMCID: PMC4053122          DOI: 10.1186/bcr3327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


Background

Many patients with metastatic breast cancer, in particular those with basal-like breast cancer, initially respond to chemotherapy. Unfortunately, tumors are usually not eradicated, and their relapse is very frustrating for patients and their doctors. Why is it so difficult to cure patients who respond to chemotherapy? Several divergent hypotheses have been proposed to explain this setback (reviewed by Borst [1]). They comprise mechanisms such as lack of drug penetrance ('mechanical resistance'), the presence of quiescent cells, intrinsic biochemical defense mechanisms of cancer stem cells, or the selection of cells within a heterogeneous tumor that contain stochastic alterations allowing survival. Not all residual tumor cells that survive chemotherapy are necessarily drug-resistant cells that multiply in the presence of drug. Sharma and colleagues [2] found in several cell lines a small subpopulation of transiently drug-tolerant cells that were associated with reversible chromatin alterations due to increased gene expression of chromatin-modifying genes (for example, the histone H3K demethylase KDM5A/Jarid1A). Dey-Guha and colleagues [3] suggested that slowly cycling G0-like tumor cells, which are the result of occasional asymmetric divisions and feature low AKT signal, contribute to drug tolerance. The clinical observation that some recurrent tumors respond again to the same drug given initially is consistent with the idea that drug-tolerant cells contribute to the lack of tumor eradication in patients. How to target residual cancer cells? Many scientists think that such tumor cells are cancer stem cells, a hypothesis that is under heated debate [4,5]. According to this hypothesis, there is a rare population of cancer cells with self-renewing capacity that needs to be targeted to eradicate the tumor. To attack those cells, inhibitors of signaling pathways that regulate self-renewal of normal somatic stem cells (for example, Wnt, Sonic Hedgehog and Notch pathways) have been proposed [6], but thus far the benefit of this strategy is limited. Obviously, specificity is a problem and it remains to be seen whether recently identified compounds, such as the dopamine receptor antagonist thioridazine [7], will overcome this hurdle.

Article

In a recent report, Balko and colleagues [8] profiled 49 residual breast cancers (enriched for the triple-negative subtype) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For this purpose 355 transcripts were quantified using NanoString technology [9]. The selection of probes for this analysis was based on previously published prognostic and predictive breast cancer signatures. Cell proliferation, measured by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, was applied as a surrogate marker to measure therapy outcome. The authors found that a low expression of the dual specificity protein phosphatase 4 (DUSP4) correlated with a high Ki-67 score. DUSP4 acts as an ERK phosphatase, and DUSP4 loss could indeed be associated with high ERK activity in basal-like breast cancers. Inhibition of DUSP4 by small interfering RNA reduced the sensitivity of breast cancer cell lines to the microtubule-targeting drug docetaxel. Since DUSP4 negatively regulates the RAS-ERK pathway, the authors hypothesize that low DUSP4 expression may be a marker for response to MEK inhibitors. This notion was supported by experiments with xenotransplanted MDA-231 breast cancer cells. These cells show a low expression of DUSP4 and have increased pERK1/2 levels. When the xenotransplants were treated with the MEK inhibitor AZD6244 (selumetinib), docetaxel sensitivity was enhanced.

Viewpoint

The combination of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway inhibition with chemotherapy remains a hopeful strategy to increase chemotherapy sensitivity of solid tumors. Several promising MEK inhibitors such as PD 0325901 and AZD6244 are currently being tested clinically [10]. Based on the work of Balko and colleagues [8], quantification of DUSP4 gene expression may be useful to predict whether the RAS-ERK pathway is active and whether a patient may benefit from the combination of a MEK inhibitor with taxane-based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the precise mechanism how the activated RAS-ERK pathway causes poor drug response is unknown. In this respect, it would be interesting to investigate whether DUSP4 loss also causes resistance to other chemotherapeutic drugs besides docetaxel, such as to DNA alkylating or cross-linking agents. Cells with low DUSP4 expression show a high Ki-67 score, which is associated with poor long-term outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [11]. Hence, the residual cells that show low DUSP4 expression are not quiescent, drug-tolerant cells. Instead, they appear to be truly drug refractory and proliferate regardless of drug treatment (assuming that no major changes in the Ki-67 score have occurred in the time between the last drug treatment and tumor resection). The hope is that additional MEK inhibition can further slow down the growth of residual breast cancer cells after chemotherapy and provide additional time for patients with metastatic disease. It is questionable, however, whether this strategy is curative. Residual cancer cells may still have another backup: entering a quiescence program and lying low until the drug is gone.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  11 in total

1.  Asymmetric cancer cell division regulated by AKT.

Authors:  Ipsita Dey-Guha; Anita Wolfer; Albert C Yeh; John G Albeck; Revati Darp; Eduardo Leon; Julia Wulfkuhle; Emanuel F Petricoin; Ben S Wittner; Sridhar Ramaswamy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs.

Authors:  Gary K Geiss; Roger E Bumgarner; Brian Birditt; Timothy Dahl; Naeem Dowidar; Dwayne L Dunaway; H Perry Fell; Sean Ferree; Renee D George; Tammy Grogan; Jeffrey J James; Malini Maysuria; Jeffrey D Mitton; Paola Oliveri; Jennifer L Osborn; Tao Peng; Amber L Ratcliffe; Philippa J Webster; Eric H Davidson; Leroy Hood; Krassen Dimitrov
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02-17       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations.

Authors:  Sreenath V Sharma; Diana Y Lee; Bihua Li; Margaret P Quinlan; Fumiyuki Takahashi; Shyamala Maheswaran; Ultan McDermott; Nancy Azizian; Lee Zou; Michael A Fischbach; Kwok-Kin Wong; Kathleyn Brandstetter; Ben Wittner; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Marie Classon; Jeff Settleman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  The cancer stem cell hypothesis: failures and pitfalls.

Authors:  Maryam Rahman; Loic Deleyrolle; Vinata Vedam-Mai; Hassan Azari; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Brent A Reynolds
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Identification of drugs including a dopamine receptor antagonist that selectively target cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Eleftherios Sachlos; Ruth M Risueño; Sarah Laronde; Zoya Shapovalova; Jong-Hee Lee; Jennifer Russell; Monika Malig; Jamie D McNicol; Aline Fiebig-Comyn; Monica Graham; Marilyne Levadoux-Martin; Jung Bok Lee; Andrew O Giacomelli; John A Hassell; Daniela Fischer-Russell; Michael R Trus; Ronan Foley; Brian Leber; Anargyros Xenocostas; Eric D Brown; Tony J Collins; Mickie Bhatia
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Targeting the MAPK-RAS-RAF signaling pathway in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Libero Santarpia; Scott M Lippman; Adel K El-Naggar
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 7.  The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges.

Authors:  Hans Clevers
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 8.  Tumour-initiating cells: challenges and opportunities for anticancer drug discovery.

Authors:  Bin-Bing S Zhou; Haiying Zhang; Marc Damelin; Kenneth G Geles; Justin C Grindley; Peter B Dirks
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  Profiling of residual breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy identifies DUSP4 deficiency as a mechanism of drug resistance.

Authors:  Justin M Balko; Rebecca S Cook; David B Vaught; María G Kuba; Todd W Miller; Neil E Bhola; Melinda E Sanders; Nara M Granja-Ingram; J Joshua Smith; Ingrid M Meszoely; Janine Salter; Mitch Dowsett; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Ana M González-Angulo; Gordon B Mills; Joseph A Pinto; Henry L Gómez; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Robin L Jones; Janine Salter; Roger A'Hern; Ash Nerurkar; Marina Parton; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Ian E Smith; Mitchell Dowsett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  4 in total

1.  USP18 directly regulates Snail1 protein through ubiquitination pathway in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fakun Huang; Chengying Zheng; Longkai Huang; Changqing Lin; Jiaxing Wang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  Dual specificity phosphatase 4 gene expression in association with triple-negative breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Michelle L Baglia; Qiuyin Cai; Ying Zheng; Jie Wu; Yinghao Su; Fei Ye; Ping-Ping Bao; Hui Cai; Zhiguo Zhao; Justin Balko; Wei Zheng; Wei Lu; Xiao-Ou Shu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Chronic loss of STAG2 leads to altered chromatin structure contributing to de-regulated transcription in AML.

Authors:  James S Smith; Katrina M Lappin; Stephanie G Craig; Fabio G Liberante; Clare M Crean; Simon S McDade; Alexander Thompson; Ken I Mills; Kienan I Savage
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  DUSP4 promotes doxorubicin resistance in gastric cancer through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Xing Kang; Minhuan Li; Hao Zhu; Xiaofeng Lu; Ji Miao; Shangce Du; Xuefeng Xia; Wenxian Guan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.