Literature DB >> 23125342

Low-pass filters and differential tympanal tuning in a paleotropical bushcricket with an unusually low frequency call.

Kaveri Rajaraman1, Natasha Mhatre, Manjari Jain, Mathew Postles, Rohini Balakrishnan, Daniel Robert.   

Abstract

Low-frequency sounds are advantageous for long-range acoustic signal transmission, but for small animals they constitute a challenge for signal detection and localization. The efficient detection of sound in insects is enhanced by mechanical resonance either in the tracheal or tympanal system before subsequent neuronal amplification. Making small structures resonant at low sound frequencies poses challenges for insects and has not been adequately studied. Similarly, detecting the direction of long-wavelength sound using interaural signal amplitude and/or phase differences is difficult for small animals. Pseudophylline bushcrickets predominantly call at high, often ultrasonic frequencies, but a few paleotropical species use lower frequencies. We investigated the mechanical frequency tuning of the tympana of one such species, Onomarchus uninotatus, a large bushcricket that produces a narrow bandwidth call at an unusually low carrier frequency of 3.2 kHz. Onomarchus uninotatus, like most bushcrickets, has two large tympanal membranes on each fore-tibia. We found that both these membranes vibrate like hinged flaps anchored at the dorsal wall and do not show higher modes of vibration in the frequency range investigated (1.5-20 kHz). The anterior tympanal membrane acts as a low-pass filter, attenuating sounds at frequencies above 3.5 kHz, in contrast to the high-pass filter characteristic of other bushcricket tympana. Responses to higher frequencies are partitioned to the posterior tympanal membrane, which shows maximal sensitivity at several broad frequency ranges, peaking at 3.1, 7.4 and 14.4 kHz. This partitioning between the two tympanal membranes constitutes an unusual feature of peripheral auditory processing in insects. The complex tracheal shape of O. uninotatus also deviates from the known tube or horn shapes associated with simple band-pass or high-pass amplification of tracheal input to the tympana. Interestingly, while the anterior tympanal membrane shows directional sensitivity at conspecific call frequencies, the posterior tympanal membrane is not directional at conspecific frequencies and instead shows directionality at higher frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23125342     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.078352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of hearing in katydids.

Authors:  Fernando Montealegre-Z; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Selective forces on origin, adaptation and reduction of tympanal ears in insects.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Andreas Stumpner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Functional basis of the sexual dimorphism in the auditory fovea of the duetting bushcricket Ancylecha fenestrata.

Authors:  Jan Scherberich; Jennifer Hummel; Stefan Schöneich; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Auditory mechanics in a bush-cricket: direct evidence of dual sound inputs in the pressure difference receiver.

Authors:  Thorin Jonsson; Fernando Montealegre-Z; Carl D Soulsbury; Kate A Robson Brown; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Comparative micromechanics of bushcricket ears with and without a specialized auditory fovea region in the crista acustica.

Authors:  Jan Scherberich; Roxana Taszus; Alexander Stoessel; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.