Literature DB >> 23126243

Determining measures of insight and foresight from responses to multiple choice questions.

Mike Tweed1, Mark Thompson-Fawcett, Peter Schwartz, Tim J Wilkinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical decisions require insight and foresight. When these are lacking, overconfidence and error can occur. AIMS: Multiple choice questions (MCQ) responses were used to estimate insight, as determined by confidence in responses, and foresight, as determined by the safety of incorrect responses.
METHODS: An MCQ response system was developed which reflected confidence in, and safeness of, responses. An optional examination incorporating this system was offered to medical students at one university.
RESULTS: A total of 372 students completed the study. There was evidence of insight. The proportion of responses that were correct rose from 32% for low confidence to 77% for high confidence. The proportion that was incorrect and not unsafe fell from 34% for low confidence to 7% for high confidence. There was less evidence of foresight. Of the responses that were incorrect, the proportion that was unsafe increased from 52% for low confidence to 68% for high confidence. Measures of insight and foresight increased with experience. Students with poorer knowledge chose more unsafe responses, but with lower confidence. Five students gave multiple highly unsafe responses held with high confidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Students had insight but less foresight. Experience and knowledge altered measures of both. This response system identified students who appeared to lack both.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23126243     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  5 in total

1.  Certainty and safe consequence responses provide additional information from multiple choice question assessments.

Authors:  M J Tweed; S Stein; T J Wilkinson; G Purdie; J Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  The interrelationship between confidence and correctness in a multiple-choice assessment: pointing out misconceptions and assuring valuable questions.

Authors:  Renata Grazziotin-Soares; Coca Blue; Rachel Feraro; Kristen Tochor; Thiago Machado Ardenghi; Donald Curtis; Diego Machado Ardenghi
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2021-02-12

3.  Formative Assessment of Diagnostic Testing in Family Medicine with Comprehensive MCQ Followed by Certainty-Based Mark.

Authors:  Charles Herbaux; Aurélie Dupré; Wendy Rénier; Ludovic Gabellier; Emmanuel Chazard; Philippe Lambert; Vincent Sobanski; Didier Gosset; Dominique Lacroix; Patrick Truffert
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17

4.  Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options.

Authors:  Mike Tweed
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Defining and tracking medical student self-monitoring using multiple-choice question item certainty.

Authors:  Mike Tweed; Gordon Purdie; Tim Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.