Literature DB >> 23117953

Strategies to address weight-based victimization: youths' preferred support interventions from classmates, teachers, and parents.

Rebecca M Puhl1, Jamie Lee Peterson, Joerg Luedicke.   

Abstract

Weight-Based Victimization is a frequent experience for adolescents who are overweight or obese, and is associated with numerous psychosocial and physical consequences for those who are targets of victimization. Assessing targets` preferences for different types of support and intervention has been absent in the context of weight-based victimization, but is needed to help inform potential interventions, motivate action, and identify strategies to help adolescents cope with experiences of weight-related teasing or bullying. Adolescents (14-18 years, N = 361, 40 % female, 71 % Caucasian) enrolled in national weight-loss camps completed an on-line survey. Participants who reported previous experiences of weight-based victimization were surveyed about their preferred interventions from peers, friends, teachers, Physical Education (PE) teachers/coaches, and parents. Participants indicated their preferences for specific strategies pertaining to target support, bullying intervention and prevention (e.g., inclusion in peer activities, confronting the bully, telling an adult, and improving anti-bullying policies). Friends (66 %) and peers (58 %) were the most highly preferred intervention agents followed by teachers (55 %), PE teachers/coaches (44 %), and parents (43 %). Participants who experienced more weight-based victimization expressed increased desire for intervention. The frequency of victimization, social support from friends and family, and perceived likelihood and helpfulness of intervention significantly influenced participant preferences for certain types of intervention, although preferences were generally consistent across participants' characteristics. The current study is the first to document youth's preferences for interventions in response to weight-based victimization. The findings have important implications for encouraging appropriate intervention and informing bystanders, which may help to reduce the prevalence, recurrence, and consequences for youth who are targets of weight-based teasing or bullying.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23117953     DOI: 10.1007/s10964-012-9849-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Youth Adolesc        ISSN: 0047-2891


  32 in total

1.  Prevalence, characteristics, and correlates of teasing experiences among overweight children vs. non-overweight peers.

Authors:  Helen A Hayden-Wade; Richard I Stein; Ata Ghaderi; Brian E Saelens; Marion F Zabinski; Denise E Wilfley
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-08

2.  Weight-teasing and emotional well-being in adolescents: longitudinal findings from Project EAT.

Authors:  Marla E Eisenberg; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Jess Haines; Melanie Wall
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Cause and effect beliefs and self-esteem of overweight children.

Authors:  J W Pierce; J Wardle
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.982

4.  Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention.

Authors:  Michele L Ybarra; Marie Diener-West; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment.

Authors:  T R Nansel; M Overpeck; R S Pilla; W J Ruan; B Simons-Morton; P Scheidt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Weight-based victimization: bullying experiences of weight loss treatment-seeking youth.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Jamie Lee Peterson; Joerg Luedicke
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Peer victimization, psychosocial adjustment, and physical activity in overweight and at-risk-for-overweight youth.

Authors:  Eric A Storch; Vanessa A Milsom; Ninoska Debraganza; Adam B Lewin; Gary R Geffken; Janet H Silverstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2006-04-06

8.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Personal, behavioral, and environmental risk and protective factors for adolescent overweight.

Authors:  Jess Haines; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Melanie Wall; Mary Story
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies.

Authors:  M E Procidano; K Heller
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  1983-02
View more
  6 in total

1.  Trends in relative weight over 1 year in low-income urban youth.

Authors:  Hannah G Lawman; Giridhar Mallya; Stephanie Vander Veur; Tara McCoy; Lisa Colby; Tim Sanders; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Gary D Foster
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  The Identity Threat of Weight Stigma in Adolescents.

Authors:  Wren B Hand; Jennifer C Robinson; Mary W Stewart; Lei Zhang; Samuel C Hand
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Parental concerns about weight-based victimization in youth.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Joerg Luedicke; Jenny A Depierre
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Integrating intervention targets offered by homeostatic theory.

Authors:  Rachel A Annunziato; Stephanie L Grossman
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2016-03-27

5.  Bullying and Victimization in Overweight and Obese Outpatient Children and Adolescents: An Italian Multicentric Study.

Authors:  Dario Bacchini; Maria Rosaria Licenziati; Alessandra Garrasi; Nicola Corciulo; Daniela Driul; Rita Tanas; Perla Maria Fiumani; Elena Di Pietro; Sabino Pesce; Antonino Crinò; Giulio Maltoni; Lorenzo Iughetti; Alessandro Sartorio; Manuela Deiana; Francesca Lombardi; Giuliana Valerio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using facilitator-receiver peer dyads matched according to socioeconomic status to promote behaviour change in overweight adolescents: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Laura Saez; Karine Legrand; Camille Alleyrat; Serge Ramisasoa; Johanne Langlois; Laurent Muller; Abdou Yacoubou Omorou; Rozenn De Lavenne; Joëlle Kivits; Edith Lecomte; Serge Briançon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.