OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of aspirin in the prevention of pre-eclampsia in high-risk women. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING:Maternity clinics in ten Finnish hospitals participating in the PREDO Project. SAMPLE: A total of 152 women with risk factors for pre-eclampsia and abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry. METHODS: Participants were randomised to start either aspirin 100 mg/day or placebo at 12 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks + days of gestation. Because of the limited power of this trial, we also conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that included data on 346 women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry, and aspirin 50-150 mg/day started at or before 16( ) weeks of gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension and birthweight standard deviation (SD) score. Outcome measures for the meta-analysis were pre-eclampsia, severe pre-eclampsia, preterm (diagnosed <37 + 0 weeks of gestation) and term pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: From the 152 randomised women, 121 were included in the final analysis. Low-dose aspirin did not reduce the rate of pre-eclampsia (relative risk [RR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7); gestational hypertension (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.6-4.2); early-onset pre-eclampsia (diagnosed <34 + 0 weeks of gestation) (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.03-2.1); or severe pre-eclampsia (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.3); and the results were not statistically significant in an intention-to-treat analysis. However, our meta-analysis, including the current data, suggested that low-dose aspirin initiated before 16 weeks of gestation reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8) and severe pre-eclampsia (RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our trial showed no statistically significant effect of aspirin in preventing pre-eclampsia in high-risk women. However, our meta-analysis suggested that aspirin may reduce the incidence of pre-eclampsia.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of aspirin in the prevention of pre-eclampsia in high-risk women. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Maternity clinics in ten Finnish hospitals participating in the PREDO Project. SAMPLE: A total of 152 women with risk factors for pre-eclampsia and abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry. METHODS:Participants were randomised to start either aspirin 100 mg/day or placebo at 12 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks + days of gestation. Because of the limited power of this trial, we also conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that included data on 346 women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry, and aspirin 50-150 mg/day started at or before 16( ) weeks of gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension and birthweight standard deviation (SD) score. Outcome measures for the meta-analysis were pre-eclampsia, severe pre-eclampsia, preterm (diagnosed <37 + 0 weeks of gestation) and term pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: From the 152 randomised women, 121 were included in the final analysis. Low-dose aspirin did not reduce the rate of pre-eclampsia (relative risk [RR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7); gestational hypertension (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.6-4.2); early-onset pre-eclampsia (diagnosed <34 + 0 weeks of gestation) (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.03-2.1); or severe pre-eclampsia (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.3); and the results were not statistically significant in an intention-to-treat analysis. However, our meta-analysis, including the current data, suggested that low-dose aspirin initiated before 16 weeks of gestation reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8) and severe pre-eclampsia (RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our trial showed no statistically significant effect of aspirin in preventing pre-eclampsia in high-risk women. However, our meta-analysis suggested that aspirin may reduce the incidence of pre-eclampsia.
Authors: Lindsay D Levine; Tiffany L Holland; Keewan Kim; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: Can J Physiol Pharmacol Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Mary Catherine Tolcher; Derrick M Chu; Lisa M Hollier; Joan M Mastrobattista; Diana A Racusin; Susan M Ramin; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Kjersti M Aagaard Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 8.661