Literature DB >> 23122650

Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Alasdair J Coles1, Cary L Twyman, Douglas L Arnold, Jeffrey A Cohen, Christian Confavreux, Edward J Fox, Hans-Peter Hartung, Eva Havrdova, Krzysztof W Selmaj, Howard L Weiner, Tamara Miller, Elizabeth Fisher, Rupert Sandbrink, Stephen L Lake, David H Margolin, Pedro Oyuela, Michael A Panzara, D Alastair S Compston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab reduces disease activity in previously untreated patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab compared with interferon beta 1a in patients who have relapsed despite first-line treatment.
METHODS: In our 2 year, rater-masked, randomised controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled adults aged 18-55 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and at least one relapse on interferon beta or glatiramer. Eligible participants were randomly allocated in a 1:2:2 ratio by an interactive voice response system, stratified by site, to receive subcutaneous interferon beta 1a 44 μg, intravenous alemtuzumab 12 mg per day, or intravenous alemtuzumab 24 mg per day. Interferon beta 1a was given three-times per week and alemtuzumab was given once per day for 5 days at baseline and for 3 days at 12 months. The 24 mg per day group was discontinued to aid recruitment, but data are included for safety assessments. Coprimary endpoints were relapse rate and time to 6 month sustained accumulation of disability, comparing alemtuzumab 12 mg and interferon beta 1a in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00548405.
FINDINGS: 202 (87%) of 231 patients randomly allocated interferon beta 1a and 426 (98%) of 436 patients randomly allocated alemtuzumab 12 mg were included in the primary analyses. 104 (51%) patients in the interferon beta 1a group relapsed (201 events) compared with 147 (35%) patients in the alemtuzumab group (236 events; rate ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·39-0·65]; p<0·0001), corresponding to a 49·4% improvement with alemtuzumab. 94 (47%) patients in the interferon beta 1a group were relapse-free at 2 years compared with 278 (65%) patients in the alemtuzumab group (p<0·0001). 40 (20%) patients in the interferon beta 1a group had sustained accumulation of disability compared with 54 (13%) in the alemtuzumab group (hazard ratio 0·58 [95% CI 0·38-0·87]; p=0·008), corresponding to a 42% improvement in the alemtuzumab group. For 435 patients allocated alemtuzumab 12 mg, 393 (90%) had infusion-associated reactions, 334 (77%) had infections (compared with 134 [66%] of 202 patients in the interferon beta 1a group) that were mostly mild-moderate with none fatal, 69 (16%) had thyroid disorders, and three (1%) had immune thrombocytopenia.
INTERPRETATION: For patients with first-line treatment-refractory relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, alemtuzumab could be used to reduce relapse rates and sustained accumulation of disability. Suitable risk management strategies allow for early identification of alemtuzumab's main adverse effect of secondary autoimmunity. FUNDING: Genzyme (Sanofi) and Bayer Schering Pharma.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23122650     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61768-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  328 in total

1.  Treatment escalation leads to fewer relapses compared with switching to another moderately effective therapy.

Authors:  Thor Ameri Chalmer; Tomas Kalincik; Bjarne Laursen; Per Soelberg Sorensen; Melinda Magyari
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Advances in and Algorithms for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jens Ingwersen; Orhan Aktas; Hans-Peter Hartung
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  [Current immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  F Paul; K Ruprecht
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Acquired haemophilia A complicating alemtuzumab therapy for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Georgia McCaughan; Jennifer Massey; Ian Sutton; Jennifer Curnow
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-05

Review 6.  Managing Risks with Immune Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Moritz Förster; Patrick Küry; Orhan Aktas; Clemens Warnke; Joachim Havla; Reinhard Hohlfeld; Jan Mares; Hans-Peter Hartung; David Kremer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Effect of Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation vs Continued Disease-Modifying Therapy on Disease Progression in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard K Burt; Roumen Balabanov; Joachim Burman; Basil Sharrack; John A Snowden; Maria Carolina Oliveira; Jan Fagius; John Rose; Flavia Nelson; Amilton Antunes Barreira; Kristina Carlson; Xiaoqiang Han; Daniela Moraes; Amy Morgan; Kathleen Quigley; Kimberly Yaung; Regan Buckley; Carri Alldredge; Allison Clendenan; Michelle A Calvario; Jacquelyn Henry; Borko Jovanovic; Irene B Helenowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  [Multiple sclerosis treatment consensus group (MSTCG): position paper on disease-modifying treatment of multiple sclerosis 2021 (white paper)].

Authors:  Heinz Wiendl; Ralf Gold; Thomas Berger; Tobias Derfuss; Ralf Linker; Mathias Mäurer; Martin Stangel; Orhan Aktas; Karl Baum; Martin Berghoff; Stefan Bittner; Andrew Chan; Adam Czaplinski; Florian Deisenhammer; Franziska Di Pauli; Renaud Du Pasquier; Christian Enzinger; Elisabeth Fertl; Achim Gass; Klaus Gehring; Claudio Gobbi; Norbert Goebels; Michael Guger; Aiden Haghikia; Hans-Peter Hartung; Fedor Heidenreich; Olaf Hoffmann; Zoë R Hunter; Boris Kallmann; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Luisa Klotz; Verena Leussink; Fritz Leutmezer; Volker Limmroth; Jan D Lünemann; Andreas Lutterotti; Sven G Meuth; Uta Meyding-Lamadé; Michael Platten; Peter Rieckmann; Stephan Schmidt; Hayrettin Tumani; Martin S Weber; Frank Weber; Uwe K Zettl; Tjalf Ziemssen; Frauke Zipp
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 9.  Infection risk in patients on multiple sclerosis therapeutics.

Authors:  Eric M Williamson; Joseph R Berger
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  The role of B cells in the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Tohid Gharibi; Zohreh Babaloo; Arezoo Hosseini; Faroogh Marofi; Abbas Ebrahimi-Kalan; Saeed Jahandideh; Behzad Baradaran
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 7.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.