Literature DB >> 23121136

Do baseline diastolic echocardiographic parameters predict outcome after resynchronization therapy? Results from the PROSPECT trial.

Renee M Sullivan1, Jaime Murillo, Bart Gerritse, Eugene Chung, Michael V Orlov, Berthold Stegemann, Michelle Fedewa, Brett J Peterson, Jing Ping Sun, Brian Olshansky.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve clinical and cardiac structural status in heart failure patients. The role of baseline diastolic echocardiographic parameters to characterize the likelihood of positive outcomes is not well known. We explored relationships between diastolic parameters and outcomes 6 months after CRT implant in the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that diastolic echocardiographic parameters were associated with clinical and structural outcomes in CRT patients.
METHODS: For 426 patients in PROSPECT, a prospective observational trial of CRT, baseline E/A ratio, left atrial (LA) area, isovolumic relaxation time, left ventricular inflow deceleration time, E' velocity, and E/E' ratio were evaluated and related to 6-month clinical composite score (CCS) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction using Spearman rank-order correlations. Parameters associated with outcomes were analyzed further by discrete categorization.
RESULTS: As continuous variables, only E/A ratio and LA area correlated with CCSs (P = 0.017, P = 0.045, respectively) and relative change in LVESV at 6 months (P < 0.0001, P = 0.001, respectively). As discrete variables, E/A ratio and LA area also correlated with CCSs and LVESV.
CONCLUSION: Diastolic echo parameters E/A ratio and LA area were associated with clinical and structural outcomes in CRT patients at 6 months. ©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23121136     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Left atrial size and function as assessed by computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Association to echocardiographic and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Peter Bomholt Hansen; Anders Sommer; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard; Mads Brix Kronborg; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  The relationship between cardiac resynchronization therapy and diastolic function.

Authors:  Gregory F Egnaczyk; Eugene S Chung
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

3.  Narrowing filtered QRS duration on signal-averaged electrocardiogram predicts outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients with nonischemic heart failure.

Authors:  Atsushi Suzuki; Tsuyoshi Shiga; Daigo Yagishita; Yoshimi Yagishita-Tagawa; Kotaro Arai; Yuji Iwanami; Koichiro Ejima; Kyomi Ashihara; Morio Shoda; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Electro-echocardiographic Indices to Predict Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-response on Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ziqing Yu; Xueying Chen; Fei Han; Shengmei Qin; Minghui Li; Yuan Wu; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  The Role of Echocardiography in the Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Spartalis; Eleni Tzatzaki; Eleftherios Spartalis; Christos Damaskos; Antonios Athanasiou; Efthimios Livanis; Vassilis Voudris
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2017-12-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.