Literature DB >> 23117850

Natural history of adults with congenitally malformed aortic valves (unicuspid or bicuspid).

William Clifford Roberts1, Travis James Vowels, Jong Mi Ko.   

Abstract

Appreciation of the frequency of the congenitally malformed aortic valve has come about during the last 50 years, a period during which aortic valve replacement became a predictably successful operation. Study of patients at necropsy with either a congenitally unicuspid (1 true commissure) or bicuspid (2 true commissures) valve in whom no aortic valve operation has been performed has not been conducted during these 50 years, to our knowledge. We studied 218 patients at necropsy with congenitally malformed aortic valves: 28 (13%) had a unicuspid valve and 190 (87%), a bicuspid valve. Their ages at death ranged from 21 to 89 years (mean, 55 yr), and 80% were men. Of the 218 adults, the aortic valve functioned normally during life in 54 (25%) and abnormally in 164 (75%): aortic stenosis in 142 (65%), pure aortic regurgitation without superimposed infective endocarditis (IE) in 2 (1%), and IE superimposed on a previously normally functioning aortic valve in 20 (9%). IE occurred in a total of 31 (14%) of the 218 patients: involving a previously normally functioning valve in 20 (65%) and a previously stenotic valve in 11 (35%). Of the 218 patients, at least 141 (65%) died as a consequence of aortic valve disease (124 patients) or ascending aortic tears with or without dissection (17 patients). An estimated 1% of the population, maybe higher in men, has a congenitally malformed aortic valve. Data from this study suggest that about 75% of them will develop a major complication. Conversely, and encouragingly, about 25% will go through life without a complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23117850     DOI: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3182764b84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


  11 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with native aortic valve regurgitation.

Authors:  Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Siri Kadire; Mark R Heckle; Jiajing Wang; Uzoma N Ibebuogu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

2.  Unicuspid aortic valve presenting with cardiac arrest in an adolescent.

Authors:  Tara Connelly; Walenty Kolcow; Yvonne Smyth; David Veerasingham
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valves: Different phenotypes of the same disease? Insight from the GenTAC Registry.

Authors:  Joseph M Krepp; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Adrienne Bruce; Siddharth K Prakash; Shaine A Morris; Dianna M Milewicz; Kathryn W Holmes; William Ravekes; Ralph V Shohet; Reed E Pyeritz; Cheryl L Maslen; Barbara L Kroner; Kim A Eagle; Liliana Preiss; Federico M Asch
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Infective endocarditis superimposed on a massively calcified severely stenotic congenitally bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Syed Sarmast; Jeffrey M Schussler; Jong M Ko; William C Roberts
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2014-01

5.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in a Patient with Unicuspid Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Angelo Nascimbene; Pranav Loyalka; Igor D Gregoric; Ricardo Bellera; Maan Malahfji; Marija Petrovic; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-04-01

6.  Cardiovascular Outcomes in Aortopathy: GenTAC Registry of Genetically Triggered Aortic Aneurysms and Related Conditions.

Authors:  Kathryn W Holmes; Sheila Markwardt; Kim A Eagle; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Federico M Asch; Scott A LeMaire; Cheryl L Maslen; Howard K Song; Dianna M Milewicz; Siddharth K Prakash; Dongchuan Guo; Shaine A Morris; Reed E Pyeritz; Rita C Milewski; William J Ravekes; H C Dietz; Ralph V Shohet; Michael Silberbach; Mary J Roman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 27.203

7.  Clinical outcome, valve dysfunction, and progressive aortic dilation in a pediatric population with isolated bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Gaia Spaziani; Piercarlo Ballo; Silvia Favilli; Veronica Fibbi; Lorenzo Buonincontri; Iva Pollini; Alfredo Zuppiroli; Enrico Chiappa
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Cardiac, mandibular and thymic phenotypical association indicates that cranial neural crest underlies bicuspid aortic valve formation in hamsters.

Authors:  Jessica Martínez-Vargas; Jacint Ventura; Ángela Machuca; Francesc Muñoz-Muñoz; María Carmen Fernández; María Teresa Soto-Navarrete; Ana Carmen Durán; Borja Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Characteristics of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Stenosis: The National Echo Database of Australia.

Authors:  Michelle S Lim; Geoff Strange; David Playford; Simon Stewart; David S Celermajer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Discovery of an Experimental Model of Unicuspid Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Robert M Weiss; Yi Chu; Robert M Brooks; Donald D Lund; Justine Cheng; Kathy A Zimmerman; Melissa K Kafa; Phanicharan Sistla; Hardik Doshi; Jian Q Shao; Ramzi N El Accaoui; Catherine M Otto; Donald D Heistad
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.