Literature DB >> 23125818

5-Phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine.

Man-Man Song1, Kong-Li Wu, Lin Zhu, Juan Zheng, Yan Xu.   

Abstract

In the title complex, C(8)H(7)N(3)O, the C-O [1.369 (2) and 1.364 (3) Å] and C=n class="Chemical">N [1.285 (3) and 1.289 (3) Å] bond lengths in the oxadiazole ring are each almost identical within systematic errors, although different substituents are attached to the ring. The phenyl ring is inclined to the planar oxadiazole ring [r.m.s. deviation 0.002 Å] by 13.42 (18)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked via N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming double-stranded chains propagating along [010].

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23125818      PMCID: PMC3470405          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to 5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amines and the synthesis of the title compound, see: Bachwani et al. (2011 ▶); Lv et al. (2010 ▶); Tang et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H7N3O M = 161.17 Monoclinic, a = 11.194 (3) Å b = 5.8990 (5) Å c = 15.034 (5) Å β = 130.193 (18)° V = 758.3 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 291 K 0.26 × 0.24 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Agilent Xcalibur Eos Gemini diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011 ▶) T min = 0.851, T max = 1.000 2912 measured reflections 1551 independent reflections 877 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.040

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.056 wR(F 2) = 0.137 S = 1.02 1551 reflections 109 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040640/im2386sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040640/im2386Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H7N3OF(000) = 336
Mr = 161.17Dx = 1.412 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.7107 Å
a = 11.194 (3) ÅCell parameters from 656 reflections
b = 5.8990 (5) Åθ = 3.5–26.3°
c = 15.034 (5) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 130.193 (18)°T = 291 K
V = 758.3 (3) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 40.26 × 0.24 × 0.22 mm
Agilent Xcalibur Eos Gemini diffractometer1551 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source877 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.040
Detector resolution: 16.2312 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 3.6°
ω scansh = −13→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)k = −4→7
Tmin = 0.851, Tmax = 1.000l = −18→17
2912 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.137H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.054P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1551 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.15 e Å3
Experimental. CrysAlisPro, Agilent Technologies, Version 1.171.35.19 (release 27-10-2011 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Oct 27 2011,15:02:11) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O1−0.15541 (17)0.6145 (2)0.02276 (13)0.0495 (5)
N1−0.2177 (2)0.2637 (3)−0.04164 (18)0.0617 (7)
N2−0.3435 (2)0.4062 (3)−0.12624 (17)0.0594 (7)
N3−0.3795 (2)0.8025 (3)−0.12550 (17)0.0622 (7)
H3A−0.46280.8128−0.20120.075*
H3B−0.31610.9341−0.09220.075*
C10.1056 (3)0.1191 (4)0.1680 (2)0.0624 (8)
H10.05060.01250.10840.075*
C20.2512 (3)0.0674 (4)0.2723 (3)0.0683 (9)
H20.2942−0.07490.28250.082*
C30.3329 (3)0.2221 (5)0.3606 (2)0.0714 (9)
H30.43080.18500.43030.086*
C40.2704 (3)0.4311 (5)0.3463 (2)0.0720 (9)
H40.32590.53650.40650.086*
C50.1250 (3)0.4866 (4)0.2428 (2)0.0578 (8)
H50.08280.62920.23360.069*
C60.0423 (3)0.3320 (4)0.1532 (2)0.0457 (6)
C7−0.1115 (3)0.3912 (4)0.0434 (2)0.0450 (6)
C8−0.3014 (3)0.6083 (4)−0.0839 (2)0.0477 (7)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0394 (10)0.0366 (9)0.0426 (9)−0.0023 (7)0.0129 (8)−0.0024 (7)
N10.0457 (13)0.0409 (11)0.0551 (13)−0.0007 (10)0.0129 (11)−0.0039 (10)
N20.0413 (12)0.0417 (12)0.0529 (13)−0.0017 (10)0.0112 (11)−0.0038 (10)
N30.0462 (13)0.0409 (12)0.0514 (13)0.0025 (10)0.0097 (11)0.0036 (10)
C10.0511 (17)0.0476 (15)0.0623 (17)−0.0008 (13)0.0247 (15)−0.0049 (13)
C20.0508 (17)0.0531 (16)0.0730 (19)0.0128 (14)0.0273 (16)0.0128 (14)
C30.0463 (16)0.075 (2)0.0537 (18)0.0022 (15)0.0143 (14)0.0111 (15)
C40.0611 (19)0.067 (2)0.0468 (16)−0.0069 (16)0.0164 (15)−0.0053 (14)
C50.0522 (17)0.0457 (14)0.0529 (16)0.0005 (12)0.0236 (15)−0.0019 (12)
C60.0391 (14)0.0415 (13)0.0467 (14)0.0012 (11)0.0232 (12)0.0037 (11)
C70.0404 (14)0.0330 (12)0.0487 (14)−0.0002 (11)0.0229 (12)0.0003 (11)
C80.0365 (14)0.0447 (14)0.0422 (13)−0.0044 (12)0.0164 (12)−0.0025 (12)
O1—C71.369 (2)C1—C61.387 (3)
O1—C81.364 (3)C2—H20.9300
N1—N21.413 (3)C2—C31.366 (4)
N1—C71.285 (3)C3—H30.9300
N2—C81.289 (3)C3—C41.364 (4)
N3—H3A0.8936C4—H40.9300
N3—H3B0.9476C4—C51.382 (3)
N3—C81.328 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—H10.9300C5—C61.376 (3)
C1—C21.382 (3)C6—C71.464 (3)
C8—O1—C7102.89 (16)C3—C4—H4119.9
C7—N1—N2106.97 (18)C3—C4—C5120.2 (2)
C8—N2—N1105.75 (18)C5—C4—H4119.9
H3A—N3—H3B115.3C4—C5—H5119.8
C8—N3—H3A119.2C6—C5—C4120.3 (2)
C8—N3—H3B114.6C6—C5—H5119.8
C2—C1—H1120.4C1—C6—C7120.3 (2)
C2—C1—C6119.2 (2)C5—C6—C1119.5 (2)
C6—C1—H1120.4C5—C6—C7120.3 (2)
C1—C2—H2119.5O1—C7—C6118.30 (19)
C3—C2—C1121.0 (2)N1—C7—O1111.77 (19)
C3—C2—H2119.5N1—C7—C6129.9 (2)
C2—C3—H3120.1N2—C8—O1112.6 (2)
C4—C3—C2119.8 (3)N2—C8—N3130.2 (2)
C4—C3—H3120.1N3—C8—O1117.12 (19)
N1—N2—C8—O10.7 (3)C4—C5—C6—C10.5 (4)
N1—N2—C8—N3−176.1 (3)C4—C5—C6—C7−179.8 (2)
N2—N1—C7—O1−0.4 (3)C5—C6—C7—O113.9 (3)
N2—N1—C7—C6−180.0 (2)C5—C6—C7—N1−166.5 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C40.1 (5)C6—C1—C2—C30.3 (4)
C1—C6—C7—O1−166.5 (2)C7—O1—C8—N2−0.9 (3)
C1—C6—C7—N113.1 (4)C7—O1—C8—N3176.4 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.5 (4)C7—N1—N2—C8−0.2 (3)
C2—C1—C6—C7179.8 (3)C8—O1—C7—N10.8 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.1 (5)C8—O1—C7—C6−179.6 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.2 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3A···N2i0.892.122.997 (3)169
N3—H3B···N1ii0.952.123.054 (3)168
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N3—H3A⋯N2i 0.892.122.997 (3)169
N3—H3B⋯N1ii 0.952.123.054 (3)168

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis, infrared and fluorescence spectra of lanthanide complexes with a new amide-based 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivative.

Authors:  Xiao-Liang Tang; Wei Dou; Su-Wen Chen; Fang-Fang Dang; Wei-Sheng Liu
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.098

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.