Literature DB >> 23122889

Treatment and outcomes of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes in relation to initial diagnostic impressions (insights from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE] and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events [CANRACE]).

Ravi R Bajaj1, Shaun G Goodman, Raymond T Yan, Alan J Bagnall, Gabor Gyenes, Robert C Welsh, Kim A Eagle, David Brieger, Krishnan Ramanathan, Francois R Grondin, Andrew T Yan.   

Abstract

The early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains challenging, and a considerable proportion of patients are diagnosed with "possible" ACS on admission. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE(2)) and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) enrolled 16,618 Canadian patients with suspected ACS in 1999 to 2008. We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics, use of cardiac procedures, prognostic accuracy of the GRACE risk score, and in-hospital outcomes between patients given an admission diagnosis of "definite" versus "possible" ACS by the treating physician. Overall, 11,152 and 5,466 patients were given an initial diagnosis of "definite" ACS and "possible" ACS, respectively. Patients with a "possible" ACS had higher GRACE risk score (median 130 vs 125) and less frequently received aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, or β blockers within the first 24 hours of presentation and assessment of left ventricular function, stress testing, cardiac catheterization, and percutaneous coronary intervention (all p <0.05). Patients with "possible" ACS had greater rates of in-hospital myocardial infarction (9.0% vs 2.0%, p <0.05) and heart failure (12% vs 8.9%, p <0.05). The GRACE risk score demonstrated excellent discrimination for in-hospital mortality in both groups and for the entire study population. In conclusion, compared to patients with "definite" ACS on presentation, those with "possible" ACS had higher baseline GRACE risk scores but less frequently received evidence-based medical therapies within 24 hours of admission or underwent cardiac procedures during hospitalization. The GRACE risk score provided accurate risk assessment, regardless of the initial diagnostic impression.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23122889     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Reported underuse of risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST elevations in clinical practice: results of a survey of the ALKK study group.

Authors:  Uwe Zeymer; Steffen Schneider; Ralf Zahn; Dietrich Andresen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Are We Optimizing the Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction?

Authors:  Essa Hariri; Darleen Lessard; Joel Gore; Jeffrey Rade; Robert Goldberg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2019-05-02

3.  The Canadian Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry: Inaugural Report on the Status of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Canada.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Trisha L Parsons; Kristal Heise; Simon L Bacon
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2015-08-18

4.  Quality of care after acute coronary syndromes in a prospective cohort with reasons for non-prescription of recommended medications.

Authors:  Reto Auer; Baris Gencer; Lorenz Räber; Roland Klingenberg; Sebastian Carballo; David Carballo; David Nanchen; Jacques Cornuz; John-Paul Vader; Pierre Vogt; Peter Jüni; Christian M Matter; Stephan Windecker; Thomas Felix Lüscher; François Mach; Nicolas Rodondi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Initiation and persistence with dual antiplatelet therapy after acute myocardial infarction: a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anders Green; Anton Pottegård; Anne Broe; Thomas Goldin Diness; Martha Emneus; Pål Hasvold; Gunnar H Gislason
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Hypertensive emergencies: a new clinical approach.

Authors:  Alfonso Lagi; Simone Cencetti
Journal:  Clin Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-13

7.  Time-To-Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Unit of First Contact in the ERICO Study.

Authors:  Rafael Caire de Oliveira Dos Santos; Alessandra Carvalho Goulart; Alan Loureiro Xavier Kisukuri; Rodrigo Martins Brandão; Debora Sitnik; Henrique Lane Staniak; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Isabela Martins Bensenor; Itamar de Souza Santos
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Are there gender differences in acute management and secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Barbados? A cohort study.

Authors:  Natasha Sobers; Angela M C Rose; T Alafia Samuels; Julia Critchley; Melissa Abed; Ian Hambleton; Arianne Harvey; Nigel Unwin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.