| Literature DB >> 23125526 |
Deepak Kumar Behera1, Pabitra Mohan Behera, Laxmikanta Acharya, Anshuman Dixit, Payodhar Padhi.
Abstract
Influenza is an infectious disease caused by RNA viruses of the family Orthomyxoviridae. The new influenza H1N1 viral stain has emerged by the genetic combination of genes from human, pig, and bird's H1N1 virus. The influenza virus is roughly spherical and is enveloped by a lipid membrane. There are two glycoproteins in this lipid membrane; namely, hemagglutinin (HA) which helps in attachment of the viral strain on the host cell surface and neuraminidase (NA) that is responsible for initiation of viral infection. We have developed homology models of both Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase receptors from H1N1 strains in eastern India. The docking studies of B-Sialic acid and O-Sialic acid in the optimized and energy-minimized homology models show important H-bonding interactions with ALA142, ASP230, GLN231, GLU232, and THR141. This information can be used for structure-based and pharmacophore-based new drug design. We have also calculated ADME properties (Human Oral Absorption (HOA) and % HOA) for Oseltamivir which have been subject of debate for long.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23125526 PMCID: PMC3483830 DOI: 10.1155/2012/714623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Figure 3(a) Docking of Oseltamivir on the NA surface reported from Schrodinger, (b) interaction of Oseltamivir on the NA by hydrogen-bond.
Figure 4(a) Docking of Beta-Sialic acid on molecular surface of HA protein by Schrodinger, (b) docking of O-Sialic acid on molecular surface of HA protein by Schrodinger; (c) interaction of B-Sialic acid with HA protein by hydrogen-bond, and (d) interaction of O-Sialic acid with HA protein by hydrogen-bond.
Docking of Oseltamivir, Beta-Sialic acid, and O-Sialic acid from XP method.
| Sl. no. | Ligands | GScore | Lipophilic | H-bond | Electrostatic | Low MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oseltamivir | –5.18 | –1.10 | –1.50 | –2.67 | –0.46 |
| 2 | B-Sialic acid | –9.74 | –0.92 | –6.77 | –2.00 | –0.47 |
| 3 | O-Sialic acid | –8.65 | –0.93 | –5.73 | –2.00 | –0.47 |
Lipophilic: ChemScore lipophilic pair term and fraction of a protein-ligand vdW energy.
Hbond: ChemScore H-bond pair term.
Electrostatic: electrostatic rewards.
Low MW: Rewards for ligand with low molecular weight.
Model evaluation statistics of NA and HA by PROCHECK_NT standalone version.
| Protein | Programs | [A, B, L] | [a, b, l, p] | [~a, ~b, ~l, ~p] | Disallowed region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | Modeller 9.9 | 354 (91.20%) | 30 (07.70%) | 3 (0.80%) | 1 (0.30%) |
| I-TASSER | 324 (83.50%) | 57 (14.70%) | 4 (1.00%) | 3 (0.80%) | |
| HA | Modeller 9.9 | 264 (90.10%) | 27 (9.20%) | 2 (0.70%) | 0 (0.00%) |
| I-TASSER | 228 (77.80%) | 60 (20.50%) | 3 (1.00%) | 2 (0.70%) |
Figure 13D representation of NA best model.
Figure 23D representation of HA best model.
Hydrogen-bond interaction parameters for each compound with NA and HA receptors.
| Sl. no. | Residue involved | Ligand atom involved | H-bond distance (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Oseltamivir on NA receptor | |||
| 1 | ARG109 | O | 1.832 |
| 2 | ARG143 | O | 2.280 |
| 3 | ARG143 | O | 2.407 |
| 4 | GLU219 | N | 1.760 |
|
| |||
| B-Sialic on HA receptor | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | ALA142 | O | 2.137 |
| 2 | ASP230 | O | 2.047 |
| 3 | GLN231 | O | 2.032 |
| 4 | GLN231 | O | 1.965 |
| 5 | GLN231 | O | 1.910 |
| 6 | GLU232 | O | 2.182 |
| 7 | THR141 | O | 2.224 |
| 8 | THR141 | O | 1.796 |
|
| |||
| O-Sialic on HA receptor | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | ALA142 | O | 2.136 |
| 2 | ASP230 | O | 1.966 |
| 3 | ASP230 | O | 1.928 |
| 4 | GLN231 | O | 2.073 |
| 5 | GLN231 | O | 1.995 |
| 6 | GLU232 | O | 2.217 |
| 7 | THR141 | O | 2.215 |
| 8 | THR141 | O | 1.830 |
Important ADME properties of Oseltamivir conformers as reported from Schrodinger.
| Sl. no. | Molecule | QPlogS | QPlogBB | QPlogKp | HOA | Percent HOA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oseltamivir | –1.927 | –0.921 | –5.303 | 3 | 66.024 |
| 2 | Oseltamivir | –2.389 | –0.809 | –5.120 | 3 | 70.229 |
| 3 | Oseltamivir | –2.199 | –1.021 | –5.420 | 3 | 65.346 |
| 4 | Oseltamivir | –2.017 | –0.780 | –5.121 | 3 | 69.130 |
| 5 | Oseltamivir | –1.763 | –0.782 | –5.110 | 3 | 68.065 |
| 6 | Oseltamivir | –2.231 | –0.769 | –5.086 | 3 | 70.294 |
| 7 | Oseltamivir | –1.981 | –0.867 | –5.222 | 3 | 67.360 |
| 8 | Oseltamivir | –1.993 | –0.907 | –5.304 | 3 | 66.440 |
| 9 | Oseltamivir | –1.984 | –0.929 | –5.340 | 3 | 65.989 |
| 10 | Oseltamivir | –2.438 | –0.788 | –5.078 | 3 | 70.885 |
| 11 | Oseltamivir | –2.035 | –0.897 | –5.285 | 3 | 66.988 |
| 12 | Oseltamivir | –2.035 | –0.764 | –5.102 | 3 | 69.586 |
| 13 | Oseltamivir | –1.870 | –0.948 | –5.375 | 3 | 65.114 |
| 14 | Oseltamivir | –2.170 | –0.781 | –5.107 | 3 | 69.772 |
| 15 | Oseltamivir | –1.928 | –0.927 | –5.312 | 3 | 65.961 |
| 16 | Oseltamivir | –2.010 | –0.902 | –5.293 | 3 | 66.648 |
QPlogS: predicted aqueous solubility.
QPlogBB: predicted brain/blood partition coefficient.
QPlogKp: predicted skin permeability.
HOA: predicted qualitative human oral absorption.
PercentHOA: predicted human oral absorption on 0 to 100% scale.