| Literature DB >> 23119094 |
Xiufang Wang1, Wen Zhou, Jing Lu, Haibin Wang, Chan Xiao, Jing Xia, Guihua Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Flowering synchrony and floral sex ratio have the potential to influence the mating opportunities and reproductive success through female function. Here, we examine the variances in synchronous display of female and male function, ratio of male to female flowers per day and subsequently reproductive output in small populations of two monoecious plants, Sagittaria trifolia and Sagittaria graminea. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDING: We created plant populations of size 2, 4, 10 and 20 and recorded the daily number of blooming male and female flowers per plant to determine daily floral display, flowering synchrony index and ratio of male to female flowers per day. We also harvested the fruits, counted the seeds and calculated the number of fruits and seeds per flower to measure reproductive success through female function. There is less overlap in flowering time of female and male function in smaller populations than in larger populations. Most importantly, we found that male-biased floral sex ratio and imbalanced display period of female and male function for individual plant can lead to a population-size-dependent ratio of male to female flowers per day. Increasing ratio of male to female flowers per day was generally associated with a greater percentage of fruit production.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23119094 PMCID: PMC3485334 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effects of population size and floral sex on the floral display size, the total number of days that flowers bloomed for ramets and for populations in S. trifolia and S. graminea analysed with mixed model ANOVA.
| Floral display size | Total number of flowering days for a ramet | Total number of flowering days for a population | |||||
| Source | d.f. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Floral sex | 1,211 | 61560.07 | 0.00 | 1273.70 | 0.00 | 224.66 | 0.00 |
| Population size | 3,211 | 1.38 | 0.34 | 1.24 | 0.38 | 126.24 | 0.00 |
|
| |||||||
| Floral sex | 1,211 | 93832.32 | 0.00 | 1927.77 | 0.00 | 156.89 | 0.00 |
| Population size | 3,211 | 0.18 | 0.91 | 2.34 | 0.18 | 72.97 | 0.00 |
Figure 1The mean (± SE) of the total number of days that male and female flowers were open for different population sizes of S. trifolia and S. graminea.
Figure 2Daily display size of male (blue triangle) and female flowers (red circle) of S. trifolia and S. graminea using representative examples from population of four different sizes (a) 2, (b) 4, (c) 10 and (d) 20, respectively.
Figure 3The mean (± SE) of flowering synchrony indices within populations of (a) S. trifolia and (b) S. graminea.
Figure 4The mean population floral sex ratio and ratio of male to female flowers per day (± SE) in different population sizes of S. trifolia and S. graminea (n = 108).
Figure 5Dose-response relationships between the proportion of flowers setting fruit and the intra-day ratio of male-to-female flowers in (a) S. trifolia and (b) S. graminea.
The equations were: (a) population of size 10, Y = 0.94(1-e−2.45X), r 2 = 0.96, P<0.001; population of size 20, Y = 0.98(1-e−3.15X), r 2 = 0.98, P<0.001; (b) population of size 2, Y = 0.84(1-e−4.38X), r 2 = 0.98, P<0.001; population of size 4, Y = 0.89(1-e−4.22X), r 2 = 0.97, P<0.001; population of size 10, Y = 0.94(1-e−5.58X), r 2 = 0.96, P<0.001; population of size 20, Y = 0.95(1-e−7.98X), r 2 = 0.99, P<0.001. No significant relationships were detected for populations of size 2 and 4 in S. trifolia.
Figure 6Reproductive success of S. trifolia and S. graminea.
(a) Least-square means (LSM) for total fruit production per plant, (b) LSM for seed production per fruit in populations of different sizes. Bars represent confidence limits to 95%.