Literature DB >> 23122222

Tekscan pressure sensor output changes in the presence of liquid exposure.

Kyle S Jansson1, Max P Michalski, Sean D Smith, Robert F LaPrade, Coen A Wijdicks.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the load output of a pressure sensor in the presence of liquid saturation in a controlled environment. We hypothesized that a calibrated pressure sensor would provide diminishing load outputs over time in controlled environments of both humidified air and while submerged in saline and the sensors would reach a steady state output once saturated. A consistent compressive load was repeatedly applied to pressure sensors over time (Model 4000, Tekscan, Inc., South Boston, MA) with a tensile testing machine (Instron ElectroPuls E10000, Norwood, MA). All sensors were initially calibrated in a dry environment and were tested in three groups: humid air, submerged in 0.9% saline solution, and dry. Linear regression of load output over time for the pressure sensors exposed to humidity and submerged showed a 4.6% and 4.7% decline in load output each hour for the initial 6h, respectively (β=-0.046, 95% CI: [-0.053 to -0.039]; p<0.001) (β=-0.047, 95% CI: [-0.053 to -0.042; p<0.001). Tests after 72 h of exposure had linear regression decline in load output over time of 0.40% and 0.47% per hour for humidified and submerged sensors, respectively (β=-0.004, 95% CI: [-0.006 to -0.003]; p<0.001) (β=-0.047, 95% CI: [-0.053 to -0.042]; p<0.001). Because outcomes in biomedical research can affect clinical practices and treatments, the diminishing load output of the sensor in the presence of liquids should be accounted for. We recommend soaking sensors for more than 48 h prior to testing in a moist environment.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23122222     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Influence of lateral meniscal posterior root avulsions and the meniscofemoral ligaments on tibiofemoral contact mechanics.

Authors:  Andrew G Geeslin; David Civitarese; Travis Lee Turnbull; Grant J Dornan; Fernando A Fuso; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Different effects of the lateral meniscus complete radial tear on the load distribution and transmission functions depending on the tear site.

Authors:  Tomoki Ohori; Tatsuo Mae; Konsei Shino; Hiromichi Fujie; Takehito Hirose; Yuta Tachibana; Hideki Yoshikawa; Ken Nakata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Altered regional loading patterns on articular cartilage following meniscectomy are not fully restored by autograft meniscal transplantation.

Authors:  H Wang; T Chen; A O Gee; I D Hutchinson; K Stoner; R F Warren; S A Rodeo; S A Maher
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Validation of a method for combining biplanar radiography and magnetic resonance imaging to estimate knee cartilage contact.

Authors:  Eric Thorhauer; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Prediction of patellofemoral joint kinematics and contact through co-simulation of rigid body dynamics and nonlinear finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jacobus H Müller; Swithin Razu; Ahmet Erdemir; Trent M Guess
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Biomechanical analysis of a centralization procedure for extruded lateral meniscus after meniscectomy in porcine knee joints.

Authors:  Yuji Kohno; Hideyuki Koga; Nobutake Ozeki; Junpei Matsuda; Mitsuru Mizuno; Hisako Katano; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.102

7.  Intraarticular arthrofibrosis of the knee alters patellofemoral contact biomechanics.

Authors:  Jacob D Mikula; Erik L Slette; Kimi D Dahl; Scott R Montgomery; Grant J Dornan; Luke O'Brien; Travis Lee Turnbull; Thomas R Hackett
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-12-19

8.  The effect of a dynamic PCL brace on patellofemoral compartment pressures in PCL-and PCL/PLC-deficient knees.

Authors:  Tyler Welch; Thomas Keller; Ruben Maldonado; Melodie Metzger; Karen Mohr; Ronald Kvitne
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-03-31

9.  Use of Tekscan K-scan sensors for retropatellar pressure measurement avoiding errors during implantation and the effects of shear forces on the measurement precision.

Authors:  A Wilharm; Ch Hurschler; T Dermitas; M Bohnsack
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.