OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether computer-assisted, interactive digital analysis of knee radiographs enables identification of different quantitative features of joint damage, and to evaluate the relationship of such features with each other and with clinical characteristics during 5-year followup in early osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Knee radiographs from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) study, including 1002 individuals with early OA complaints, were evaluated for different measures with knee images digital analysis (KIDA). To aid definition of different radiographic features of OA, principal component analysis of KIDA was used. Features were correlated (Pearson) to each other, evaluated for changes over time, and related to clinical outcome (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for pain and function) using baseline, 2-year, and 5-year followup data. RESULTS: The identified radiographic features were joint space width (JSW: minimum, medial, lateral), varus angle, osteophyte area, eminence height, and bone density. The features progressed in severity at different times during followup: early (medial JSW, osteophyte area), late (minimum and lateral JSW, eminence height), and both early and late (varus angle, bone density). Correlations between different radiographic features varied between timepoints. The JSW features were most strongly related to each other (largest r = 0.82), but also, e.g., osteophytes and bone density were correlated (largest r = 0.33). The relationships with clinical outcome varied over time, but were most commonly found for osteophyte area and JSW. CONCLUSION: In this early OA cohort, different radiographic features were identified that progressed at different rates between timepoints. The relations between radiographic features and with clinical outcome varied over time. This implies that longitudinal evaluation of different features can improve insight into progression of OA.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether computer-assisted, interactive digital analysis of knee radiographs enables identification of different quantitative features of joint damage, and to evaluate the relationship of such features with each other and with clinical characteristics during 5-year followup in early osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Knee radiographs from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) study, including 1002 individuals with early OA complaints, were evaluated for different measures with knee images digital analysis (KIDA). To aid definition of different radiographic features of OA, principal component analysis of KIDA was used. Features were correlated (Pearson) to each other, evaluated for changes over time, and related to clinical outcome (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for pain and function) using baseline, 2-year, and 5-year followup data. RESULTS: The identified radiographic features were joint space width (JSW: minimum, medial, lateral), varus angle, osteophyte area, eminence height, and bone density. The features progressed in severity at different times during followup: early (medial JSW, osteophyte area), late (minimum and lateral JSW, eminence height), and both early and late (varus angle, bone density). Correlations between different radiographic features varied between timepoints. The JSW features were most strongly related to each other (largest r = 0.82), but also, e.g., osteophytes and bone density were correlated (largest r = 0.33). The relationships with clinical outcome varied over time, but were most commonly found for osteophyte area and JSW. CONCLUSION: In this early OA cohort, different radiographic features were identified that progressed at different rates between timepoints. The relations between radiographic features and with clinical outcome varied over time. This implies that longitudinal evaluation of different features can improve insight into progression of OA.
Authors: M R Huizinga; J Gorter; A Demmer; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; R W Brouwer Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Mayank Dineshkumar Kothari; Kaitlin G Rabe; Donald D Anderson; Michael C Nevitt; John A Lynch; Neil A Segal; Hayden Franz Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Hans Liebl; Gabby Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Nathan Singh; Ursula Heilmeier; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Pia M Jungmann; Charles E McCulloch; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Olivier Bruyère; Cyrus Cooper; Nigel Arden; Jaime Branco; Maria Luisa Brandi; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; Francis Berenbaum; Elaine Dennison; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Marc Hochberg; John Kanis; Andrea Laslop; Tim McAlindon; Susanne Reiter; Pascal Richette; René Rizzoli; Jean-Yves Reginster Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Jorge I Galván-Tejada; José M Celaya-Padilla; Victor Treviño; José G Tamez-Peña Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2015-10-04 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Aleksei Tiulpin; Stefan Klein; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Jérôme Thevenot; Esa Rahtu; Joyce van Meurs; Edwin H G Oei; Simo Saarakkala Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 4.379