Literature DB >> 23124014

Evaluation of neophobia and its potential impact upon predator control techniques: a study on two sympatric foxes in southern Patagonia.

Alejandro Travaini1, Aldo Iván Vassallo, Germán Oscar García, Alejandra Isabel Echeverría, Sonia Cristina Zapata, Sigrid Nielsen.   

Abstract

An alternative approach to increase the efficiency of predator control and selectivity is to consider the natural behavioural repertoire of the target species and how such behaviours may increase their vulnerability. Neophobia, or the hesitancy to approach a novel food item, object, or place, is an important factor influencing the investigative behaviour of animals, and its incorporation to predator control techniques may help to reduce losses of livestock to predators. In this study, we simultaneously evaluated the existence and intensity of neophobic responses in two sympatric fox species, the Culpeo (Pseudalopex culpaeus) and the Grey (P. griseus) foxes in southern Patagonia, Argentina. For this purpose, we used bait stations to compare fox behavioural responses in the absence (pre-treatment), presence (treatment) and removal (post-treatment) of a novel stimulus, which consisted of an orange PVC-traffic cone. Both fox species showed a neophobic response: bait-station visitation rates decreased (P=0.005 and P=0.048, for Culpeo and Grey foxes, respectively) in the presence of the novel object. The intensity of the response differed between species being higher for Culpeo foxes (approximately 80% of reduction in visitation rate during treatment for Culpeo foxes vs. 10% for Grey foxes). However, the bait-station visitation pattern after novel object removal indicated that animals probably increased exploration of the station. The high level of neophobia achieved by the Culpeo fox, together with an increase in post-treatment site exploration, suggests that behavioural manipulations (reduction of neophobia and its consequent increase in risk taking) could improve selective and efficient fox control in rural areas where livestock production is a major economic activity.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23124014     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  2 in total

1.  A New Method for Noninvasive Genetic Sampling of Saliva in Ecological Research.

Authors:  Diana Lobo; Raquel Godinho; Francisco Álvares; José V López-Bao; Alejandro Rodríguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Behavioral differences at scent stations between two exploited species of desert canids.

Authors:  Maksim Sergeyev; Kelsey A Richards; Kristen S Ellis; Lucas K Hall; Jason A Wood; Randy T Larsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.