Literature DB >> 23122183

Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy.

P W Stather1, R D Sayers, A Cheah, J B Wild, M J Bown, E Choke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate outcomes following EVAR in patients with hostile neck anatomy (HNA).
METHODS: Data prospectively collected from 552 elective EVARs were analysed retrospectively. Data regarding neck morphology was obtained from aneurysm stent plans produced prior to EVAR. HNA was defined as any of; neck diameter >28 mm, neck angulation >60°, neck length <15 mm, neck thrombus, or neck flare.
RESULTS: 552 patients underwent EVAR. Mean age 73.9 years, mean follow-up 4.1 years. 199 patients had HNA, 353 had favourable neck anatomy (FNA). There was a significant increase in late type I endoleaks (FNA 4.5%, HNA 9.5%; P = 0.02) and total reinterventions (FNA 11.0%, HNA 22.8%; P < 0.01), and a significant decrease in late type II endoleaks in patients with HNA (FNA 16.7%, HNA 10.6%; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in technical success (FNA 0.6%, HNA 2.0%; p = 0.12), 30-day re-intervention (FNA 2.8%, HNA 5.0%; P = 0.12), 30-day mortality (FNA 1.1%, HNA 0.5%; P = 0.45), 30-day type I endoleaks (FNA 0.8%, HNA 2.5%; P = 0.12), 5-year mortality (FNA 15.1%, HNA 14.6%; P = 0.86), aneurysm-related mortality (FNA 1.7% versus HNA 2.0%; P = 0.79), stent-graft migration (FNA 2.5%, HNA 3.0%; P = 0.75), sac expansion (FNA 13.0%, HNA 9.5%; P = 0.22), or graft rupture (FNA 1.1%, HNA 3.5%; P = 0.05). Binary logistic regression of individual features of HNA revealed secondary intervention (P = 0.009), technical failure (P = 0.02), and late type I endoleaks (P = 0.002), were significantly increased with increased neck diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: HNA AAAs can be successfully treated with EVAR. However, surveillance is necessary to detect and treat late type I endoleaks in HNA patients.
Copyright © 2012 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23122183     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  12 in total

1.  Aortic Neck Anatomic Features and Predictors of Outcomes in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Following vs Not Following Instructions for Use.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Michael Yacoub; Albeir Y Mousa; Shadi Abu-Halimah; Stephen M Hass; Jenna Kazil; Zachary T AbuRahma; Mohit Srivastava; L Scott Dean; Patrick A Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Long-Term Renal Function after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Athanasios Saratzis; Michael F Bath; Seamus Harrison; Robert D Sayers; Asif Mahmood; Pantelis Sarafidis; Matthew J Bown
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Comparative study of clinical outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysms repair in large diameter aortic necks (>31 mm) versus smaller necks.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Trevor DerDerian; Zachary T AbuRahma; Stephen M Hass; Michael Yacoub; L Scott Dean; Shadi Abu-Halimah; Albeir Y Mousa
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with severely angulated neck and tortuous artery access: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Qinglong Zeng; Lianjun Huang; Xiaoyong Huang; Mingliang Peng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  An Artificial Neural Network Stratifies the Risks of Reintervention and Mortality after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair; a Retrospective Observational study.

Authors:  Alan Karthikesalingam; Omneya Attallah; Xianghong Ma; Sandeep Singh Bahia; Luke Thompson; Alberto Vidal-Diez; Edward C Choke; Matt J Bown; Robert D Sayers; Matt M Thompson; Peter J Holt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Surgeon custom-made iliac branch device to salvage hypogastric artery during endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Young Eun Park; Jae Hoon Lee; Woo-Sung Yun; Ki Hyuk Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  The Influence of Unfavorable Aortoiliac Anatomy on Short-Term Outcomes after Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  Jae Hang Lee; Jin-Ho Choi; Eung-Joong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-05

8.  Changes in Neck Angle, Neck Length, Maximum Diameter, Maximum Area and Thrombus after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Lee; Ki Hyuk Park; Sang Gyu Kwak
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2020-06-30

9.  Outcomes over Time in Patients with Hostile Neck Anatomy Undergoing Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Yolanda Bryce; Wonho Kim; Barry Katzen; James Benenati; Shaun Samuels
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.682

10.  Laparo- and thoracoscopic aortic aneurysm neck optimization and treatment of potential endoleaks type IA and II in a porcine model.

Authors:  Brian O Kloster; Lars Lund; Jes S Lindholt
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.