Literature DB >> 23121132

Quantitative analysis of pheromone-binding protein specificity.

S Katti1, N Lokhande, D González, A Cassill, R Renthal.   

Abstract

Many pheromones have very low water solubility, posing experimental difficulties for quantitative binding measurements. A new method is presented for determining thermodynamically valid dissociation constants for ligands binding to pheromone-binding proteins, using β-cyclodextrin as a solubilizer and transfer agent. The method is applied to LUSH, a Drosophila odorant-binding protein that binds the pheromone 11-cis vaccenyl acetate (cVA). Refolding of LUSH expressed in Escherichia coli was assessed by measuring N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine (NPN) binding and Förster resonance energy transfer between LUSH tryptophan 123 (W123) and NPN. Binding of cVA was measured from quenching of W123 fluorescence as a function of cVA concentration. The equilibrium constant for transfer of cVA between β-cyclodextrin and LUSH was determined from a linked equilibria model. This constant, multiplied by the β-cyclodextrin-cVA dissociation constant, gives the LUSH-cVA dissociation constant: ∼100 nM. It was also found that other ligands quench W123 fluorescence. The LUSH-ligand dissociation constants were determined to be ∼200 nM for the silk moth pheromone bombykol and ∼90 nM for methyl oleate. The results indicate that the ligand-binding cavity of LUSH can accommodate a variety ligands with strong binding interactions. Implications of this for the Laughlin, Ha, Jones and Smith model of pheromone reception are discussed.
© 2012 Royal Entomological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23121132      PMCID: PMC3552018          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2012.01167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Mol Biol        ISSN: 0962-1075            Impact factor:   3.585


  50 in total

1.  Insect olfactory receptors are heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels.

Authors:  Koji Sato; Maurizio Pellegrino; Takao Nakagawa; Tatsuro Nakagawa; Leslie B Vosshall; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Probing a pheromone binding protein of the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus by endogenous tryptophan fluorescence.

Authors:  Stefanie Bette; Heinz Breer; Jürgen Krieger
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 4.714

3.  Bombykol receptors in the silkworm moth and the fruit fly.

Authors:  Zainulabeuddin Syed; Artyom Kopp; Deborah A Kimbrell; Walter S Leal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pheromone reception in fruit flies expressing a moth's odorant receptor.

Authors:  Zainulabeuddin Syed; Yuko Ishida; Katherine Taylor; Deborah A Kimbrell; Walter S Leal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Kinetics and molecular properties of pheromone binding and release.

Authors:  Walter S Leal; Angela M Chen; Yuko Ishida; Vicky P Chiang; Melissa L Erickson; Tania I Morgan; Jennifer M Tsuruda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Crystal and solution structures of an odorant-binding protein from the southern house mosquito complexed with an oviposition pheromone.

Authors:  Yang Mao; Xianzhong Xu; Wei Xu; Yuko Ishida; Walter S Leal; James B Ames; Jon Clardy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structure of a specific alcohol-binding site defined by the odorant binding protein LUSH from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Schoen W Kruse; Rui Zhao; Dean P Smith; David N M Jones
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-07-27

8.  Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae.

Authors:  R G Vogt; L M Riddiford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981 Sep 10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Queen bee pheromone binding protein pH-induced domain swapping favors pheromone release.

Authors:  Marion E Pesenti; Silvia Spinelli; Valérie Bezirard; Loïc Briand; Jean-Claude Pernollet; Valérie Campanacci; Mariella Tegoni; Christian Cambillau
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  6 in total

1.  Organization and function of Drosophila odorant binding proteins.

Authors:  Nikki K Larter; Jennifer S Sun; John R Carlson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Molecular basis for the behavioral effects of the odorant degrading enzyme Esterase 6 in Drosophila.

Authors:  Faisal Younus; Nicholas J Fraser; Chris W Coppin; Jian-Wei Liu; Galen J Correy; Thomas Chertemps; Gunjan Pandey; Martine Maïbèche; Colin J Jackson; John G Oakeshott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Mutually Exclusive Expression of Closely Related Odorant-Binding Proteins 9A and 9B in the Antenna of the Red Flour Beetle Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Alice Montino; Karthi Balakrishnan; Stefan Dippel; Björn Trebels; Piotr Neumann; Ernst A Wimmer
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-10-12

4.  Ligands for pheromone-sensing neurons are not conformationally activated odorant binding proteins.

Authors:  Carolina Gomez-Diaz; Jaime H Reina; Christian Cambillau; Richard Benton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Antennal Proteome of the Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Caste Differences in Olfactory Receptors and Chemosensory Support Proteins.

Authors:  Jaee Shailesh Shah; Robert Renthal
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 1.857

Review 6.  The 40-Year Mystery of Insect Odorant-Binding Proteins.

Authors:  Karen Rihani; Jean-François Ferveur; Loïc Briand
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.