Literature DB >> 23125764

2,2'-Diethoxy-4,4'-[(E,E)-hydrazine-diyl-idenebis(methanylylidene)]diphenol.

Wisam Naji Atiyah Al-Mehana1, Rosiyah Yahya, Faridah Sonsudin, Ihsan Naji Atiyah Al-Mehana, Kong Mun Lo.   

Abstract

The complete molecule of the title compound, C(18)H(20)N(2)O(4), is generated by inversion symmetry. The conformation around the C=N bond is E. With the exception of the eth-oxy substituent, the mol-ecule is essentially planar with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.0455 Å. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds into a two-dimensional supra-molecular network parallel to the bc plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23125764      PMCID: PMC3470351          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812038354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the structure of 4,4′-(1E,1′E)-1,2-diylidenebis(methan-1-yl-1-yl­idene) bis­(2-meth­oxy­phenol), see: Qu et al. (2005 ▶). For applications of azines and their derivatives, see: Dudis et al. (1993 ▶); Facchetti et al. (2002 ▶); Kim et al. (2010 ▶); Pandeya et al. (1999 ▶); Wadher et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C18H20N2O4 M = 328.36 Monoclinic, a = 5.2176 (1) Å b = 10.3422 (1) Å c = 14.9135 (2) Å β = 97.206 (1)° V = 798.40 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.16 × 0.08 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) ▶ T min = 0.650, T max = 0.746 7447 measured reflections 1831 independent reflections 1654 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.020

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034 wR(F 2) = 0.098 S = 1.05 1831 reflections 111 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.33 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812038354/zj2092sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812038354/zj2092Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C18H20N2O4F(000) = 348
Mr = 328.36Dx = 1.366 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMelting point = 471–472 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ynMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.2176 (1) ÅCell parameters from 4187 reflections
b = 10.3422 (1) Åθ = 2.4–28.4°
c = 14.9135 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 97.206 (1)°T = 100 K
V = 798.40 (2) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 20.16 × 0.08 × 0.08 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1831 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1654 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.020
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.650, Tmax = 0.746k = −13→13
7447 measured reflectionsl = −19→18
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.098H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.052P)2 + 0.3158P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1831 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
111 parametersΔρmax = 0.33 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C11.1226 (2)0.61425 (10)0.43730 (7)0.0140 (2)
H11.27700.62540.47760.017*
C21.0867 (2)0.69416 (10)0.35602 (7)0.0138 (2)
C31.2699 (2)0.79013 (10)0.34702 (7)0.0150 (2)
H31.41630.79820.39140.018*
C41.2397 (2)0.87397 (10)0.27353 (7)0.0149 (2)
H41.36470.93940.26830.018*
C51.0277 (2)0.86239 (10)0.20780 (7)0.0137 (2)
C60.84916 (19)0.76106 (10)0.21383 (7)0.0133 (2)
C70.87615 (19)0.67949 (10)0.28809 (7)0.0140 (2)
H70.75210.61350.29310.017*
C80.4920 (2)0.64171 (10)0.14038 (7)0.0163 (2)
H8B0.39660.64160.19370.020*
H8A0.59540.56140.14120.020*
C90.3053 (2)0.64918 (12)0.05452 (8)0.0217 (3)
H9A0.21110.73130.05290.033*
H9B0.18250.57720.05280.033*
H9C0.40110.64390.00220.033*
N10.95919 (17)0.52993 (9)0.45792 (6)0.0138 (2)
O10.65817 (14)0.75311 (7)0.14250 (5)0.0160 (2)
O21.00276 (14)0.94690 (7)0.13780 (5)0.01629 (19)
H20.84620.95320.11670.024*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0148 (5)0.0157 (5)0.0109 (5)0.0022 (4)−0.0010 (3)−0.0018 (4)
C20.0150 (5)0.0141 (5)0.0119 (5)0.0026 (4)0.0011 (4)−0.0007 (4)
C30.0139 (5)0.0169 (5)0.0136 (5)0.0009 (4)−0.0013 (4)−0.0016 (4)
C40.0143 (5)0.0141 (5)0.0162 (5)−0.0011 (4)0.0012 (4)−0.0007 (4)
C50.0155 (5)0.0131 (5)0.0127 (5)0.0020 (4)0.0025 (4)0.0007 (4)
C60.0125 (5)0.0146 (5)0.0123 (5)0.0010 (4)−0.0004 (4)−0.0009 (4)
C70.0147 (5)0.0139 (5)0.0134 (5)−0.0002 (4)0.0012 (4)0.0004 (4)
C80.0168 (5)0.0154 (5)0.0156 (5)−0.0036 (4)−0.0017 (4)0.0009 (4)
C90.0225 (6)0.0236 (6)0.0172 (5)−0.0062 (4)−0.0043 (4)0.0018 (4)
N10.0162 (4)0.0148 (4)0.0098 (4)0.0031 (3)−0.0008 (3)0.0004 (3)
O10.0162 (4)0.0167 (4)0.0135 (4)−0.0036 (3)−0.0039 (3)0.0033 (3)
O20.0144 (4)0.0169 (4)0.0167 (4)−0.0009 (3)−0.0014 (3)0.0052 (3)
C1—N11.2835 (14)C6—C71.3853 (14)
C1—C21.4596 (14)C7—H70.9500
C1—H10.9500C8—O11.4399 (12)
C2—C31.3959 (15)C8—C91.5106 (14)
C2—C71.4062 (14)C8—H8B0.9900
C3—C41.3910 (15)C8—H8A0.9900
C3—H30.9500C9—H9A0.9800
C4—C51.3880 (14)C9—H9B0.9800
C4—H40.9500C9—H9C0.9800
C5—O21.3551 (12)N1—N1i1.4163 (16)
C5—C61.4126 (14)O2—H20.8400
C6—O11.3658 (12)
N1—C1—C2124.33 (9)C6—C7—C2120.14 (9)
N1—C1—H1117.8C6—C7—H7119.9
C2—C1—H1117.8C2—C7—H7119.9
C3—C2—C7119.34 (9)O1—C8—C9107.47 (8)
C3—C2—C1117.68 (9)O1—C8—H8B110.2
C7—C2—C1122.98 (9)C9—C8—H8B110.2
C4—C3—C2120.52 (9)O1—C8—H8A110.2
C4—C3—H3119.7C9—C8—H8A110.2
C2—C3—H3119.7H8B—C8—H8A108.5
C5—C4—C3120.27 (10)C8—C9—H9A109.5
C5—C4—H4119.9C8—C9—H9B109.5
C3—C4—H4119.9H9A—C9—H9B109.5
O2—C5—C4118.65 (9)C8—C9—H9C109.5
O2—C5—C6121.81 (9)H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C4—C5—C6119.51 (9)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
O1—C6—C7125.25 (9)C1—N1—N1i111.99 (10)
O1—C6—C5114.69 (9)C6—O1—C8116.35 (8)
C7—C6—C5120.07 (9)C5—O2—H2109.5
N1—C1—C2—C3174.08 (10)C4—C5—C6—C74.43 (15)
N1—C1—C2—C7−5.05 (16)O1—C6—C7—C2177.64 (9)
C7—C2—C3—C42.56 (15)C5—C6—C7—C2−2.41 (15)
C1—C2—C3—C4−176.60 (9)C3—C2—C7—C6−1.07 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.53 (16)C1—C2—C7—C6178.05 (9)
C3—C4—C5—O2179.09 (9)C2—C1—N1—N1i−178.00 (10)
C3—C4—C5—C6−2.96 (15)C7—C6—O1—C8−7.68 (15)
O2—C5—C6—O12.27 (14)C5—C6—O1—C8172.36 (9)
C4—C5—C6—O1−175.61 (9)C9—C8—O1—C6−177.35 (9)
O2—C5—C6—C7−177.68 (9)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N1ii0.841.992.7787 (12)156
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯N1i 0.841.992.7787 (12)156

Symmetry code: (i) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis, antibacterial, antifungal and anti-HIV evaluation of Schiff and Mannich bases of isatin derivatives with 3-amino-2-methylmercapto quinazolin-4(3H)-one.

Authors:  S N Pandeya; D Sriram; G Nath; E De Clercq
Journal:  Pharm Acta Helv       Date:  1999-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.