Literature DB >> 2312684

Discordant results between the broth disk elution and broth microdilution susceptibility tests with Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.

K E Aldridge1, A Henderberg, D D Schiro, C V Sanders.   

Abstract

Susceptibility testing of 161 clinical isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group was performed to compare interpretive results generated by the broth disk elution and broth microdilution methods recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Among the cephalosporin-cephamycin compounds tested, correlation was poorest for ceftizoxime (71%), ceftriaxone (57%), and cefotaxime (47%); when the tests did not correlate, false resistance was seen 92, 95, and 93% of the time, respectively. Cefotetan and cefoperazone showed lack of correlation in 19 and 20% of the tests, respectively. For cefotetan, false resistance was more frequent, while with cefoperazone, false susceptibility occurred more often. Cefoxitin produced the fewest discrepancies; 10% of the disk elution tests produced either false-resistance or false-susceptibility results. Mezlocillin and piperacillin showed lack of correlation in 8 and 14% of the tests, respectively, and discrepancies were due primarily to false-resistance results. Overall with the beta-lactams, 84% of the discordant interpretive results were false resistance by the broth disk elution test. Clindamycin had a discrepancy rate of 10%, with the majority of discrepancies being false susceptibility disk elution results. Because of the high number of discrepancies noted with ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime, we recommend that these drugs not be tested by the disk elution method and that they be tested by a quantitative MIC method such as the broth microdilution test. Furthermore, caution should be exercised when interpreting broth disk elution results with all the beta-lactams included in this study except imipenem. These data indicate the lack of correlation of results between these two tests for many beta-lactams and suggest the need for a reexamination of the disk elution method to provide a more accurately standardized test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2312684      PMCID: PMC269614          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.2.375-378.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  6 in total

1.  Predicting the susceptibility of anaerobes to cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and cefoxitin with the thioglycolate broth disk procedure.

Authors:  R J Zabransky; R J Birk; T A Kurzynski; K L Toohey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Determination of susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to cefotetan and cefoxitin by the thioglycolate disk elution method.

Authors:  A L Barry; R R Packer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of broth disk elution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria with the newer beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J S Redding; A W Howell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of three broth disk methods for testing the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to imipenem.

Authors:  D L Shungu; E Weinberg; A T Cerami
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Ceftizoxime and cefoxitin susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria: comparison of results from three NCCLS methods and quality control recommendations for the reference agar dilution procedure.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; P C Fuchs; S D Allen
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States: analysis by site of isolation.

Authors:  G J Cuchural; F P Tally; N V Jacobus; K Aldridge; T Cleary; S M Finegold; G Hill; P Iannini; J P O'Keefe; C Pierson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Anaerobic susceptibility tests with single breakpoint concentrations.

Authors:  A L Barry
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  The Search for a Practical Method for Colistin Susceptibility Testing: Have We Found It by Going Back to the Future?

Authors:  Michael J Satlin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.